Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why Do You Need a Speech Processor for Your CB Radio?
Two-way radio communication relies on the modulation contained within the signal. Maintaining a high modulation level is crucial in providing the highest possible efficiency from any transmitter operating on AM, FM, or SSB modes. Two-way radios also rely on microphones that inherently change audio levels delivered to the transmitter. This causes transmitter modulation to fluctuate greatly depending on voice level and pitch. The average modulation of a typical voice signal is only about 40%. This low percentage applied to the transmitter, results in less than optimal transmission range. Other Processors Have a Problem... Other speech processors use a low-cost "audio clipping" approach to achieve compression. While this method is economical for the manufacturer, clipping distorts the original signal and sounds fuzzy on the air. What these types of audio processors gain in volume, they lose in voice intelligibility. VoiceMax is Different... VoiceMax uses a sophisticated AGC (Automatic Gain Control) circuit that installs inside your transceiver to hold the audio level constant, with less than 1% harmonic distortion. No "clipping" type processor can come close to this low distortion level. Whether you're whispering or shouting, VoiceMax holds your transceiver at 100% modulation allowing you to punch through heavy channel traffic without sacrificing voice clarity. VoiceMax incorporates a feature not offered on other processors. The adjustable noise gate allows the user to block unwanted ambient background sounds. This feature is especially helpful in mobile environments where wind and road noise can be an issue. VoiceMax works with your non-amplified dynamic microphone to give you tremendous audio punch without all the background noise associated with power microphones. www.telstar-electronics.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telstar Electronics wrote:
Why Do You Need a Speech Processor for Your CB Radio? Two-way radio communication relies on the modulation contained within the signal. Maintaining a high modulation level is crucial in providing the highest possible efficiency from any transmitter operating on AM, FM, or SSB modes. Two-way radios also rely on microphones that inherently change audio levels delivered to the transmitter. This causes transmitter modulation to fluctuate greatly depending on voice level and pitch. The average modulation of a typical voice signal is only about 40%. This low percentage applied to the transmitter, results in less than optimal transmission range. PURE B--- S--- The peak power is the peak power is the peak power! Distorting the audio with a speech processor ... distorts the audio. Distorted audio is distorted audio is distorted audio. Modulation is supposed to fluctuate greatly. It is supposed to replicate your voice which fluctuates greatly. If it does not replicate your voice it is by definition DISTORTION!! Most processors cause 'nasal' and high pitched sounding audio because our voices are not 'nasal or high pitched. It is called DISTORTION. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 13, 3:19 pm, Deek wrote:
Telstar Electronics wrote: Why Do You Need a Speech Processor for Your CB Radio? Two-way radio communication relies on the modulation contained within the signal. Maintaining a high modulation level is crucial in providing the highest possible efficiency from any transmitter operating on AM, FM, or SSB modes. Two-way radios also rely on microphones that inherently change audio levels delivered to the transmitter. This causes transmitter modulation to fluctuate greatly depending on voice level and pitch. The average modulation of a typical voice signal is only about 40%. This low percentage applied to the transmitter, results in less than optimal transmission range. PURE B--- S--- The peak power is the peak power is the peak power! Distorting the audio with a speech processor ... distorts the audio. Distorted audio is distorted audio is distorted audio. Modulation is supposed to fluctuate greatly. It is supposed to replicate your voice which fluctuates greatly. If it does not replicate your voice it is by definition DISTORTION!! Most processors cause 'nasal' and high pitched sounding audio because our voices are not 'nasal or high pitched. It is called DISTORTION. You might want to read this... it's a good explanation of what VoiceMax is all about. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VOGAD |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telstar Electronics wrote:
On Sep 13, 3:19 pm, Deek wrote: Telstar Electronics wrote: Why Do You Need a Speech Processor for Your CB Radio? Two-way radio communication relies on the modulation contained within the signal. Maintaining a high modulation level is crucial in providing the highest possible efficiency from any transmitter operating on AM, FM, or SSB modes. Two-way radios also rely on microphones that inherently change audio levels delivered to the transmitter. This causes transmitter modulation to fluctuate greatly depending on voice level and pitch. The average modulation of a typical voice signal is only about 40%. This low percentage applied to the transmitter, results in less than optimal transmission range. PURE B--- S--- The peak power is the peak power is the peak power! Distorting the audio with a speech processor ... distorts the audio. Distorted audio is distorted audio is distorted audio. Modulation is supposed to fluctuate greatly. It is supposed to replicate your voice which fluctuates greatly. If it does not replicate your voice it is by definition DISTORTION!! Most processors cause 'nasal' and high pitched sounding audio because our voices are not 'nasal or high pitched. It is called DISTORTION. You might want to read this... it's a good explanation of what VoiceMax is all about. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VOGAD I understand DISTORTION quite well! I hold an EE degree, managed an EE design department for 10 years, and served as Chief Engineer on a major Military System LGM 118A RS/RV. Speech compression IS IS IS distortion. PERIOD! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 14, 6:42 am, Deek wrote:
I understand DISTORTION quite well! I hold an EE degree, managed an EE design department for 10 years, and served as Chief Engineer on a major Military System LGM 118A RS/RV. Speech compression IS IS IS distortion. PERIOD! I can see why your services were no longer required as Chief Engineer... thanks for your comments. www.telstar-electronics.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telstar Electronics wrote:
