Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Take a look at this piece of ****. And the guy who put it up is proud of
it. How many serious problems can you spot? http://deepsouthnet.net/tower.html -- ----- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Joe S." wrote in :
Take a look at this piece of ****. And the guy who put it up is proud of it. How many serious problems can you spot? http://deepsouthnet.net/tower.html I was starting to defend this guy a bit. After all, despite the crappy base, at least it was adequately guyed...... then I took a close look at his guy supports.... some might thin trees, if at least one isn't a plant! You were right. Nothing to brag about. I sure wouldn't want to climb it. Ed K7AAT |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 02:13:51 GMT, Ed wrote:
"Joe S." wrote in : Take a look at this piece of ****. And the guy who put it up is proud of it. How many serious problems can you spot? http://deepsouthnet.net/tower.html I was starting to defend this guy a bit. After all, despite the crappy base, at least it was adequately guyed...... then I took a close look at his guy supports.... some might thin trees, if at least one isn't a plant! You were right. Nothing to brag about. I sure wouldn't want to climb it. The "deepsouth" part told me just about all I needed to know.... |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please do tell what are the problems with this install? So I don't make
the same mistakes. 73 KC8OJU |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ray13" wrote in message
oups.com... Please do tell what are the problems with this install? So I don't make the same mistakes. 73 KC8OJU Apart from inadequate guying, the base should be buried well below the bottom triangular plate. The tower manufacturer spec's would give details. That tower is going to land on someone's head first storm. Glad it's not my neighborhood. Ken ZL1WKT |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Taylor wrote:
"ray13" wrote in message oups.com... Please do tell what are the problems with this install? So I don't make the same mistakes. 73 KC8OJU Apart from inadequate guying, the base should be buried well below the bottom triangular plate. The tower manufacturer spec's would give details. That tower is going to land on someone's head first storm. Glad it's not my neighborhood. Ken ZL1WKT He's got pretty high-res pictures, I zoomed one and he's not only got no thimbles for the guys at the turnbuckles, he's got his clamps on backwards (the saddles are intended to go against the load-bearing side of the cable). Pretty simple issues, wonder what the case is for more involved ones.. John |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
With the very light antenna load I don't see any issues. Certainly if a tree
falls over there might be so would it be so if it was guyed to ground anchor points and a nearby tree still fell on it. I think you guys are making a mountain out of a mole hill. I suppose also if a Boeing 747 crash-landed in this guys yard there would be an issue as well..but come on guys...this is no big deal so let's be practical. Frankly I've seen a lot worse and they have been up for years. And, moreover, if everyone erected strictly according to Rohn standards few of us could afford a simple 50 footer! Obviously this Joe S. guy has no life since he has gone out of his way to start a new thread bashing this fella. -- "Joe S." wrote in message ... Take a look at this piece of ****. And the guy who put it up is proud of it. How many serious problems can you spot? http://deepsouthnet.net/tower.html -- ----- |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() With the very light antenna load I don't see any issues. Certainly if a tree falls over there might be so would it be so if it was guyed to ground anchor points and a nearby tree still fell on it. I think you guys are making a mountain out of a mole hill. I suppose also if a Boeing 747 crash-landed in this guys yard there would be an issue as well..but come on guys...this is no big deal so let's be practical. Frankly I've seen a lot worse and they have been up for years. And, moreover, if everyone erected strictly according to Rohn standards few of us could afford a simple 50 footer! You apparently have little understanding of safe tower installation requirements, regardless of factory specs. This isn't a simple 50 foot installation... its a 90 foot tower, and when it comes down, its going to have a big effect on the neighbors. The wind loading of that tower preempts any problems with antenna loading. Given the poor base, and especially the lousey guying supports, its an accident waiting to happen. Ed |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed" wrote in message
. 92.175... With the very light antenna load I don't see any issues. Certainly if a tree falls over there might be so would it be so if it was guyed to ground anchor points and a nearby tree still fell on it. I think you guys are making a mountain out of a mole hill. I suppose also if a Boeing 747 crash-landed in this guys yard there would be an issue as well..but come on guys...this is no big deal so let's be practical. Frankly I've seen a lot worse and they have been up for years. And, moreover, if everyone erected strictly according to Rohn standards few of us could afford a simple 50 footer! You apparently have little understanding of safe tower installation requirements, regardless of factory specs. This isn't a simple 50 foot installation... its a 90 foot tower, and when it comes down, its going to have a big effect on the neighbors. The wind loading of that tower preempts any problems with antenna loading. Given the poor base, and especially the lousey guying supports, its an accident waiting to happen. Ed Thanks for saying it. Three four-foot deep lumps of concrete are not a sufficient anchor for a load like that. I gather there's a bit of wind every so often in MI? Those feet will pop out like corks. Here's some guys who thought it through a little better: http://klickitat.ee.washington.edu/Tower/ This data is for self-supporting towers but it's interesting to note: http://www.anwireless.com/tower.html#foundation This is sorta relevant (it's a much bigger tower but is just plain neat: http://greyfort.com/gallery/album12?page=3) I mean, sure, we've all put up a dodgy 'tower' (I think my biggest self-made piece of crap was maybe 8 metres high, and at least I was the only one hurt during removal!), but this is serious ****, it could easily kill people when it comes down. When, not if. Ken ZL1WKT |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Ken Taylor wrote: "Ed" wrote in message . 92.175... With the very light antenna load I don't see any issues. Certainly if a tree falls over there might be so would it be so if it was guyed to ground anchor points and a nearby tree still fell on it. I think you guys are making a mountain out of a mole hill. I suppose also if a Boeing 747 crash-landed in this guys yard there would be an issue as well..but come on guys...this is no big deal so let's be practical. Frankly I've seen a lot worse and they have been up for years. And, moreover, if everyone erected strictly according to Rohn standards few of us could afford a simple 50 footer! You apparently have little understanding of safe tower installation requirements, regardless of factory specs. This isn't a simple 50 foot installation... its a 90 foot tower, and when it comes down, its going to have a big effect on the neighbors. The wind loading of that tower preempts any problems with antenna loading. Given the poor base, and especially the lousey guying supports, its an accident waiting to happen. Ed Thanks for saying it. Three four-foot deep lumps of concrete are not a sufficient anchor for a load like that. I gather there's a bit of wind every so often in MI? Those feet will pop out like corks. Here's some guys who thought it through a little better: http://klickitat.ee.washington.edu/Tower/ This data is for self-supporting towers but it's interesting to note: http://www.anwireless.com/tower.html#foundation This is sorta relevant (it's a much bigger tower but is just plain neat: http://greyfort.com/gallery/album12?page=3) I mean, sure, we've all put up a dodgy 'tower' (I think my biggest self-made piece of crap was maybe 8 metres high, and at least I was the only one hurt during removal!), but this is serious ****, it could easily kill people when it comes down. When, not if. Ken ZL1WKT With this being a guyed tower I find it hard to believe that the feet will come out of the ground or do anything but sink farther into the ground do to the weight of the tower and the soft soil. I put up a temporary tower in 1978 that is still standing. It is 50 foot high and is sitting right on the ground (about 8 inches in now). I have two sets of guy wires. I have 4 ants on it one being a 42 foot 20 Meter KLM. Also one leg is tied to a tree and one tied to an anchor in the roof of my wife's shop. The third in tied to two posts that are driven in the ground about 3 foot. Now remember this was my temporary install of almost 30 years ago. Someday soon I am expecting to make it more permanent but....... Ron WA0KDS |