Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
icom ic-w32a vs. others
This is my first radio purchase so I have a few questions. I have a
friend that swears by the ICOM IC-w32a. I've looked at it and it does seem like a pretty robust radio. Heck, it must be if ICOM put it back into production after stopping once before. But, I'm interested in knowing if there are others out there with the same capabilities. I'm really interested in the fact that it can xmit on 440MHz and received on 70 cm, at least I think it can, since I want to use this for talking over satellites. Any ideas about other radios I should look at would be most appreciated. Thanks. -brad w. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
icom ic-w32a vs. others
On Mar 27, 9:56 pm, Ron in Radio Heaven
wrote: wrote: But, I'm interested in knowing if there are others out there with the same capabilities. I'm really interested in the fact that it can xmit on 440MHz and received on 70 cm, at least I think it can, Isn't 440MHz and 70cm the same band? What's the big deal in that? Ron W4RON oops... you're right.. I meant to say 2m/440 MHz.. -brad w. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
icom ic-w32a vs. others
They are very popular with satellite operators, due to the full duplex
capability. Currently if you want full duplex, not just split band operation, your only real choice is the Kenwood TH-7, which has a lot of APRS functions as well. -- Alan WA4SCA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
icom ic-w32a vs. others
On Mar 28, 7:37 am, Alan WA4SCA wrote:
They are very popular with satellite operators, due to the full duplex capability. Currently if you want full duplex, not just split band operation, your only real choice is the Kenwood TH-7, which has a lot of APRS functions as well. So I looked at the Kenwood Th-D7A like you mentioned. I noticed the manual says it's not capable of doing less than 438 Mhz. Is this a hard rule with this device? Because a lot of the satellites that I want to work are a little bit less than this. Like AO-51 which has a downlink of 435.300 MHz. As I've said, this is my first radio purchase so I just want to make sure it will do what I want. Any help is most appreciated. -brad w. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
icom ic-w32a vs. others
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 07:57:37 -0700, Dick wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:05:20 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 28, 7:37 am, Alan WA4SCA wrote: They are very popular with satellite operators, due to the full duplex capability. Currently if you want full duplex, not just split band operation, your only real choice is the Kenwood TH-7, which has a lot of APRS functions as well. So I looked at the Kenwood Th-D7A like you mentioned. I noticed the manual says it's not capable of doing less than 438 Mhz. Is this a hard rule with this device? Because a lot of the satellites that I want to work are a little bit less than this. Like AO-51 which has a downlink of 435.300 MHz. As I've said, this is my first radio purchase so I just want to make sure it will do what I want. Any help is most appreciated. -brad w. According the the QST reviews of both the TH-D7A (Aug 1999) and the TH-D7A(G) (Apr 2008) the transmitter frequency coverage as measured in their lab is 430-450 MHz. Kenwood shows 438-450 MHz for both of them. Dick - W6CCD Just to verify the above, I set my TH-D7A(G) at 430 MHz and checked the output against my HP frequency counter. No problem transmitting at that frequency. I also verified that 430 is the bottom of the range. Dick - W6CCD -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Icom IC-W32A | Swap | |||
FS: ICOM W32A | Swap | |||
FS: Icom W32A plus everything!! | Swap | |||
FS: Icom IC-W32A | Swap | |||
Icom IC-W32A | Swap |