On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:01:55 -0700 (PDT), Brian wrote:
On Jul 22, 2:09 am, John Smith wrote:
http://www.............

Your point is ..........?

His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.

Spamm Trappe wrote:

...
His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.

LOL!

Where, exactly, would you expect posts about digital equipment--other
than a digital/equipment thread?

Maybe rec.radio.amateur.smokesignals?

Geesh, takes all types! :-(

Regards,
JS

John Smith wrote:
Spamm Trappe wrote:

...
His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.

LOL!

Where, exactly, would you expect posts about digital equipment--other
than a digital/equipment thread?

Maybe rec.radio.amateur.smokesignals?

Geesh, takes all types! :-(

Regards,
JS

If you failed to notice, the transceiver comes with open source
software; Meaning, you can modify the software to operate with any
digital data transfer protocol (modes, to the illiterate) which anyone
can imagine.

Regards,
JS

Spamm Trappe wrote:

...
His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.

Yanno, the illogic of that statement overwhelms me. It makes me wonder
where people capable/prone-to making such statements come from?

I mean that statement presupposes that an interest in state-of-the-art
equipment is some sort of illicit/insane leaning which needs to be
ignored/attacked.

What, you are still awaiting the return of the spark-gap transmitters?
This all, only, sounds to me as if you wish burden others with your
preferences/likes/interests/beliefs/etc ... What? Everyone is an
amateur politician these days?

Regards,
JS

On 22 Jul 2008 15:12:25 GMT, Spamm Trappe
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:01:55 -0700 (PDT), Brian wrote:
On Jul 22, 2:09 am, John Smith wrote:
http://www.............

Your point is ..........?

His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.
I usally refrain from commenting on stuff like this but I gotta ask
today:
The groups posted to are
rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digi tal.misc

The url is pointing to a very high end transciever.

Just what is it that does not fit?
John Ferrell W8CCW