Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Conrad wrote:
Opinions regarding Yaesu FT-817ND transceiver? The original 817 had a problem with batteries. The off switch did not actually turn off the power and the finals being able to function from 1.8mHz to 450 mHz went into oscilation and burned out. Has this been fixed? The popular fix at the time was to remove the batteries when the rig was not in use. The biggest problem with the Yaseu is the tiny screen. The ICOM 703 has a much larger screen. The 703 only goes up to 6m though. The 706 does have the same frequency coverage as the Yaseu. You can adjust the output power down to 5 watts, so it may be a viable option. It also has a more features than the Yaesu. If you are using it in a location where size and weight don't matter that much and nor does the increased battery drain, it may be worth the money for it so that you have 100 watt HF output if you need it. The ICOM rigs include a removable front panel, so you can mount them elsewhere and just have the control head at your operating position. Looking at Universal radio the current price for a new rig is $600 for the 817ND, $730 for the 703+ and $945 for the 706IIG. So you have a big range of price, power and features to choose from. The Yaesu is the grandson of the FT-290 and simlar rigs, which were portable VHF/UHF multimode rigs, while the ICOM grew out of shrunken HF rigs, the Kenwood TS-50 being the first. Surprisingly, Kenwood no longer has anything to offer in that line. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM New word I coined 12/13/09, "Sub-Wikipedia" adj, describing knowledge or understanding, as in he has a sub-wikipedia understanding of the situation. i.e possessing less facts or information than can be found in the Wikipedia. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Geoffrey S.
Mendelson wrote: Mark Conrad wrote: Opinions regarding Yaesu FT-817ND transceiver? The original 817 had a problem with batteries. The off switch did not actually turn off the power and the finals being able to function from 1.8mHz to 450 mHz went into oscilation and burned out. Has this been fixed? The popular fix at the time was to remove the batteries when the rig was not in use. The biggest problem with the Yaseu is the tiny screen. The ICOM 703 has a much larger screen. The 703 only goes up to 6m though. The 706 does have the same frequency coverage as the Yaseu. You can adjust the output power down to 5 watts, so it may be a viable option. It also has a more features than the Yaesu. If you are using it in a location where size and weight don't matter that much and nor does the increased battery drain, it may be worth the money for it so that you have 100 watt HF output if you need it. The ICOM rigs include a removable front panel, so you can mount them elsewhere and just have the control head at your operating position. Looking at Universal radio the current price for a new rig is $600 for the 817ND, $730 for the 703+ and $945 for the 706IIG. So you have a big range of price, power and features to choose from. The Yaesu is the grandson of the FT-290 and simlar rigs, which were portable VHF/UHF multimode rigs, while the ICOM grew out of shrunken HF rigs, the Kenwood TS-50 being the first. Surprisingly, Kenwood no longer has anything to offer in that line. Geoff. Thanks for the comprehensive rundown, I will check them all. Regular telephone service in these mountains of northern CA is unreliable, quite a few older folks here are in a real pickle when the phones go out. That is one of the reasons I decided to reactivate my ham ticket. Main reason of course is just out-and-out fun ![]() Mark |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB Yaesu FT-817ND | Equipment | |||
WTB Yaesu FT 817ND / 817 | Equipment | |||
WTB Yaesu FT-817/817ND | Swap | |||
FS: Yaesu FT-817ND HF Mobile | Swap | |||
Yaesu FT-817ND | Dx |