On 2/25/2015 4:43 AM, Brian Reay wrote:
On 25/02/15 08:53, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote:
rickman wrote:


Perhaps you can explain this with a little math?

Sadly, Gareth absolutely cannot explain it. He doesn't remotely
understand
anything he's talking about, as per.


That is a major part of his problem. He just isn't up to the level of
technical stuff he aspires to, in fact he has glaring gaps in even the
basics.

I don't see that as a fault. I often tackle difficult issues I don't
understand in the hope of learning more.


Rather than try and learn, he tries to bluff that he knows far more than
he does. When he is shown to be a charlatan, he turns to abuse. Even
that is predictable in the path it will take, including his most extreme
steps.

Yeah, well, that isn't so good. But it is interesting that so many are
so happy to pile on and give the guy grief.


As you say, he is best ignored, although some of his whacky theories
have given me a good laugh from time to time.

It's good to eat your vegetables too, but how many actually do it?

--

Rick