Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Hams to the Rescue After Katrina" MSNBC News Article
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 20:36:12 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI"
wrote: No waviering here. The ARS proides usefull service, mostly in keeping H&W stuff off the plate of those with better things to do. It does not properly replace the system used by the cops as witness the keystone cops bummbling we see and here about the ARS is not saving the day or saving civilation, it is hellp people lessen the impact of the disaster, what I have been saying all along As usual our resident dissident has no idea what he is talking about. Here in Alabama we have provided the operators to man the shelters for the Red Cross on the Gulf Coast. They have, and ARE providing the ONLY communications between the shelters and Red Cross HQS in Montgomery. The Alabama Net and other groups are providing links further down the line. Dan/W4NTI He obviously doesn't know much about ARES/RACES. If he did, he would know that Health and Welfare messages have the LOWEST priority after emergency and priority traffic. There has been incident after incident where ARES/RACES was the ONLY communication out of a disaster area. Let alone communication with the Red Cross. The fire at Los Alamos New Mexico is a prime example. When the phones are out, and the public service radios fail, who do they call? ARES/RACES. The military can handle it, but as we have seen it can take days for them to get on site. ARS can get there within a few hours. Dick - W6CCD |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:45:26 -0400, "Jerry"
wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... As someone who lives near Ocala and has to visit a lot of these gated communities run by HOAs, I find most of them to be jerks who are only interested in holding onto their perceived power at any cost. The fact that it hurts others doesn't matter to them. Another HOA in the area told a retired couple move out, or send their 17 year old grand daughter away after she lost both of her parents in an accident. She had a few months till she was to graduate from high school and no other relatives but it didn't matter to the HOA. People like that are scum, no matter how expensive their home, or what they drive. Its just too damn bad you can't tar and feather them and then run them out of town, like the good old days! ;-) -- ? Michael A. Terrell Central Florida I am actually quite peaceable and believe in living and letting live in most cases. Who I allow in my home is up to me and whom I refuse entry is not the purvey of HOA Nazis. And, again, it is why I chose an older home (1956) with plenty of room, almost ZERO crime, and NO HOA's That's why it is important to READ the CC&R's before you move into a housing development with an HOA. If you have read them, and move in anyway, you have no one to complain to except yourself. One good way to temper what you refer to as HOA Nazis is to become a board member yourself and do something about it. Having been an HOA board member, I was disgusted with all the constant complainers at the meetings, but not one of them was willing to lift a finger to help. Some people apparently were just born to complain. HOA's can serve a useful function, unless you are the type that enjoys living on a street with dozens of junk cars that don't run, and weeds 4-feet high. People agree to have HOA's so they can have a reasonably nice area in which to live and raise their children. The protection of property values is a prime consideration. No one forces someone to live in an area with a HOA. From what I have seen, in several cities, most are not as restrictive as those given in these examples. Dick |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On 09/14/05 04:25 pm Dick tossed the following ingredients into the
ever-growing pot of cybersoup: As someone who lives near Ocala and has to visit a lot of these gated communities run by HOAs, I find most of them to be jerks who are only interested in holding onto their perceived power at any cost. The fact that it hurts others doesn't matter to them. Another HOA in the area told a retired couple move out, or send their 17 year old grand daughter away after she lost both of her parents in an accident. She had a few months till she was to graduate from high school and no other relatives but it didn't matter to the HOA. People like that are scum, no matter how expensive their home, or what they drive. Its just too damn bad you can't tar and feather them and then run them out of town, like the good old days! ;-) I am actually quite peaceable and believe in living and letting live in most cases. Who I allow in my home is up to me and whom I refuse entry is not the purvey of HOA Nazis. And, again, it is why I chose an older home (1956) with plenty of room, almost ZERO crime, and NO HOA's That's why it is important to READ the CC&R's before you move into a housing development with an HOA. If you have read them, and move in anyway, you have no one to complain to except yourself. One good way to temper what you refer to as HOA Nazis is to become a board member yourself and do something about it. Having been an HOA board member, I was disgusted with all the constant complainers at the meetings, but not one of them was willing to lift a finger to help. Some people apparently were just born to complain. HOA's can serve a useful function, unless you are the type that enjoys living on a street with dozens of junk cars that don't run, and weeds 4-feet high. People agree to have HOA's so they can have a reasonably nice area in which to live and raise their children. The protection of property values is a prime consideration. No one forces someone to live in an area with a HOA. From what I have seen, in several cities, most are not as restrictive as those given in these examples. It's all very well to tell people not to buy houses with CC&Rs and HOAs, but probably anything recent (last 20 years or so) has them. I've read that the financial institutions that fund the developments insist on them; they may not dictate every detail, but I think there are "model rules" around that the developers copy, and these rules just about require an application in triplicate 3 months in advance before you can get permission to sneeze. Perce |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:43:06 -0400, "Percival P. Cassidy"
