Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24/02/2015 17:00, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
But you forget compression. For instance, unless there is a scene change, the vast majority of a television picture does not change from frame to frame. Even if the camera moves, the picture shifts but doesn't change all that much. Why waste all of that bandwidth resending information the receiver already has? Which is why, on cheaper televisions, the picture tesselates when showing random images such as rain, fire, waterfalls etc. The true test of a quality television is to watch a waterfall or flames and see it pin-sharp. Cheaper TVs use cheap lower-powered decoding systems and for complex images they do not have enough time to fully decode the image before the next frame arrives. Andy |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|