| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
spdevel wrote:
And they should do that because... ? ...because a lot of the expense of these devices is in the user-interface, buttons, readouts, etc. If you have a small QRP type of transceiver, it seems like a Palm would save a lot of the expense while maintaining the portability. Is this such a radical idea? Not so much radical as impractical. The reason that radios haven't become exclusively software controlled is the same reason you don't drive your car using a mouse and a keyboard - it's clumsy and impractical. So to make a black box radio with a PC i/f would actually be much more expensive because almost no one would buy it. 73 ... WA7AA -- Anti-spam measu look me up on qrz.com if you need to reply directly |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Palm or pocket pc ?? | Digital | |||
| Palm or pocket pc ?? | Digital | |||
| PDA: Palm or Windows? | Equipment | |||
| PDA: Palm or Windows? | Equipment | |||