Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan,
It has to do with efficiency, cost, complexity, etc. It was not a casual decision. If one uses a delta configuration, instead of a Y, then you only need three leads, not four. Evan |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "K9SQG" wrote in message ... Alan, It has to do with efficiency, cost, complexity, etc. It was not a casual decision. If one uses a delta configuration, instead of a Y, then you only need three leads, not four. Unless you are tapping for 120 on a 240 Delta or 240 on a 480 Delta, in which case a center tap of any of the phases becomes Neutral for a split phase Edison circuit. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31 Dec 2003 00:48:51 GMT, K9SQG wrote:
It has to do with efficiency, cost, complexity, etc. It was not a casual decision. If one uses a delta configuration, instead of a Y, then you only need three leads, not four. IIRC (it's been 50 years since I studied this) a Y-Y circuit has problems with in-phase circulating third harmonic currents flowing on the neutral. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane P.E. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan,
It has to do with efficiency, cost, complexity, etc. It was not a casual decision. If one uses a delta configuration, instead of a Y, then you only need three leads, not four. Evan |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "K9SQG" wrote in message ... Alan, It has to do with efficiency, cost, complexity, etc. It was not a casual decision. If one uses a delta configuration, instead of a Y, then you only need three leads, not four. Unless you are tapping for 120 on a 240 Delta or 240 on a 480 Delta, in which case a center tap of any of the phases becomes Neutral for a split phase Edison circuit. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31 Dec 2003 00:48:51 GMT, K9SQG wrote:
It has to do with efficiency, cost, complexity, etc. It was not a casual decision. If one uses a delta configuration, instead of a Y, then you only need three leads, not four. IIRC (it's been 50 years since I studied this) a Y-Y circuit has problems with in-phase circulating third harmonic currents flowing on the neutral. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane P.E. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill wrote in message ...
wrote: In sci.electronics.basics Rob Paisley wrote: | For larger horsepower motors, Three Phases means that they will | start with no external mechanical assistance. And, as I understand it, they can then "stand on one leg" although they will be a bit "shaky". You can also reverse the rotation by swapping two of the phases. If one phase is blown you can start it by giving it a spin in the right direction, 'without' getting your hand caught Bill Baka I am not sure if a 3 phase motor would even rotate unloaded on 2 phases but it certainly would not develop a usable amount of horsepower. I would suspect that running on 1 phase would be out of the question. I do know that if a loaded 3 phase motor blows a fuse it will almost always blow a fuse in one of the other lines due to an overload. Due to the way the control power for the motor is connected the starter will then open the circuit if it did not already do so when the first fuse failed. Also, there is a number of 1.57 being bandied about in this thread for the relative horse power of a 3 phase versus single motor for a given current. This number should be 1.73 (The square root of 3. Rob. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
How would you hook up a 3-phase motor to run on 2 phases?
How would you hook up a 3 phase motor to run on one phase? I don't care whether they work or not, I just want to see the wiring diagram. Thanks in advance. "Rob Paisley" wrote in message om... Bill wrote in message ... wrote: In sci.electronics.basics Rob Paisley wrote: | For larger horsepower motors, Three Phases means that they will | start with no external mechanical assistance. And, as I understand it, they can then "stand on one leg" although they will be a bit "shaky". You can also reverse the rotation by swapping two of the phases. If one phase is blown you can start it by giving it a spin in the right direction, 'without' getting your hand caught Bill Baka I am not sure if a 3 phase motor would even rotate unloaded on 2 phases but it certainly would not develop a usable amount of horsepower. I would suspect that running on 1 phase would be out of the question. I do know that if a loaded 3 phase motor blows a fuse it will almost always blow a fuse in one of the other lines due to an overload. Due to the way the control power for the motor is connected the starter will then open the circuit if it did not already do so when the first fuse failed. Also, there is a number of 1.57 being bandied about in this thread for the relative horse power of a 3 phase versus single motor for a given current. This number should be 1.73 (The square root of 3. Rob. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 09:30:19 -0500, the renowned "BFoelsch"
wrote: How would you hook up a 3-phase motor to run on 2 phases? A 3-phase motor has 3 wires. If you break one wire, it's running on single phase, not two. Break two wires and it tends to just sit there. How would you hook up a 3 phase motor to run on one phase? I don't care whether they work or not, I just want to see the wiring diagram. Single phase applied to two of the three wires. It works better with capacitors to the third (otherwise unconnected) wire. The motor won't start like this, you either need to give it a spin or use another (starting) capacitor and some switching. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany -- "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Boatanchors | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Boatanchors | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |