Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/6/2016 4:49 PM, Michael Black wrote:
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016, Brian Howie wrote: In message ple.org, Michael Black writes On Sat, 6 Feb 2016, gareth wrote: "Brian Howie" wrote in message ... In message , gareth writes Presumably those SDR rigs which do not work on the IF but directly from antennae must have, separately from the DSP processor, some semblance of a DDS generator (but without the final DAC) to act as the equivalent of the VFO, for I cannot perceive that a fractional-Hz tuning rate could be achieved with machine code running in the DSP processor? I'm not an expert ,but I think what you're asking is " how is the local oscillator generated" in a direct conversion SDR and "what determines its resolution" There is an example here, :- http://www.radioelementi.it/public/saqrx.pdf The "c" source code is here,which I can just about understand ( My software background is FORTRAN and Matlab) :- https://sites.google.com/site/sm6lkm/saqrx/ Softies shouldn't have a problem with it although I was able to mess about with it and recompile it successfully In this case the spectrum is dc to 22050Hz in 512 steps. It's not the LO precision ( it's floating point in this one) that limits it but the size of the FFT , the sample rate and thus the record length, that sets the minimum FFT bin width . This one tunes in lumps of about 43Hz Thank-you Brian, but what you have URLed is already at baseband, being VLF. I thought that was the norm, not much doing A/D at signal frequency. Initially, it was too fast for the hardware to handle, but there are probably some good reasons still to downconvert. Michael Correct , but Gareth asked about the software equivalent of a DDS frequency synthesiser or VFO. The "directly from antenna" in his post threw me. If there's a heterodyne conversion, which is what he was asking I see now, then there has to some sort of local oscillator. The way I read it was that he was asking how to tune something that directly converted to digital. Sorry. I'm a bit confused by the many comments about the original post, but there is such a thing as a direct down conversion receiver. As long as the input is sampled fast enough for the signal frequency or at least fast enough for the bandwidth when using sub-sampling and there are adequate filters on the input, this can work. The trouble is the filtering. I believe that is why IF frequencies have been used, to filter the signal more easily. -- Rick |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|