Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 27th 05, 02:49 AM
Joe S.
 
Posts: n/a
Default And the guy who put this up is proud of it

Take a look at this piece of ****. And the guy who put it up is proud of
it.

How many serious problems can you spot?

http://deepsouthnet.net/tower.html

--

-----


  #2   Report Post  
Old June 27th 05, 03:13 AM
Ed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Joe S." wrote in :

Take a look at this piece of ****. And the guy who put it up is proud of
it.

How many serious problems can you spot?

http://deepsouthnet.net/tower.html



I was starting to defend this guy a bit. After all, despite the crappy
base, at least it was adequately guyed...... then I took a close look at
his guy supports.... some might thin trees, if at least one isn't a plant!

You were right. Nothing to brag about. I sure wouldn't want to climb
it.



Ed K7AAT
  #3   Report Post  
Old June 28th 05, 03:08 AM
drwxr-xr-x
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 02:13:51 GMT, Ed wrote:
"Joe S." wrote in :

Take a look at this piece of ****. And the guy who put it up is proud of
it.
How many serious problems can you spot?

http://deepsouthnet.net/tower.html


I was starting to defend this guy a bit. After all, despite the crappy
base, at least it was adequately guyed...... then I took a close look at
his guy supports.... some might thin trees, if at least one isn't a plant!
You were right. Nothing to brag about. I sure wouldn't want to climb
it.


The "deepsouth" part told me just about all I needed to know....
  #4   Report Post  
Old June 28th 05, 03:38 AM
ray13
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Please do tell what are the problems with this install? So I don't make
the same mistakes.

73
KC8OJU

  #5   Report Post  
Old June 28th 05, 04:14 AM
Ken Taylor
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"ray13" wrote in message
oups.com...
Please do tell what are the problems with this install? So I don't make
the same mistakes.

73
KC8OJU


Apart from inadequate guying, the base should be buried well below the
bottom triangular plate. The tower manufacturer spec's would give details.
That tower is going to land on someone's head first storm. Glad it's not my
neighborhood.

Ken
ZL1WKT




  #6   Report Post  
Old June 28th 05, 06:34 AM
JohnM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ken Taylor wrote:
"ray13" wrote in message
oups.com...

Please do tell what are the problems with this install? So I don't make
the same mistakes.

73
KC8OJU



Apart from inadequate guying, the base should be buried well below the
bottom triangular plate. The tower manufacturer spec's would give details.
That tower is going to land on someone's head first storm. Glad it's not my
neighborhood.

Ken
ZL1WKT



He's got pretty high-res pictures, I zoomed one and he's not only got no
thimbles for the guys at the turnbuckles, he's got his clamps on
backwards (the saddles are intended to go against the load-bearing side
of the cable). Pretty simple issues, wonder what the case is for more
involved ones..

John
  #7   Report Post  
Old June 28th 05, 07:38 AM
Rex
 
Posts: n/a
Default

With the very light antenna load I don't see any issues. Certainly if a tree
falls over there might be so would it be so if it was guyed to ground anchor
points and a nearby tree still fell on it. I think you guys are making a
mountain out of a mole hill.


I suppose also if a Boeing 747 crash-landed in this guys yard there would be
an issue as well..but come on guys...this is no big deal so let's be
practical. Frankly I've seen a lot worse and they have been up for years.
And, moreover, if everyone erected strictly according to Rohn standards few
of us could afford a simple 50 footer!


Obviously this Joe S. guy has no life since he has gone out of his way to
start a new thread bashing this fella.
--






"Joe S." wrote in message
...
Take a look at this piece of ****. And the guy who put it up is proud of
it.

How many serious problems can you spot?

http://deepsouthnet.net/tower.html

--

-----




  #8   Report Post  
Old June 28th 05, 08:39 PM
Ed
 
Posts: n/a
Default


With the very light antenna load I don't see any issues. Certainly if
a tree falls over there might be so would it be so if it was guyed to
ground anchor points and a nearby tree still fell on it. I think you
guys are making a mountain out of a mole hill.


I suppose also if a Boeing 747 crash-landed in this guys yard there
would be an issue as well..but come on guys...this is no big deal so
let's be practical. Frankly I've seen a lot worse and they have been
up for years. And, moreover, if everyone erected strictly according to
Rohn standards few of us could afford a simple 50 footer!



