Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 12th 04, 03:15 PM
Mike Andrews
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave Platt wrote:
In article ,
Thierry To answer me in private use http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/post.htm wrote:


Hi,

For over 85 years now (Armstrong, 1918) the superheterodyne circuit is at
the base of all transceiver without exception I believe.


Your belief would be wrong, I think.


Superhets are certainly popular. However, there has been a very
significant increase in interest in direct-conversion transmitters and
receivers over the past few years, and a lot of such designs are now
being put into commercial use.


Most of the ones I've seen mentioned (in the commercial world at
least) are going into UHF and microwave systems - cellphones, 802.11
data radios of various sorts, and so forth.


But, among the "most" expert engineers of you, is there a way or does it
already exist somewhere some experiments to create a new model of
transceiver using another technology ?


Direct conversion (as noted above) is one variety. A lot of the
simpler QRP CW radios use direct conversion... hams have been building
tin-can-sized-or-smaller CW transceivers for years.


I've seen some interesting designs which handle sideband, by combining
direct-conversion RF front ends with phasing circuitry - an approach
used a fair bit back in the 1960s, recently revitalized by the
availability of affordable high-crunchpower DSP chips which can
implement the phasing method via digital techniques. Some HF radio
systems even work by sampling the RF directly, and doing pretty much
everything in the DSP... all of the fine tuning, and the various
modulations and demodulations are done digitally.


And the US Dept. of Defense is sponsoring research into _direct_ DC-
to-daylight receivers that sample the RF directly and do everything
digitally. This should prove _very_ interesting indeed, as the number
of signals handled by the receiver -- and what is done with them --
is pretty much limited only by the speed of the computers processing
the signals.

Now _there_'s some equipment I want to be able to buy -- preferably at
surplus prices, of course.

--
Mike Andrews

Tired old sysadmin
  #12   Report Post  
Old March 13th 04, 04:23 AM
Dr. Who Cares
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Only if high speed ADCs become cheaper and have less problems with
internally generated spurious signals. Then the only other problem becomes
enough memory to process in near real time the data being generated by
signal from DC to Daylight.



"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
Receivers of the future will be digital signal processors from the antenna
onwards.




  #13   Report Post  
Old March 13th 04, 04:23 AM
Dr. Who Cares
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Only if high speed ADCs become cheaper and have less problems with
internally generated spurious signals. Then the only other problem becomes
enough memory to process in near real time the data being generated by
signal from DC to Daylight.



"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
Receivers of the future will be digital signal processors from the antenna
onwards.




  #14   Report Post  
Old March 13th 04, 08:33 AM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Don't worry. It will be here. Ultimately AM, SSB, FM and Morse will fall
into disuse and all communication will be via wideband, frequency-hopping
digital transmissions.

China is now wide awake. 15% increase in GNP per annum. Band plans -
phooey!
---
Reg, G4FGQ

=================================

"Dr. Who Cares" wrote -
Only if high speed ADCs become cheaper and have less problems with
internally generated spurious signals. Then the only other problem becomes
enough memory to process in near real time the data being generated by
signal from DC to Daylight.



"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
Receivers of the future will be digital signal processors from the

antenna
onwards.






  #15   Report Post  
Old March 13th 04, 08:33 AM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Don't worry. It will be here. Ultimately AM, SSB, FM and Morse will fall
into disuse and all communication will be via wideband, frequency-hopping
digital transmissions.

China is now wide awake. 15% increase in GNP per annum. Band plans -
phooey!
---
Reg, G4FGQ

=================================

"Dr. Who Cares" wrote -
Only if high speed ADCs become cheaper and have less problems with
internally generated spurious signals. Then the only other problem becomes
enough memory to process in near real time the data being generated by
signal from DC to Daylight.



"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
Receivers of the future will be digital signal processors from the

antenna
onwards.






Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Message To America's Students: The War, The Draft, Your Future Charles Brabham Digital 1 April 12th 04 11:47 AM
Antenna future Art Unwin KB9MZ Antenna 49 January 23rd 04 06:36 PM
DRM : the future of shortwaves ? Who knows Thierry Equipment 10 October 16th 03 06:57 AM
DRM : the future of shortwaves ? Who knows Thierry Equipment 0 October 14th 03 10:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017