Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Timewave ANC-4 or MFJ-1026
I found nothing wrong with the fit and finish of my 1026. Just be aware
that the 1026 is not easy to adjust and can easily appear not to be working if the sense antenna is not adequate and if the operator doesn't grasp the correct adjustment procedure. Make sure the interfering signal can be heard well on the sense antenna. 73, K8AC "Justín Käse" wrote in message news:4237ec25.2253528@chupacabra... In posted on Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:58:47 -0600, dbu wrote: I understand the MFJ is better, but I can't say for sure as I don't own one. It's cheaper by about ten bucks, but MFJ's reputation for poor fit and finish might offset that. -- JK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Yaesu SP-5 w/ Timewave DSP 59Y | Equipment | |||
FS: Yaesu SP-5 w/ Timewave DSP 59Y | Equipment | |||
FS: Yaesu SP-5 w/ Timewave DSP 59Y | Equipment | |||
For Sale TimeWave DSP-59+ DSP unit | Scanner | |||
FS: Timewave DSP 59+ External DSP Unit | Swap |