| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
March 27th 06, 09:57 PM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner.uk,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
|
|||
|
|||
1000+ Members - Group for Radio Shack DX-394 Users
Never anonymous Bud wrote: On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:29:12 -0600, clifto wrote: Caveat Lector wrote: Just FYI: I see a lot of these mods to increase sensitivity -- resulting in trashing the dynamic range Remember some of these mods are made by amateurs The factory engineers designed the sensitivity for very good reasons Problem is, many times those reasons have more to do with cost than with performance. My question would be... WHAT does this have to do with scanning, and WHY was it cross-posted to 6 newsgroups?? Because the original poster is a Canuck, and doesn't know any better? Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk. This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity... Remove XYZ to email me |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1418  October 15, 2004 | Dx | |||
| News group or mailing list for EchoLink users | Digital | |||
| News group or mailing list for EchoLink users | Digital | |||
| SX-88 USERS GROUP? | Boatanchors | |||
| SX-88 USERS GROUP? | Boatanchors | |||
Linear Mode
