En el artículo ple.org
, Michael Black escribió:

He could post to the rec.radio.amateur.moderated, and he isn't likely to
get an answer. Except for the filler crossposted between there and other
newsgroups, it's a pretty dead newsgroup, has been since the beginning.

He (and you and anyone else) is welcome in uk.radio.amateur.moderated.
It's fairly low-traffic at the moment, but the discussions so far have
been of high quality. Quality, not quantity.

Moderation ensures that posts from the demented idiot who wrecks
uk.radio.amateur complete with malicious crossposts to .antenna,
..equipment, .homebrew etc. to maximise the annoyance factor simply don't
see the light of day.

Come along and say hello.

--
(\_/)
(='.'=) Bunny says: Windows 10? Nein danke!
(")_(")

On 29/01/2016 00:45, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artículo ple.org
, Michael Black escribió:

He could post to the rec.radio.amateur.moderated, and he isn't likely to
get an answer. Except for the filler crossposted between there and other
newsgroups, it's a pretty dead newsgroup, has been since the beginning.

He (and you and anyone else) is welcome in uk.radio.amateur.moderated.
It's fairly low-traffic at the moment, but the discussions so far have
been of high quality. Quality, not quantity.

Especially if you like computers, fixing the causes of broken web sites,
or reading the occasional snow report. There's rather less mention of
Amateur Radio topics. However, as the number of posts declines after the
initial enthusiasm has worn off, the group needs all the posts it can
get. Three posters, one of which has limited technical knowledge, post
one quarter of al traffic to date. Half of the 58 contributors to date
post less than once a week. A disturbing proportion of those that voted
for the group have neither posted at all, or posted a few times and have
since disappeared

Moderation ensures that posts from the demented idiot who wrecks
uk.radio.amateur complete with malicious crossposts to .antenna,
..equipment, .homebrew etc. to maximise the annoyance factor simply don't
see the light of day.

That also goes for those who have spent the last three years wrecking
havoc on UKRA. But it should be noted that these people post far more on
UKRA than UKRAM. I'm not of the psychopathology that drives these
actions, but it's interesting to watch.

Come along and say hello.

Please do.

--
Spike

"They thought that because they had power, they had wisdom"

- with apologies to Stephen Vincent Benet

In message , Spike
writes
On 29/01/2016 00:45, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artículo ple.org
, Michael Black escribió:

He could post to the rec.radio.amateur.moderated, and he isn't likely to
get an answer. Except for the filler crossposted between there and other
newsgroups, it's a pretty dead newsgroup, has been since the beginning.

He (and you and anyone else) is welcome in uk.radio.amateur.moderated.
It's fairly low-traffic at the moment, but the discussions so far have
been of high quality. Quality, not quantity.

Especially if you like computers, fixing the causes of broken web
sites, or reading the occasional snow report. There's rather less
mention of Amateur Radio topics.

You continue to fail to understand that uk.r.a.m is not a 100%
strictly-highy-technical-only-about-amateur-radio newsgroup. It's
supposed to like the uk.r.a cesspool could be - if it wasn't for all the
****.

However, as the number of posts declines after the initial enthusiasm
has worn off, the group needs all the posts it can get. Three posters,
one of which has limited technical knowledge, post one quarter of al
traffic to date. Half of the 58 contributors to date post less than
once a week. A disturbing proportion of those that voted for the group
have neither posted at all, or posted a few times and have since disappeared

I have to admit that I really can't work up the enthusiasm to be
'disturbed' by it.

Moderation ensures that posts from the demented idiot who wrecks
uk.radio.amateur complete with malicious crossposts to .antenna,
..equipment, .homebrew etc. to maximise the annoyance factor simply don't
see the light of day.

That also goes for those who have spent the last three years wrecking
havoc on UKRA. But it should be noted that these people post far more
on UKRA than UKRAM. I'm not of the psychopathology that drives these
actions, but it's interesting to watch.

If I could make an observation:
I might be wrong, but I get the impression that since the creation of
uk.r.a.m, in this cesspit there actually seems to have been an increase
in the number of ****-free posts. Maybe some are learning from
uk.r.a.m's example?

Come along and say hello.

Please do.

Oh, do come along. You actually might enjoy it!
--
Ian

"Ian Jackson" wrote in message
...
If I could make an observation:
I might be wrong, but I get the impression that since the creation of
uk.r.a.m, in this cesspit there actually seems to have been an increase in
the number of ****-free posts. Maybe some are learning from uk.r.a.m's
example?

You are wrong, for all that has happened is that we who stand up for the
traditions
of amateur radio have continued in that vein whereas the troublemakers who
voted for
UKRAM, because they couldn't behave unless the kindergarten teacher was
standing over them, have been ostracised.

So the proportion of decent civilised posts may well have increased, but
only
because the troublemakers have been ostracised and, presumably, have
stopped posting now that they no longer receive the oxygen of publicity.

"gareth" wrote in message
...
"Ian Jackson" wrote in message
...
If I could make an observation:
I might be wrong, but I get the impression that since the creation of
uk.r.a.m, in this cesspit there actually seems to have been an increase
in the number of ****-free posts. Maybe some are learning from uk.r.a.m's
example?

You are wrong, for all that has happened is that we who stand up for the
traditions
of amateur radio have continued in that vein whereas the troublemakers who
voted for
UKRAM, because they couldn't behave unless the kindergarten teacher was
standing over them, have been ostracised.

So the proportion of decent civilised posts may well have increased, but
only
because the troublemakers have been ostracised and, presumably, have
stopped posting now that they no longer receive the oxygen of publicity.




naw brian just taunted you......