On Sep 14, 6:42 am, Deek wrote: I understand DISTORTION quite well! I hold an EE degree, managed an EE design department for 10 years, and served as Chief Engineer on a major Military System LGM 118A RS/RV. Speech compression IS IS IS distortion. PERIOD! I can see why your services were no longer required as Chief Engineer... thanks for your comments. www.telstar-electronics.com I can see why you're more interested in $$ than in accuracy. If I put a CONSTANT amplitude swept frequency signal, swept from 300 to 3000 Hz, audio bandwidth, to the input to a transmitting device and I get a VARIABLE amplitude signal, swept from 300 to 3000 Hz, as the audio output, the device has DISTORTED the audio. That's just what speech compressors accomplish. Every single speech processor is a controlled distortion device. You can market and do salesmanship all you want. You are still selling a device that distorts the audio. Distortion is distortion!! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Deek" wrote in message . .. Telstar Electronics wrote: On Sep 14, 6:42 am, Deek wrote: I understand DISTORTION quite well! I hold an EE degree, managed an EE design department for 10 years, and served as Chief Engineer on a major Military System LGM 118A RS/RV. Speech compression IS IS IS distortion. PERIOD! I can see why your services were no longer required as Chief Engineer... thanks for your comments. www.telstar-electronics.com I can see why you're more interested in $$ than in accuracy. If I put a CONSTANT amplitude swept frequency signal, swept from 300 to 3000 Hz, audio bandwidth, to the input to a transmitting device and I get a VARIABLE amplitude signal, swept from 300 to 3000 Hz, as the audio output, the device has DISTORTED the audio. That's just what speech compressors accomplish. Every single speech processor is a controlled distortion device. You can market and do salesmanship all you want. You are still selling a device that distorts the audio. Distortion is distortion!! It not only Distorts the audio signal but causes either over deviation on FM or Splatter on both AM and SSB, and that's the garbage you hear on adjacent channels. If you look real close on some built-in CB power meters, instead of the signal increasing, it actually decreases! Distortion = Flat topping of the signal... |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:16:32 -0400, Deek wrote:
Telstar Electronics wrote: On Sep 14, 6:42 am, Deek wrote: I understand DISTORTION quite well! I hold an EE degree, managed an EE design department for 10 years, and served as Chief Engineer on a major Military System LGM 118A RS/RV. Speech compression IS IS IS distortion. PERIOD! I can see why your services were no longer required as Chief Engineer... thanks for your comments. www.telstar-electronics.com I can see why you're more interested in $$ than in accuracy. If I put a CONSTANT amplitude swept frequency signal, swept from 300 to 3000 Hz, audio bandwidth, to the input to a transmitting device and I get a VARIABLE amplitude signal, swept from 300 to 3000 Hz, as the audio output, the device has DISTORTED the audio. That's just what speech compressors accomplish. Every single speech processor is a controlled distortion device. You can market and do salesmanship all you want. You are still selling a device that distorts the audio. Distortion is distortion!! Far be it for me to in any way shape or form, defend the spamming hype, marketing what is nothing more than a common IC made for the purpose, but I'm going to disagree with you to some extent. By your definition, any bandpass filtering, such as you set up in your example, would cause "distortion." The transfer function with respect to frequency is nonlinear, i.e. it's distorted. Unless you're one of the guys gargling on 14.18 MHZ, I hope you would not argue that frequency response shaping is not something that we want to do in (voice) communications systems. So assuming we agree on that, then like the guy negotiating with the gal he's trying to bed, we now are just negotiating the price, or acceptable amount of distortion. Since the purpose of a communication system (unless you're just peddling hardware) is to communicate, then one has to look at the trade-off between distortion and intelligibility. If purposefully "distorting" the signal by frequency shaping, compression, clipping or any combination thereof improves the intelligibility at the other end of the circuit then "distortion" is a good thing, semantics aside. Wes N7WS |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
IDIOT!
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message I can see why my services were no longer required |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Deek" wrote in message . .. Telstar Electronics wrote: On Sep 13, 3:19 pm, Deek wrote: Telstar Electronics wrote: Why Do You Need a Speech Processor for Your CB Radio? Two-way radio communication relies on the modulation contained within the signal. Maintaining a high modulation level is crucial in providing the highest possible efficiency from any transmitter operating on AM, FM, or SSB modes. Two-way radios also rely on microphones that inherently change audio levels delivered to the transmitter. This causes transmitter modulation to fluctuate greatly depending on voice level and pitch. The average modulation of a typical voice signal is only about 40%. This low percentage applied to the transmitter, results in less than optimal transmission range. PURE B--- S--- The peak power is the peak power is the peak power! Distorting the audio with a speech processor ... distorts the audio. Distorted audio is distorted audio is distorted audio. Modulation is supposed to fluctuate greatly. It is supposed to replicate your voice which fluctuates greatly. If it does not replicate your voice it is by definition DISTORTION!! Most processors cause 'nasal' and high pitched sounding audio because our voices are not 'nasal or high pitched. It is called DISTORTION. You might want to read this... it's a good explanation of what VoiceMax is all about. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VOGAD I understand DISTORTION quite well! I hold an EE degree, managed an EE design department for 10 years, and served as Chief Engineer on a major Military System LGM 118A RS/RV. Speech compression IS IS IS distortion. PERIOD! You are correct, of course. But there are instances where distortion increases intelligibility. as I'm sure an EE knows in spades. Ed, NM2K |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CB Shops to distribute VoiceMax... | CB | |||
CB Shops to distribute VoiceMax... | CB | |||
VoiceMax Speech Processor | CB | |||
VoiceMax... | CB | |||
VoiceMax is Coming... | CB |