Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "A" wrote in message x.com... On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Michael Coslo wrote: Jiggly wrote: The hobby has lots of people who are morbidly obese. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morbid_obesity for definition) Sadly, many of them die from weight-related causes. We lose a lot of nice people and good operators that way. That reminds me..... For years we've been force fed about how we have to eat right, not smoke, etc. How the obese ans smokers and heavy drinkers were going to be a healthcare disaster. Apparently that stuff takes an average of 4 years off our life. People who live the proper life will live around 4 years longer on average. But the kicker is this: When they got the stats on relative life expectancy, they found the causes of death. Those obese and smoking and hard drinkin' jerks tended to have a quick end, while the righteous proper folk tended to have long debilitating ends. My Mother-in-law didn't smoke, didn't drink, and spent the lat 8 years of her life as an dementia patient in a nursing home. I cringe every time I think of that happening to me. The problem with lengthening our lives is that any gains we make are at the wrong end. - 73 de Mike N3LI - Some thoughts on the wisdom above: all those articles citing studies involving statistics benefit not you, but i) the newspaper reporter making his wages for doing this, ii) the medical school professor getting the grants to do the work (including pay his/her salary [i.e. the school gets its staff for free]), and iii) the bean-counter actuaries who work with the insurance companies figuring out what premiums to charge you based on any factors that significantly affect the mortality curves. No doctor can plug into you any "voltmeter" (or cholesterol meter, or weight meter, etc), and tell you because of X, YOU're going to live N more days. You can calculate satellite orbits, miles of gas left in your car's gas tank, and minutes of light left in a flashlight with considerable accuracy, but in a biological animal, you can't make those kinds of predictions unless you're talking about death being caused by bleeding at high rates or you're in the middle of suffering a hearth attack or the likes of that. Now, enjoy the rest of your life as best you can (ice cream, booze, don't smoke tobacco around me, etc) and consider that if you agonize too much over things, then those visits to the psychiatrists will cut into your entertainment budget AND you will be more unhappy. 73 -------------- I've seen a lot of fit, slim, healthy and trim folks pass on in my 62 year life. And not from car accidents, falling, electrocution, car crashes or plane crashes. It seems that the active folks are actually worriers, more so than we portly folks. One thing I do know for sure is that after smoking for 35 years, quitting was a mistake. The damage was already done to my body. The weight that I gained after quitting has brought on myriad problems that I did not have before, such as diabetes, high blood pressure, diabetic neuropathy, etc. Had I just kept on smoking, chances are I would have been much better off. If you don't smoke, don't start. If you do smoke at a good clip, think twice before quitting. Had I to do quitting again with what I know now, no way would I have done so. This is my seventh year having quit smoking. Now I have this cotton picking seven year record to maintain and improve upon. And over one hundred pounds of blubber to tote that I didn't have before I quit smoking. I don't care what the doctors say. Being slim and smoking is lots better than being a non smoker, but fat. Now we need to arrange some lynching parties for the *******s that began taxing cigarettes at a ridiculous rate. Ed Cregger |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
This is getting really ugly | CB | |||
Ugly Radio | Broadcasting | |||
Am I the only one that thinks backlite LCD screen ham radios are butt ugly? | Equipment | |||
Ugly | Swap |