Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24/02/2015 16:57, gareth wrote:
"Iain Young, G7III" wrote in message ... On 24/02/15 12:47, gareth wrote: What is the point of digital voice when there are already AM, SSB and FM for those who want to appear indistinguishable from CBers? Technical developments of new encoding techniques that reduce required bandwidth, just as SSB improved over AM. You can get CODEC2 down to way less than an SSB signal quite easily. Those who subscribe to these digital voice apparatuses lack a single clue about any underlying technical development Sweeping statement. I have used digital voice and I have built my own kit (non-ham but basically the same as a digital voice front end) and wrote my own codecs (both fractal lossy and various lossless codecs). If you have trouble sleeping at night I am sure I can dig out my dissertation and forward it. The technology is dated (I built my first one using thick-film technology - that dates it a little) but the underlying work is still valid. Andy |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|