"Brenda Ann" wrote:
"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message
oups.com...
I would agree....would you want your cell phone to come with a cord
that you had to plug into a stationary socket before using it?

HDTV will not be a replacement for NTSC until it does everything that
NTSC does now...everything.

And the public will not accept it until it does everything that it
replaces.

NTSC will be with us longer than anyone wants to admit.

I'd like to believe that, but I'm afraid that the FCC has other ideas.

I know I won't be buying an HDTV receiver any time soon, they're still
WAY out of my budget. I can buy a 27" NTSC set that looks just fine for
what's being broadcast for $175, it's 10x to 12x that for the cheapest
HDTV ready (without the HDTV tuner) set. Damn if I'll pay more than a
week's wages for a TV set, there's just nothing worth that kind of
scratch to WATCH on them.


Not a widescreen, but not a bad deal for an entry level set.
No where near $1750-2100 either! Check your facts first.
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/produ...uct_id=2601424

Chip

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

wrote:

"Brenda Ann" wrote:

"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message
groups.com...

I would agree....would you want your cell phone to come with a cord
that you had to plug into a stationary socket before using it?

HDTV will not be a replacement for NTSC until it does everything that
NTSC does now...everything.

And the public will not accept it until it does everything that it
replaces.

NTSC will be with us longer than anyone wants to admit.

I'd like to believe that, but I'm afraid that the FCC has other ideas.

I know I won't be buying an HDTV receiver any time soon, they're still
WAY out of my budget. I can buy a 27" NTSC set that looks just fine for
what's being broadcast for $175, it's 10x to 12x that for the cheapest
HDTV ready (without the HDTV tuner) set. Damn if I'll pay more than a
week's wages for a TV set, there's just nothing worth that kind of
scratch to WATCH on them.



Not a widescreen, but not a bad deal for an entry level set.
No where near $1750-2100 either! Check your facts first.
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/produ...uct_id=2601424

Chip

If it's not widescreen, it's not HDTV.

" wrote:
wrote:

"Brenda Ann" wrote:

"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message
groups.com...

I would agree....would you want your cell phone to come with a cord
that you had to plug into a stationary socket before using it?

HDTV will not be a replacement for NTSC until it does everything that
NTSC does now...everything.

And the public will not accept it until it does everything that it
replaces.

NTSC will be with us longer than anyone wants to admit.

I'd like to believe that, but I'm afraid that the FCC has other ideas.

I know I won't be buying an HDTV receiver any time soon, they're still
WAY out of my budget. I can buy a 27" NTSC set that looks just fine for
what's being broadcast for $175, it's 10x to 12x that for the cheapest
HDTV ready (without the HDTV tuner) set. Damn if I'll pay more than a
week's wages for a TV set, there's just nothing worth that kind of
scratch to WATCH on them.



Not a widescreen, but not a bad deal for an entry level set.
No where near $1750-2100 either! Check your facts first.
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/produ...uct_id=2601424

Chip

If it's not widescreen, it's not HDTV.

Yes, it is HD. If you are watching an HD broadcast, there will be bars on the top and bottom. It cuts down the size of the viewable screen, but it is HD.
The effective screen size would be 29.4" instead of the actual size of 32".
Chip

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

The screen aspect ratio has nothing to do with whether a tv is HDTV or
not.

If the tv can display the lines of resolution at the appropriate scan
rate for HDTV, then it is high definition. Just because it may have
bars on the top and bottom, or on the side when displaying a different
aspect ratio has nothing to do with HDTV or not.

wrote:

The screen aspect ratio has nothing to do with whether a tv is HDTV or
not.

If the tv can display the lines of resolution at the appropriate scan
rate for HDTV, then it is high definition. Just because it may have
bars on the top and bottom, or on the side when displaying a different
aspect ratio has nothing to do with HDTV or not.


I guess if it shows the correct resolution but why anyone would want to
buy something that bass-ackward, I don't know. May as well just buy a
smaller TV with the correct aspect ratio.

" wrote:
wrote:

The screen aspect ratio has nothing to do with whether a tv is HDTV or
not.

If the tv can display the lines of resolution at the appropriate scan
rate for HDTV, then it is high definition. Just because it may have
bars on the top and bottom, or on the side when displaying a different
aspect ratio has nothing to do with HDTV or not.


I guess if it shows the correct resolution but why anyone would want to
buy something that bass-ackward, I don't know. May as well just buy a
smaller TV with the correct aspect ratio.

True, and this is likely a piece of junk tv, but the poster I was responding to said that you couldn't get even an HD monitor for less than $1750.

Chip

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

" wrote:
The screen aspect ratio has nothing to do with whether a tv is HDTV or
not.

If the tv can display the lines of resolution at the appropriate scan
rate for HDTV, then it is high definition. Just because it may have
bars on the top and bottom, or on the side when displaying a different
aspect ratio has nothing to do with HDTV or not.

True, but this is an HD television.

Chip

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

What is the 'correct' aspect ratio then?
Most people for the next 3 or 4 years are going to have 95% or more
stuff available over cable at 4:3 aspect ratio, why would they want to
buy a tv that would have those annoying bars on the sides for 95% of
what they are going to watch for a next few years?

Seems to me that it would be bass-ackwards to buy a tv set that does
not fit most of your available viewing material.

The problem so far in being able to get enough HDTV sets and ATSC
tuners available has been the widespread penetration of cable. To use
the still standard cable, you need a standard tv set. Cable companies
have been slow to provide HDTV capable signal at reasonable cost.

wrote:
The screen aspect ratio has nothing to do with whether a tv is HDTV or
not.

If the tv can display the lines of resolution at the appropriate scan
rate for HDTV, then it is high definition. Just because it may have
bars on the top and bottom, or on the side when displaying a different
aspect ratio has nothing to do with HDTV or not.



I believe the sets he's referring to are called EDTV, they support 480p
which is an improvement over the 480i of NTSC, but nowhere near as nice
as 720p on a HD set.

wrote in message
...
"Brenda Ann" wrote:
"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message
oups.com...
I would agree....would you want your cell phone to come with a cord
that you had to plug into a stationary socket before using it?

HDTV will not be a replacement for NTSC until it does everything that
NTSC does now...everything.

And the public will not accept it until it does everything that it
replaces.

NTSC will be with us longer than anyone wants to admit.

I'd like to believe that, but I'm afraid that the FCC has other ideas.

I know I won't be buying an HDTV receiver any time soon, they're still
WAY out of my budget. I can buy a 27" NTSC set that looks just fine for
what's being broadcast for $175, it's 10x to 12x that for the cheapest
HDTV ready (without the HDTV tuner) set. Damn if I'll pay more than a
week's wages for a TV set, there's just nothing worth that kind of
scratch to WATCH on them.


Not a widescreen, but not a bad deal for an entry level set.
No where near $1750-2100 either! Check your facts first.
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/produ...uct_id=2601424


How nice you can go to Wal-Mart. I can choose from either the BX/PX or
hundreds of stores on the local economy. The BX/PX are by far the cheaper,
and no such sets exist in their local inventory, nor on their website.