wrote: It's all very well to tell people not to buy houses with CC&Rs and HOAs, but probably anything recent (last 20 years or so) has them. I've read that the financial institutions that fund the developments insist on them; they may not dictate every detail, but I think there are "model rules" around that the developers copy, and these rules just about require an application in triplicate 3 months in advance before you can get permission to sneeze. Perce CC&R's are very common today, but HOA's are far less common. Typically, if you buy in a development by one or several builders, the builders will create CC&R's (copied usually as you stated) primarily to protect themselves. They don't want someone trashing the neighborhood while they are attempting to sell new homes. It's still very possible to buy land outside the cities where you can have a custom home built without CC&R's. I have read CC&R's ad nauseam and most of them are very reasonable in their requirements. In our area, they deal primarily with things like property line setbacks, minimum square footage, overall height, height of fences, minimum landscaping, junk cars, etc. All things that most people would like to see some degree of control over to protect the value of their property. If you don't have an HOA, you are forced to sue someone to enforce the CC&R's. Even with an HOA sometimes that becomes necessary, but then the legal fees come out of the funds of the association, and not directly out of your pocket. Dick |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Probably the best test is to determine how much money the HOA is
collecting. If they collect $100 per home for road maintenance, there is little chance that they will accumulate a pot of money to hire lawyers over a small infraction.On the other hand, if the neighborhood is full of lawyers, or is collecting $1200 year per home for "general maintenance" - watch out! I found a neighborhood where the CC&R's essentially had a loophole whereby if you built something that was not approved by the architectural control committee (ACC) , and the ACC did not take action (injunction) for 30 days, it was grandfathered. In other words, get it built fast and keep a low profile for 30 days. Finally, if you buy a 2 acre wooded lot, chances are nobody will see what you are doing and will leave you alone. Dick wrote: On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:43:06 -0400, "Percival P. Cassidy" wrote: It's all very well to tell people not to buy houses with CC&Rs and HOAs, but probably anything recent (last 20 years or so) has them. I've read that the financial institutions that fund the developments insist on them; they may not dictate every detail, but I think there are "model rules" around that the developers copy, and these rules just about require an application in triplicate 3 months in advance before you can get permission to sneeze. Perce CC&R's are very common today, but HOA's are far less common. Typically, if you buy in a development by one or several builders, the builders will create CC&R's (copied usually as you stated) primarily to protect themselves. They don't want someone trashing the neighborhood while they are attempting to sell new homes. It's still very possible to buy land outside the cities where you can have a custom home built without CC&R's. I have read CC&R's ad nauseam and most of them are very reasonable in their requirements. In our area, they deal primarily with things like property line setbacks, minimum square footage, overall height, height of fences, minimum landscaping, junk cars, etc. All things that most people would like to see some degree of control over to protect the value of their property. If you don't have an HOA, you are forced to sue someone to enforce the CC&R's. Even with an HOA sometimes that becomes necessary, but then the legal fees come out of the funds of the association, and not directly out of your pocket. Dick -- Joe Leikhim K4SAT "The RFI-EMI-GUY" The Lost Deep Thoughts By: Jack Handey Before a mad scientist goes mad, there's probably a time when he's only partially mad. And this is the time when he's going to throw his best parties. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:43:06 -0400, "Percival P. Cassidy"
wrote: On 09/14/05 04:25 pm Dick tossed the following ingredients into the ever-growing pot of cybersoup: As someone who lives near Ocala and has to visit a lot of these gated communities run by HOAs, I find most of them to be jerks who are only interested in holding onto their perceived power at any cost. The fact that it hurts others doesn't matter to them. Another HOA in the area told a retired couple move out, or send their 17 year old grand daughter away after she lost both of her parents in an accident. She had a few months till she was to graduate from high school and no other relatives but it didn't matter to the HOA. People like that are scum, no matter how expensive their home, or what they drive. Its just too damn bad you can't tar and feather them and then run them out of town, like the good old days! ;-) I am actually quite peaceable and believe in living and letting live in most cases. Who I allow in my home is up to me and whom I refuse entry is not the purvey of HOA Nazis. And, again, it is why I chose an older home (1956) with plenty of room, almost ZERO crime, and NO HOA's That's why it is important to READ the CC&R's before you move into a housing development with an HOA. If you have read them, and move in anyway, you have no one to complain to except yourself. One good way to temper what you refer to as HOA Nazis is to become a board member yourself and do something about it. Having been an HOA board member, I was disgusted with all the constant complainers at the meetings, but not one of them was willing to lift a finger to help. Some people apparently were just born to complain. HOA's can serve a useful function, unless you are the type that enjoys living on a street with dozens of junk cars that don't run, and weeds 4-feet high. People agree to have HOA's so they can have a reasonably nice area in which to live and raise their children. The protection of property values is a prime consideration. No one forces someone to live in an area with a HOA. From what I have seen, in several cities, most are not as restrictive as those given in these examples. It's all very well to tell people not to buy houses with CC&Rs and HOAs, but probably anything recent (last 20 years or so) has them. I've read that the financial institutions that fund the developments insist on them; they may not dictate every detail, but I think there are "model rules" around that the developers copy, and these rules just about require an application in triplicate 3 months in advance before you can get permission to sneeze. Perce And twelve months advaance notice to stay at home after having a baby. