Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Steve Terry
writes Mike Cook wrote: Going to trek in Tibet. Would like to take 2-way radios (Motorola Spirit UHF). Is there a published list of available & unavailable frequencies in PRC? Thanks. AFAIK their version of 446PMR is 409MHz SRPR, 20 public channels within 409.750-409.9875 (12.5kHz, 500mW) Same as in HK http://tel_archives.ofca.gov.hk/en/a.../nsp2002p3.pdf Probably the easiest way of getting radios for use in Tibet is to source them locally, and get them shipped to a convenient collection point. China and Hong Kong are certainly not short of manufacturers! -- Ian |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Jackson wrote:
Probably the easiest way of getting radios for use in Tibet is to source them locally, and get them shipped to a convenient collection point. China and Hong Kong are certainly not short of manufacturers! Even for an American in the UK, that would be the best approach, as radios not specifically approved for PMR 446 are not covered by the class licence. For China, it will be part a question of protecting their own industry and partly a national security issue. Given its history, national security is likely to be a particularly important issue in Tibet. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , David Woolley
writes Ian Jackson wrote: Probably the easiest way of getting radios for use in Tibet is to source them locally, and get them shipped to a convenient collection point. China and Hong Kong are certainly not short of manufacturers! Even for an American in the UK, that would be the best approach, as radios not specifically approved for PMR 446 are not covered by the class licence. I note that the OP's intended radio (Motorola Spirit UHF) is 1 channel. 2W. The Chinese public service radios are only 0.5W (and with a tiddly antenna), so even if these are readily available, they might not be quite suitable. For China, it will be part a question of protecting their own industry and partly a national security issue. Importing two-way radios into China would probably not be threatening their own industry. They probably originated there in the first place! Given its history, national security is likely to be a particularly important issue in Tibet. It says in http://tel_archives.ofca.gov.hk/en/a.../nsp2002p3.pdf "In December 2001, the Ministry of Information Industry of China announced that short-range portable radio transceivers, or "walkie-talkies", operating in the band 409.7500 – 409.9875 MHz with transmitter power not exceeding 0.5W were exempted from licensing." Presumably these are legal to use throughout all of China - but you never know. In certain countries, being legal does not guarantee you won't have problems. Only a couple of weeks ago, a German radio amateur, operating absolutely 100% legally when on holiday in Greece, was arrested and hauled before the courts. I believe he is back home, but may need to return for a full trial. http://www.southgatearc.org/news/jun..._arrested_in_g reece.htm and links. -- Ian |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 19, 9:47*am, Ian Jackson
wrote: In message , David Woolley writesIan Jackson wrote: Probably the easiest way of getting radios for use in Tibet is to source them locally, and get them shipped to a convenient collection point. *China and Hong Kong are certainly not short of manufacturers! Even for an American in the UK, that would be the best approach, as radios not specifically approved for PMR 446 are not covered by the class licence. I note that the OP's intended radio (Motorola Spirit UHF) is 1 channel. 2W. The Chinese public service radios are only 0.5W (and with a tiddly antenna), so even if these are readily available, they might not be quite suitable. For China, it will be part a question of protecting their own industry and partly a national security issue. Importing two-way radios into China would probably not be threatening their own industry. They probably originated there in the first place! Given its history, national security is likely to be a particularly important issue in Tibet. It says inhttp://tel_archives.ofca.gov.hk/en/ad-comm/tsac/ns-paper/nsp2002p3.pdf "In December 2001, the Ministry of Information Industry of China announced that short-range portable radio transceivers, or "walkie-talkies", operating in the band 409.7500 – 409.9875 MHz with transmitter power not exceeding 0.5W were exempted from licensing." Presumably these are legal to use throughout all of China - but you never know. In certain countries, being legal does not guarantee you won't have problems. Only a couple of weeks ago, a German radio amateur, operating absolutely 100% legally when on holiday in Greece, was arrested and hauled before the courts. I believe he is back home, but may need to return for a full trial. http://www.southgatearc.org/news/jun..._arrested_in_g reece.htm and links. -- Ian If he was in the rightr then he was in the right. Holiday insurance should cover that and I'd be seeking legal redress from the Greeks if there are any avenues to pursue. As I've always preached - take no s***t from anyone especially when you have right on your side. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff wrote:
Even for an American in the UK, that would be the best approach, as radios not specifically approved for PMR 446 are not covered by the class licence. That is not the case, type approval went out of the window some years ago now. The radio but just meet the relevant Interface Requirement. Specific approval is not required. Unless Ofcom has failed to update their information, it also has to have things like a permanently attached antenna, absolute power limits, etc., basically to make it non-trivial to modify outside of the specification. As pointed out elsewhere, the proposed equipment doesn't comply with those conditions, so wouldn't have been legal for PMR 446 use. I used approved loosely, to mean designed to meet the conditions of the licence exemption. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19/06/12 9:30 PM, David Woolley wrote:
Unless Ofcom has failed to update their information, it also has to have things like a permanently attached antenna, Where in the current interface requirement does it say anything about a permanently attached antenna? http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/bin...nts/IR2009.pdf Laurie |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why don't you query the various Chinese manufacturers that make HTs?
Tell them if it is possible to purchase these HTs in China and use them in China Yes maybe you cannot import anything but buying them may be something too ] Quote:
|
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Did I mention that Democratic People's Republic of Korea | Shortwave | |||
I wish, Philippines frequencies list | Scanner | |||
New A09 Aoki Bi-List of Shortwave Frequencies | Shortwave | |||
list of frequencies | Shortwave | |||
5040kHz - CHINA: Fujian People's Broadcast Service @0140 UTC- | Shortwave |