Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Rob
writes Bob E wrote: And another thousand points for answering the question--which was about the cable's specs, NOT ABOUT ITS APPROPRIATENESS FOR A SPECIFIC APPLICATION. Your posting appeared on usenet different from your own intention. From your posting: "How does this affect the performance? I'm looking at 1 GHz (HDTV use)." That clearly is a question about appropriateness for a specific application. You did not ask about the loss, you asked about the performance. So that means "they may be loss, but does it affect the results". The answer clearly is: it depends on further details, like what margin you have on the signal. Shouting does not help you, just face the facts. OK, Bob E - it appears that the ball is in your court. In the interests of peace and harmony, and to prevent confusion, please could you please tell us exactly (and I mean EXACTLY) which RG-6 vs RG-6Q parameters you are concerned about? -- Ian --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Connecting coax shield to tower near top | Antenna | |||
High Quality {Low Noise} Coax Cable for Shortwave Listening (SWL) Antennas ? - - - Why Not Quad-Shield RG6 ! | Shortwave | |||
soldering coax shield | Equipment | |||
soldering coax shield | Homebrew | |||
soldering coax shield | Homebrew |