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Dick" LeadWinger wrote in message ... On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:45:26 -0400, "Jerry" wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... As someone who lives near Ocala and has to visit a lot of these gated communities run by HOAs, I find most of them to be jerks who are only interested in holding onto their perceived power at any cost. The fact that it hurts others doesn't matter to them. Another HOA in the area told a retired couple move out, or send their 17 year old grand daughter away after she lost both of her parents in an accident. She had a few months till she was to graduate from high school and no other relatives but it didn't matter to the HOA. People like that are scum, no matter how expensive their home, or what they drive. Its just too damn bad you can't tar and feather them and then run them out of town, like the good old days! ;-) -- ? Michael A. Terrell Central Florida I am actually quite peaceable and believe in living and letting live in most cases. Who I allow in my home is up to me and whom I refuse entry is not the purvey of HOA Nazis. And, again, it is why I chose an older home (1956) with plenty of room, almost ZERO crime, and NO HOA's That's why it is important to READ the CC&R's before you move into a housing development with an HOA. If you have read them, and move in anyway, you have no one to complain to except yourself. One good way to temper what you refer to as HOA Nazis is to become a board member yourself and do something about it. Having been an HOA board member, I was disgusted with all the constant complainers at the meetings, but not one of them was willing to lift a finger to help. Some people apparently were just born to complain. HOA's can serve a useful function, unless you are the type that enjoys living on a street with dozens of junk cars that don't run, and weeds 4-feet high. People agree to have HOA's so they can have a reasonably nice area in which to live and raise their children. The protection of property values is a prime consideration. No one forces someone to live in an area with a HOA. From what I have seen, in several cities, most are not as restrictive as those given in these examples. Dick Oh, I agree totally. It is why I made SURE there were no such things. To my mind, if you do your research carefully BEFORE you buy, it ain't a problem. I simply was not going to HAVE anyone telling me that, if my car broke down and it sat there for awhile, but not "derelict", that I would have to move it. If you pick carefully, the economic factors will keep "riff raff" out of a neighborhood; zoning and general city ordinances will take care of the rest. In my city, if you let your grass grow over a certain height, the city will come and cut it and charge you $100. Few people ever allow that to happen! I simply refuse to knuckle under to ANY HOA or covenant-restricted community, nor will I tolerate some busybody coming on MY land and telling me what color I can paint my door, or how many antennas I can put up. I am a quiet, non-obtrusive man, I keep my yard and house presentable, I mind my own business; you would scarcely know I am there. But nobody is going to regulate what happens on my property beyond reasonable safety and esthetics. I just happen to feel VERY strongly about HOA's. If somebody tried to start an HOA, I would REFUSE to join it (street maintenance is what I pay taxes for!). If they start mouthing off to me about it, then they'd best go home and, well......just be quiet. I'm having NO part of HOA's. 73 Jerry K4KWH |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:25:40 -0700, Dick LeadWinger wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:45:26 -0400, "Jerry" wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... As someone who lives near Ocala and has to visit a lot of these gated communities run by HOAs, I find most of them to be jerks who are only interested in holding onto their perceived power at any cost. The fact that it hurts others doesn't matter to them. Another HOA in the area told a retired couple move out, or send their 17 year old grand daughter away after she lost both of her parents in an accident. She had a few months till she was to graduate from high school and no other relatives but it didn't matter to the HOA. People like that are scum, no matter how expensive their home, or what they drive. Its just too damn bad you can't tar and feather them and then run them out of town, like the good old days! ;-) -- ? Michael A. Terrell Central Florida I am actually quite peaceable and believe in living and letting live in most cases. Who I allow in my home is up to me and whom I refuse entry is not the purvey of HOA Nazis. And, again, it is why I chose an older home (1956) with plenty of room, almost ZERO crime, and NO HOA's That's why it is important to READ the CC&R's before you move into a housing development with an HOA. If you have read them, and move in anyway, you have no one to complain to except yourself. One good way to temper what you refer to as HOA Nazis is to become a board member yourself and do something about it. Not all that easy. My MIL became "treasurer" of her condo association, but the clicque of other jerks did everything they could to keep her away from any past books. She eventually found they were sanctioning members who were a couple of months behind on their dues, while many of the board members were in arrears for as much as 18 months. Having been an HOA board member, I was disgusted with all the constant complainers at the meetings, but not one of them was willing to lift a finger to help. Some people apparently were just born to complain. HOA's can serve a useful function, unless you are the type that enjoys living on a street with dozens of junk cars that don't run, and weeds 4-feet high. People agree to have HOA's so they can have a reasonably nice area in which to live and raise their children. The protection of property values is a prime consideration. No one forces someone to live in an area with a HOA. From what I have seen, in several cities, most are not as restrictive as those given in these examples. Dick |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1419 Â October 22, 2004 | General | |||
ARNewsline 1358 - Aug 22 2003 | Dx | |||
ARNewsline 1358 - Aug 22 2003 | Dx |