Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 3/18/2014 5:11 AM, Rob wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote: That was the major impetus over here to switch to digital - to free up major bandspace in the VHF and UHF spectrums. The 'freeing-up' is because each QAM multiplexed transport stream carries typically up to 6 TV channels and 6 high-quality stereo radio channels. Ah, so the channel is effectively only 1Mhz wide then. That is only an "average" that you get when you divide the total bandwidth by the number of TV programmes transmitted. As multiple TV programmes are transmitted on a single channel, that occupies the width of a classical analog channel that could transmit only a single programme, more programmes can be put in the same bandwidth. However, to receive one of them you really need to receive the entire channel (several MHz wide), so all link budget calculations should be based on the full bandwidth. Later, the receiver throws away most of the bits it has received and decodes only the information for one of the TV programmes. You need to check on how the signals are transmitted. You seem claim to know a lot about how U.S. TV works, even though you're thousands of miles away. But then you know a lot more about my job, the people I work with, and the tools I use than I do. Come on over and do my job for about ten years. Then maybe, just maybe, you'll be qualified to comment on it. Otherwise, I just consider you a troll. I know that the system used in the USA is different from what it is here, but this mostly concerns the modulation method used for terrestrial transmissions. Both methods (8VSB and COFDM) have their merit, and this was discussed a lot in the past. The same-frequency network we have in operation here would not be possible with 8VSB, but in long reach operation 8VSB is claimed to be better. However, the general principle of using a full classical analog channel (8 MHz here, 6 MHz for you) in its entirety to transmit a multiplexed transport stream conveying several TV programmes is the same. SCPC systems (where a transport rate is chosen to just fit the bitrate required for a single programme, and the resulting channel bandwith is correspondingly reduced) is used on some satellites, mainly for satellite newsgathering and other ad-hoc links, and sometimes for DTH transmission from really small stations. It is not popular because it wastes bandwidth and transponder output power headroom. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Connecting coax shield to tower near top | Antenna | |||
High Quality {Low Noise} Coax Cable for Shortwave Listening (SWL) Antennas ? - - - Why Not Quad-Shield RG6 ! | Shortwave | |||
soldering coax shield | Equipment | |||
soldering coax shield | Homebrew | |||
soldering coax shield | Homebrew |