Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old July 8th 04, 08:47 PM
JJ
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gary S. wrote:


It is.

Except when it isn't.

Nothing they can do to stop every bit of it.

They can (and should) minimize it, and they should make sure that
transactions are tracable enough so that legal action can be taken if
needed.

They need to monitor, and shut down anyone who does something
improper.

They should really work to make certain that scamsters cannot make up
a new name and get back on the system.


But ebay makes money on scamsters as well, thus they aren't too
concerned about putting forth much effort to shut them down.

  #22   Report Post  
Old July 8th 04, 11:31 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:05:16 GMT, "Lou"
wrote:

I can go along with your idea. There really are NO guarantees. Even with
pay pal - I've "heard" of people getting burned.


As I understand it, the easiest way to get aced by PayPal is
to have the seller send something worthless, but get a proof of
delivery.

According to PayPal's policies, at least a couple of years
back, they would not recover payment if you had a delivery receipt
even if you sold a radio and shipped a box of rocks. I suspect the
only way around this would be if the seller required a receiver's
signature (unlikely) and the receiver withheld the signature until
after the package was opened and verified.

  #23   Report Post  
Old July 8th 04, 11:31 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:05:16 GMT, "Lou"
wrote:

I can go along with your idea. There really are NO guarantees. Even with
pay pal - I've "heard" of people getting burned.


As I understand it, the easiest way to get aced by PayPal is
to have the seller send something worthless, but get a proof of
delivery.

According to PayPal's policies, at least a couple of years
back, they would not recover payment if you had a delivery receipt
even if you sold a radio and shipped a box of rocks. I suspect the
only way around this would be if the seller required a receiver's
signature (unlikely) and the receiver withheld the signature until
after the package was opened and verified.

  #24   Report Post  
Old July 13th 04, 08:44 AM
Lieutenant_Dan
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Just an update:
I have confirmed this all to be 100% true.
Also eBay did nothing to help neither did Paypal I assisted Mrs. Thompson in
filling out the forms for the Postal Inspector's Office to have Mail fraud
charges levied against XE2FLR. This guy even went as far as giving her
positive feedback at eBay saying "thanks!"
This old lady walked right into his trap but it will catch up to him in
time.


  #25   Report Post  
Old July 13th 04, 08:44 AM
Lieutenant_Dan
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Just an update:
I have confirmed this all to be 100% true.
Also eBay did nothing to help neither did Paypal I assisted Mrs. Thompson in
filling out the forms for the Postal Inspector's Office to have Mail fraud
charges levied against XE2FLR. This guy even went as far as giving her
positive feedback at eBay saying "thanks!"
This old lady walked right into his trap but it will catch up to him in
time.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017