|
cease and desist - Mark, Just ignore them.
"an_old_friend" wrote in news:1155686981.395899.190510
@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com: wrote: cease and desist Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
cease and desist - Mark, Just ignore them.
"an_old_friend" wrote in news:1155687253.119045.45410
@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: wrote: cease and desist Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
cease and desist - Mark, Just ignore them.
"an_old_friend" wrote in
oups.com: Woger wrote: wrote in message ups.com... an_old_fraud wrote: cease and desist Go suck your daddy's cock, Markie. Or is that what your shemale wife is doing while you are online? + Wow, Not Roger. You certainly are without peers when it comes to responses. indeed it is amazing the way he comes up with them Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
Cease and desist breathing, Markie - Mark, Just ignore them.
"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in
oups.com: Lisping cocksucker Davey wanting to suck Roger's Woger wrote: wrote in message ups.com... an_old_fraud wrote: cease and desist Go suck your daddy's cock, Markie. Or is that what your shemale wife is doing while you are online? + Wow, Not Roger. You certainly are without peers when it comes to responses. Wow, Dave, it sure beat your limpdicked one. Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
Cease and desist breathing, Marqueer! - Mark, Just ignore them.
"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in
ups.com: an_old_fraud wrote: indeed it is amazing the way he comes up with them However it's not surprizing you can't come up with anything good, Marqueer. Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
On 15 Aug 2006 17:08:18 -0700, Secwet Woger wrote:
: : As usual, Saggytits cut and pastes from another website and adds a few : of his own words so it appears he knows what the **** he is talking : aboiut. If you know what you are talking "aboiut," you should be able to prove what you just said. But, of course, you can't. : This calculation ignores line losses and final amplifier inefficiencies, : but there's no way in Glendale you can convince me that you can take a : 100 watt transmitter and manage to lose so much power that you have : seven milliwatts or less being radiated. : : BWHAHAHAHA Says the know-nothing moron who claimed an Alabama ARES : website was the one for Wiseman's West Virginia local ARES. Grasp onto that desperately, Woger, as you try to change the subject yet another time. Say: While we're on the subject of ARES, did you go to the last meeting as Dave Heil requested? I'll bet you didn't, even though you would have been invited to give another talk on negative SWR. There's always the next time, Woger. You can give a talk on r.m.s. voltage instead. ==================== In message XLSKB3LR38448.4326273148@anonymous, Secwet Woger dazzled his readers with his logic skills by saying: "The fact is you still can't disprove I've never been to your workplace." ==================== In message , Secwet Woger bragged about his Extra Class examination fame with the claim: "If poor chronic alcoholic and drug abuser Gopher face wouldn't drink so much because he is womanless, he could spell 'retested', 'dumb' and 'Rogie' and could actually pass an Extra license exam." ==================== In message .com, Secwet Woger incorrectly corrected someone else with "Too bad you can't even spell non sequitor correctly, though." ==================== "Yes, one can always tell a cowardly CHICKEN**** when he hides behind anonymity." -- KC8JBO in message ==================== "Roger's background does have International affairs in it. Too bad." -- International man of mystery, Secwet Woger, in message .com "aboiut". Well, it's about "tiome". "equivilent" Equi.what? "Jealoius". Jelly? What? "Sodmy". "C'mon over and you can sodmy yard". Dave Heil. "Somebosy". Tech school talk? "proive" The proife is in the pudding? "moutgh" Rog has a moutgh full. "spens". Do you spend it or spin it? "Certailny: Woger is certailny stupid. "Iliterate" What's an L here and there? "entiorely" West Virginia phonics again. "apoloigize" Only in Woger's warped mind. "wiuth" Wiuth what?? "exaggerarte" Good one. "eteranl" As in forever? "ionly" Ions? Lonely? Who knows? "expossed" Still no spell check. "workibg" As in working? "assulted" Darned typos! "Georgaphy." Georgia on his mind? "remibndded" It is hard to talk with your mouth full. "corrpuption" Is that a dog? "molsetred" Only 2Test knows. "Whinyng". What? "Plagairizing". Geesh "emnpty" The inside of Roger's head. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Stagger Lee wrote:
[snip] 2. The power density is related to the electric field and the impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi). [snip] Thanks for the reminder on the calculations. Funny but a couple of my younger colleagues who think themselves quite the electronics men still do not think 'space' has an impedance. There is nothing there, after all.. That is what too much PCB layout/CAD work wioll do to one. hehe PJ |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Stagger Lee wrote: On 15 Aug 2006 19:40:07 -0700, N9OGL wrote: The power in wattage and the electrical field are not related because a power output in wattage can produce different fields depending on lengh of coax, antenna, antenna height...and your friends in the Office of You can't get around physics, Todd. The power density is directly related to the electric field through an Ohm's law type of relationship, expressed as the square of the r.m.s value of e, divided by the impedance of free space. Once you know the power density, it is a matter of summing that power density over the radiation pattern of the antenna to figure out the total radiated power. Therefore, there *is* a relationship between radiated power and field strength. In the case of an isotropic radiator, the relationship between radiated power and field strength is easy to calculate, and it provides one with a limiting case which can act as a guideline. engineering and technology at the FCC will tell you that. The antenna I'm using is a very imefficient antenna, in fact the signal is acually I'm not interested in your rationalizations, Todd, because I'm not the one who is at risk. In this real world, your power output is about five orders of magnitude larger than the power theoretically needed to produce the maximum allowed electric field. To me, that would be a cause for great concern. If you want to risk an FCC enforcement action against you, be my guest. ==================== God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and then there was light. I would really suggest you read the FCC Office of Engineering and technology bulletin on PART 15, it OET Bulletin 63 http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineeri...3/oet63rev.pdf expecially page 29 which states: What is the relationship between "microvolts per meter" and Watts? Watts are the units used to describe the amount of power generated by a transmitter. Microvolts per meter (µV/m) are the units used to describe the strength of an electric field created by the operation of a transmitter. A particular transmitter that generates a constant level of power (Watts) can produce electric fields of different strengths (µV/m) depending on, among other things, the type of transmission line and antenna connected to it. Because it is the electric field that causes interference to authorized radio communications, and since a particular electric field strength does not directly correspond to a particular level of transmitter power, most of the Part 15 emission limits are specified in field strength. So logically if you use a ineffecient antenna and ****ty coax then you can create a low enough field....I'm tell you right now, I Have a field strength meter that reads microvolts, and I check the field ever morning, at it's not at no 30 meters either, it's around 17.5 meters and the electrical field is 1,0000 uV ...So believe what the hell you want I check it every morning and it's 1,000 uV @17.5 meters and at 30 meters it's 0. I would also point out I come from a long line of electricians (my father, my grandfather and my great grandfather) and THEY will back me up. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
In article ,
patrick jankowiak wrote: Stagger Lee wrote: [snip] 2. The power density is related to the electric field and the impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi). [snip] Thanks for the reminder on the calculations. Funny but a couple of my younger colleagues who think themselves quite the electronics men still do not think 'space' has an impedance. There is nothing there, after all.. That is what too much PCB layout/CAD work wioll do to one. hehe No this is what our educational system does to EE's. PCB layout and CAD work will bring them back to reality. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com