Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Platt wrote:
In article , Thierry To answer me in private use http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/post.htm wrote: Hi, For over 85 years now (Armstrong, 1918) the superheterodyne circuit is at the base of all transceiver without exception I believe. Your belief would be wrong, I think. Superhets are certainly popular. However, there has been a very significant increase in interest in direct-conversion transmitters and receivers over the past few years, and a lot of such designs are now being put into commercial use. Most of the ones I've seen mentioned (in the commercial world at least) are going into UHF and microwave systems - cellphones, 802.11 data radios of various sorts, and so forth. But, among the "most" expert engineers of you, is there a way or does it already exist somewhere some experiments to create a new model of transceiver using another technology ? Direct conversion (as noted above) is one variety. A lot of the simpler QRP CW radios use direct conversion... hams have been building tin-can-sized-or-smaller CW transceivers for years. I've seen some interesting designs which handle sideband, by combining direct-conversion RF front ends with phasing circuitry - an approach used a fair bit back in the 1960s, recently revitalized by the availability of affordable high-crunchpower DSP chips which can implement the phasing method via digital techniques. Some HF radio systems even work by sampling the RF directly, and doing pretty much everything in the DSP... all of the fine tuning, and the various modulations and demodulations are done digitally. And the US Dept. of Defense is sponsoring research into _direct_ DC- to-daylight receivers that sample the RF directly and do everything digitally. This should prove _very_ interesting indeed, as the number of signals handled by the receiver -- and what is done with them -- is pretty much limited only by the speed of the computers processing the signals. Now _there_'s some equipment I want to be able to buy -- preferably at surplus prices, of course. -- Mike Andrews Tired old sysadmin |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only if high speed ADCs become cheaper and have less problems with
internally generated spurious signals. Then the only other problem becomes enough memory to process in near real time the data being generated by signal from DC to Daylight. "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... Receivers of the future will be digital signal processors from the antenna onwards. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only if high speed ADCs become cheaper and have less problems with
internally generated spurious signals. Then the only other problem becomes enough memory to process in near real time the data being generated by signal from DC to Daylight. "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... Receivers of the future will be digital signal processors from the antenna onwards. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't worry. It will be here. Ultimately AM, SSB, FM and Morse will fall
into disuse and all communication will be via wideband, frequency-hopping digital transmissions. China is now wide awake. 15% increase in GNP per annum. Band plans - phooey! --- Reg, G4FGQ ================================= "Dr. Who Cares" wrote - Only if high speed ADCs become cheaper and have less problems with internally generated spurious signals. Then the only other problem becomes enough memory to process in near real time the data being generated by signal from DC to Daylight. "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... Receivers of the future will be digital signal processors from the antenna onwards. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't worry. It will be here. Ultimately AM, SSB, FM and Morse will fall
into disuse and all communication will be via wideband, frequency-hopping digital transmissions. China is now wide awake. 15% increase in GNP per annum. Band plans - phooey! --- Reg, G4FGQ ================================= "Dr. Who Cares" wrote - Only if high speed ADCs become cheaper and have less problems with internally generated spurious signals. Then the only other problem becomes enough memory to process in near real time the data being generated by signal from DC to Daylight. "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... Receivers of the future will be digital signal processors from the antenna onwards. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Message To America's Students: The War, The Draft, Your Future | Digital | |||
Antenna future | Antenna | |||
DRM : the future of shortwaves ? Who knows | Equipment | |||
DRM : the future of shortwaves ? Who knows | Equipment |