You apparently have little understanding of safe tower installation
requirements, regardless of factory specs. This isn't a simple 50 foot
installation... its a 90 foot tower, and when it comes down, its going to
have a big effect on the neighbors. The wind loading of that tower
preempts any problems with antenna loading. Given the poor base, and
especially the lousey guying supports, its an accident waiting to happen.

Ed
  #9   Report Post  
Old June 28th 05, 10:22 PM
Ken Taylor
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ed" wrote in message
. 92.175...

With the very light antenna load I don't see any issues. Certainly if
a tree falls over there might be so would it be so if it was guyed to
ground anchor points and a nearby tree still fell on it. I think you
guys are making a mountain out of a mole hill.


I suppose also if a Boeing 747 crash-landed in this guys yard there
would be an issue as well..but come on guys...this is no big deal so
let's be practical. Frankly I've seen a lot worse and they have been
up for years. And, moreover, if everyone erected strictly according to
Rohn standards few of us could afford a simple 50 footer!



You apparently have little understanding of safe tower installation
requirements, regardless of factory specs. This isn't a simple 50 foot
installation... its a 90 foot tower, and when it comes down, its going to
have a big effect on the neighbors. The wind loading of that tower
preempts any problems with antenna loading. Given the poor base, and
especially the lousey guying supports, its an accident waiting to happen.

Ed


Thanks for saying it. Three four-foot deep lumps of concrete are not a
sufficient anchor for a load like that. I gather there's a bit of wind every
so often in MI? Those feet will pop out like corks.

Here's some guys who thought it through a little better:
http://klickitat.ee.washington.edu/Tower/

This data is for self-supporting towers but it's interesting to note:
http://www.anwireless.com/tower.html#foundation

This is sorta relevant (it's a much bigger tower but is just plain neat:
http://greyfort.com/gallery/album12?page=3)

I mean, sure, we've all put up a dodgy 'tower' (I think my biggest self-made
piece of crap was maybe 8 metres high, and at least I was the only one hurt
during removal!), but this is serious ****, it could easily kill people when
it comes down. When, not if.

Ken
ZL1WKT


  #10   Report Post  
Old June 29th 05, 04:29 AM
Ron
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Ken Taylor wrote:
"Ed" wrote in message
. 92.175...

With the very light antenna load I don't see any issues. Certainly if
a tree falls over there might be so would it be so if it was guyed to
ground anchor points and a nearby tree still fell on it. I think you
guys are making a mountain out of a mole hill.


I suppose also if a Boeing 747 crash-landed in this guys yard there
would be an issue as well..but come on guys...this is no big deal so
let's be practical. Frankly I've seen a lot worse and they have been
up for years. And, moreover, if everyone erected strictly according to
Rohn standards few of us could afford a simple 50 footer!



You apparently have little understanding of safe tower installation
requirements, regardless of factory specs. This isn't a simple 50 foot
installation... its a 90 foot tower, and when it comes down, its going to
have a big effect on the neighbors. The wind loading of that tower
preempts any problems with antenna loading. Given the poor base, and
especially the lousey guying supports, its an accident waiting to happen.

Ed



Thanks for saying it. Three four-foot deep lumps of concrete are not a
sufficient anchor for a load like that. I gather there's a bit of wind every
so often in MI? Those feet will pop out like corks.

Here's some guys who thought it through a little better:
http://klickitat.ee.washington.edu/Tower/

This data is for self-supporting towers but it's interesting to note:
http://www.anwireless.com/tower.html#foundation

This is sorta relevant (it's a much bigger tower but is just plain neat:
http://greyfort.com/gallery/album12?page=3)

I mean, sure, we've all put up a dodgy 'tower' (I think my biggest self-made
piece of crap was maybe 8 metres high, and at least I was the only one hurt
during removal!), but this is serious ****, it could easily kill people when
it comes down. When, not if.

Ken
ZL1WKT


With this being a guyed tower I find it hard to believe that the feet
will come out of the ground or do anything but sink farther into the
ground do to the weight of the tower and the soft soil.

I put up a temporary tower in 1978 that is still standing. It is 50
foot high and is sitting right on the ground (about 8 inches in now). I
have two sets of guy wires. I have 4 ants on it one being a 42 foot 20
Meter KLM. Also one leg is tied to a tree and one tied to an anchor in
the roof of my wife's shop. The third in tied to two posts that are
driven in the ground about 3 foot.

Now remember this was my temporary install of almost 30 years ago.
Someday soon I am expecting to make it more permanent but.......

Ron WA0KDS



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017