"Jim GM4DHJ ..." wrote in message
...
"gareth" wrote in message
...
"Ian Jackson" wrote in message
...
If I could make an observation:
I might be wrong, but I get the impression that since the creation of
uk.r.a.m, in this cesspit there actually seems to have been an increase
in the number of ****-free posts. Maybe some are learning from
uk.r.a.m's example?
You are wrong, for all that has happened is that we who stand up for the
traditions
of amateur radio have continued in that vein whereas the troublemakers
who voted for
UKRAM, because they couldn't behave unless the kindergarten teacher was
standing over them, have been ostracised.
So the proportion of decent civilised posts may well have increased, but
only
because the troublemakers have been ostracised and, presumably, have
stopped posting now that they no longer receive the oxygen of publicity.
naw brian just taunted you......

I'll have to take your word for that, but without further comment.

"gareth" wrote in message
...
"Jim GM4DHJ ..." wrote in message
...
"gareth" wrote in message
...
"Ian Jackson" wrote in message
...
If I could make an observation:
I might be wrong, but I get the impression that since the creation of
uk.r.a.m, in this cesspit there actually seems to have been an increase
in the number of ****-free posts. Maybe some are learning from
uk.r.a.m's example?
You are wrong, for all that has happened is that we who stand up for the
traditions
of amateur radio have continued in that vein whereas the troublemakers
who voted for
UKRAM, because they couldn't behave unless the kindergarten teacher was
standing over them, have been ostracised.
So the proportion of decent civilised posts may well have increased, but
only
because the troublemakers have been ostracised and, presumably, have
stopped posting now that they no longer receive the oxygen of publicity.
naw brian just taunted you......

I'll have to take your word for that, but without further comment.



it was the beginners house taunt .....

If I could make an observation:
I might be wrong, but I get the impression that since the creation of
uk.r.a.m, in this cesspit there actually seems to have been an increase in
the number of ****-free posts. Maybe some are learning from uk.r.a.m's
example?

no brian is still making them and trying to bate gareth but gareth is not
rising to it......look at his katie hopkins post....he just can't leave it
alone......proves he is one of the culprits ....

Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Spike writes
On 29/01/2016 00:45, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artÃ*culo ple.org
, Michael Black escribió:

He could post to the rec.radio.amateur.moderated, and he isn't likely to
get an answer. Except for the filler crossposted between there and other
newsgroups, it's a pretty dead newsgroup, has been since the beginning.

He (and you and anyone else) is welcome in uk.radio.amateur.moderated.
It's fairly low-traffic at the moment, but the discussions so far have
been of high quality. Quality, not quantity.

Especially if you like computers, fixing the causes of broken web
sites, or reading the occasional snow report. There's rather less
mention of Amateur Radio topics.

You continue to fail to understand that uk.r.a.m is not a 100%
strictly-highy-technical-only-about-amateur-radio newsgroup. It's
supposed to like the uk.r.a cesspool could be - if it wasn't for all the ****.

AFAICR, it was never postulated by the proponent or moderators during the
RFD that ukram would be technical matters only. Quite the opposite. Spike
doesn't often let reality intrude on his axe grinding, though, particularly
not when he's got this much sand in his vagina.


However, as the number of posts declines after the initial enthusiasm
has worn off, the group needs all the posts it can get. Three posters,
one of which has limited technical knowledge, post one quarter of al
traffic to date. Half of the 58 contributors to date post less than
once a week. A disturbing proportion of those that voted for the
group have neither posted at all, or posted a few times and have since disappeared

I have to admit that I really can't work up the enthusiasm to be 'disturbed' by it.

Moderation ensures that posts from the demented idiot who wrecks
uk.radio.amateur complete with malicious crossposts to .antenna,
..equipment, .homebrew etc. to maximise the annoyance factor simply don't
see the light of day.

That also goes for those who have spent the last three years wrecking
havoc on UKRA. But it should be noted that these people post far more
on UKRA than UKRAM. I'm not of the psychopathology that drives these
actions, but it's interesting to watch.

If I could make an observation:
I might be wrong, but I get the impression that since the creation of
uk.r.a.m, in this cesspit there actually seems to have been an increase
in the number of ****-free posts. Maybe some are learning from uk.r.a.m's example?

Project Shun has done wonders for the group, again.


Come along and say hello.

Please do.

Oh, do come along. You actually might enjoy it!

He's enjoying moaning about it much more than he ever would using it!

--
STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur

Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artÃ*culo ple.org
, Michael Black escribió:

He could post to the rec.radio.amateur.moderated, and he isn't likely to
get an answer. Except for the filler crossposted between there and other
newsgroups, it's a pretty dead newsgroup, has been since the beginning.

He (and you and anyone else) is welcome in uk.radio.amateur.moderated.
It's fairly low-traffic at the moment, but the discussions so far have
been of high quality. Quality, not quantity.

Indeed. There are some unsophisticated types who think that the tsunami of
**** in the cesspit is in some way preferable to the comparatively modest
volume of ukram posts, but those perverts are clearly fools.

Moderation ensures that posts from the demented idiot who wrecks
uk.radio.amateur complete with malicious crossposts to .antenna,
.equipment, .homebrew etc. to maximise the annoyance factor simply don't
see the light of day.

He knows that he hasn't got the self-control to adhere to the modpol and
that his ego couldn't handle having posts rejected, so he's given ukram a
wide-berth so far, and that's a win for us decent folk in itself.

Come along and say hello.

All are welcome.

--
STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur