Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
. A couple other guys who know what they're talking about are also
recommending that same arrangement. 50 ohms on the cable and 50 ohms on the antenna --- perfect. No need for a matching device, I like it. But aren't dipole-like configurations supposed to present 73 ohms of load? Why is a 1/4 wave groundplane only 50 ohms? The simplest ground-plane-style antenna has its radials sticking out sideways. It's a monopole. The actual radiator is only half as long as a dipole, and thus has only half as much radiation resistance, and the feedpoint impedance is only half as much as that of a dipole. It's on the order of 35 ohms or so. If you bend the radials until they point straight down, you've got a center-fed dipole with the feedline running up the center. Feedpoint impedance is somewhere around 70 ohms. Feedpoint resistance of anywhere from 35 to 70 ohms are available via the obvious compromise - just bend the radials down less (for lower resistances) or more (for higher resistances). In most installations, radials bent downwards at an angle of about 45 degrees result in a 50-ohm resonant feedpoint resistance. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Dipole vs. Delta loop vs. Quad loop -pratical experience | Antenna | |||
Shortwave random-wire antenna question | Shortwave | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
Dipole Next To Home-Is That A Problem?? | Antenna |