Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
FT450D?
I/ve been studying the spec of this rig and am surprised at the
degree of provision of facilities, including narrow CW filters at the outset and the included automatic ATU. But, assuming that one has space available for a shack, is it necessary for everything to be so compact? For example, fiddley little buttons and knobs? My own shack (mainly a museum) covers a whole wall with 5 sets of shelves and countless boxes beneath the tables, so compaction is not an issue. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
FT450D?
"gareth" wrote in message ... I/ve been studying the spec of this rig and am surprised at the degree of provision of facilities, including narrow CW filters at the outset and the included automatic ATU. But, assuming that one has space available for a shack, is it necessary for everything to be so compact? For example, fiddley little buttons and knobs? My own shack (mainly a museum) covers a whole wall with 5 sets of shelves and countless boxes beneath the tables, so compaction is not an issue. I hate the small sets also. I have a large computer type desk and the main rig is an Icom 746. It does have a reasonable large display,but could use larger knobs and buttons with lables on them large enough to see from a distance. Too bad Icom does not have a rig like that any more in the same price range. Does everything up to 2 meters. If they had just put 440 in it they could probably have sold a lot of them. Could not have been much of a problem as the later 706 rigs had it. For the small packages, rigs such as the Icom 706 I have is fine. I guess they are trying to shave a dollar or so off the ammount of materials used in the home type rigs. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
FT450D?
"Brian Morrison" wrote in message
... On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 16:11:43 -0000 gareth wrote: I/ve been studying the spec of this rig and am surprised at the degree of provision of facilities, including narrow CW filters at the outset and the included automatic ATU. IF DSP, so adding in narrow filters is relatively cost-free. But, assuming that one has space available for a shack, is it necessary for everything to be so compact? For example, fiddley little buttons and knobs? If controlled via a PC connection then most of the fiddling with menus can be obviated. Houses are smaller than they were, it's fairly rare for people to have enough space so radio is just another thing to fit in the available space. An advantage of living in an old house? There are many disadvantages, high heating bills being only one of them. -- ;-) .. 73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint. .. http://turner-smith.co.uk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|