On 25/02/15 11:38, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
On 25/02/15 10:39, gareth wrote:
"rickman" wrote in message
...

I thought it might be that, but it still makes no sense to me. Who or how
does changing the direction of rotation of a rotating vector change its
"size". Are you defining size as the rotation so that going from a + to
a - is like reversing the direction of a vector? I think most people
would consider the "size" of a vector to be the magnitude which is
independent of phase angle and so rotation, no?

Perhaps you can explain this with a little math?

Not my gibberish, refer to the original posting ...

-----ooooo-----

From: "Brian Reay"
Newsgroups: alt.engineering.electrical,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Phase noise
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 10:21:54 -0000
Message-ID:


The term e^(-jwt) isn't some magical time machine relating to "minus
time", e^(-jwt) is simply another way of writing 1/(e^jwt) which
is a value that decreases as t increasing.



See, he has trimmed his part, which clearly didn't refer to the true
usage of negative frequency. I simply over estimated is ability to grasp
the meaning of what I'd said without more detail. This was obvious as he
also claimed claimed that division was impossible with complex numbers.

He will attempt to drag this out, as he always does, but a look in the
archive will show his claims to be nonsense. He drags this up from time
to time, generally after a drubbing, He really doesn't like being proven
wrong. Look at the date, he has been dragging this up with boring
regularity since then. I've lost count of the times it has been explained
to him. He has finally got the idea of the clockwise rotating phasor. He
struggled with the idea that, as the phasor rotated, the angle became
more negative, and thus decreased. eg -20 -10

That Gareth is still stewing over the correction you gave him 11 years ago
underlines his mental instability.



It is his way of trying to cope with is own failings. If you read his
Westinghouse rant, you will see in his own words, a summary of how he
conducts himself. He has repeated it for other places. It is easy to see
why he hasn't been successful and is facing a grim future- bouncing of
the walls of his Spartan hovel.

and is facing a grim future- bouncing of
the walls of his Spartan hovel.



that is your best put down yet ! .... kwality

On 25/02/15 12:13, Jim GM4DHJ... wrote:

and is facing a grim future- bouncing of
the walls of his Spartan hovel.

that is your best put down yet ! .... kwality

I've no idea who you're responding to, Jim, but whatever is
'future-bouncing'? And what has it got to do with walls?


--
Spike

"Hard cases, it has frequently been observed, are apt to introduce bad
law". Judge Rolfe

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
It is his way of trying to cope with is own failings. If you read his
Westinghouse rant, you will see in his own words, a summary of how he
conducts himself. He has repeated it for other places. It is easy to see
why he hasn't been successful and is facing a grim future- bouncing of the
walls of his Spartan hovel.

What's up this morning, brian, that has you blurting out childish remarks
at every turn? Why are you so sad and bitter?

It does nothing for your reputation as a technical aficionado when you
decline to discuss technical issues and resort to personal abuse at every
turn.

Shame on you.

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
It is easy to see why he hasn't been successful and is facing a grim
future- bouncing of the walls of his Spartan hovel.


Once again your desperation comes to the fore that others should
be envious of your money and your house.

In your posts to Usenet, you come across as someone who is
deeply unhappy about himself and the environment within
which he finds himself.

You seem to be very insecure with your need to make yourself
feel better by reeling off insults directed at others.

Is there any way in which we, your fellow subscribers to this NG, can
help you to lift yourself out of your mental doldrums and assist you to
assume the mantle
of adulthood?