N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
 

Lisping Lloyd Davies who desperately wants to suck Roger's Woger wrote:
IKYABWAI

Yet you wrote:


"breaddead" - LLoyd hasn't got anything upstairs in the oven
"defenseive" - Lardass is "defensive" of his ignorance
"counter-offenseive" - When LARDASS LLoyds attack
"nights" - Athens ASSHOLE was referring to last "night's" masturbation
session
"I forget to set the playlist in Winamp to repeat!" - Mongolloyd also
"forgets" the use of past tense, maybe he forgot!
"Techincal" - Lloyd just hates those "technical" things
"Dalkes" - Lloyd's granddad remembers when movies became "talkies" too
bad LARDASS learned to Dalk sic
"That it!" - When Mongolloyds get real mad, they talk like Tor Johnson
"Woger" - LARDASS closely identifies with Elmer Fudd with his lack of
hair and all
"decide on weather or not" - It's always "stormy weather" with Lloyd
deciding "whether" or not to use correct English
"can not" - Mongolloyd is wondering how he "cannot" seem to get ahead
in life
"is'nt" - "Isn't" LARDASS cute when he is mad?
"PAINFULL" - How LARDASS' bathroom scale feels when he steps on it in
the morning, real "painful"
"I wish for Roger Wisemand" - Lloyd liked thosed thingd ford Rogerd
"alot" - Davies dreams he can communicate in English a lot
"thier" - Lavender Lloyd sure does lisp after a night behind the
dumpster
"dont" - Lloyd says "dont", the rest of the world says "don't"
"Isreal" - Is FATASS Lloyd's retardation for real, or can he blame
Israel?
"juist jelous" "extermenate" - A three for one post Athens Asshole
axiom
"footting" - What LARDASS doesn't have, an equal "footing" anywhere
"Cant" - Emmanuel?
"th" - When Lloyd gets nervous, he stutte, er stutters
"enfighting" - Lloyd's two brain cells are infighting for control of
his stupidity
"YOU STUPID JEW!" - Wasn't Jesus Jewish, so called Christian LLoyd?
"Tonite" - There's nothing in Lloyd's brain "tonight" or any night
"segmant" - What Lloyd's communications are, only sentence "segments"
"I just listening" - Too bad he doesn't listen to his poor English
"buffon" - The Athens, Alabama "buffoon" strikes again!
"museium" - Where LARDASS LLoyd keeps his "muse"
"nastey" - How everybody describes LARDASS' body stench, especially in
the ghetto
"loose" - Lloyd's description of his spinchter muscles...
"wont" - Lloyd refuses to learn English, it's Lloyd's "wont"
"awhile" - It will be "a while" before Davies gets a clue
"freinds" - Lloyd's conglomeration of "friends" and "fiends"
"thier" - "There" just isn't any hope for LARDASS Lloyd "ill-educated"
Davies
"backstabers" - Lloyd's version of the OJays' hit
"becuase" - Home of the "Deliverance Extras" spelling by LARDASS Lloyd
"obselete" - What LARDASS thinking is to him, others see it as
'obsolete'.....
"belive" - What fools like LARDASS Lloyd "believes"
"thier" - Ill-educated Xtian LARDASS Lloyd shows off his language
skills!
"marshalls" - Mongolloyd spell "marshals" real good!
Wisemand - LARDASSd ****sd upd againd
"compay" - Mongolloyd never gets any female "compay," while others do
get "company"
" But when we are winning," DUMB****, YOU have NEVER WON anything in
your miserable life!
"and do the nasty!" You don't really know what that means, do you, 30
year old VIRGIN?
"It's does" - Mongolloyd use good English
"momnet" - LARDASS Lloyd Davies misses his dead "momnet" for a "moment"
"seriuosly" - Lavender Lad President Mongolloyd wants to be taken
"seriously" instead of "seriuosly"
"annouced" - Mongolloyd "announces" his stupidity again
"tonite" - Davies never lets his lack of education stop him from
announcing to the world he's a ****ing imbecile!
"nite" - When LARDASS Lloyd molests those kids he makes them say "nite,
nite" at "night"
"weldare" - Calling Dr. Weldare, LARDASS needs his head out of his
FATASS....put it on his welfare bill
"so **** of" - When Mongolloyds who have man tits talk tough......
"fukcing funney" - Alabama deliverance extra Davies speak
"pictrue" - "Picture" yourself as a Davies Mongolloyd
"isseus" - Davies has "issues" too many to list here
"resortjng" - Is Lloyd from Finland?
"attsxks" - When LARDASS Davies "attacks" he uses illiteracy
"basturds"- What mental illness patient LARDASS Lloyd calls his nurses
"shkt" - Mongolloyd Davies' "Skittles", he likes that "Hershey rainbow"
"law suit" - LARDASS never leaves his HUD apartment with out his law
suit
"opinionn" - When LARDASSn postsn whiln drunkn
"intrenet harrasssmint" - Tries to make LARDASS Lloyd's rotting teeth
feel fresh
"sneeky" - The teachers always "sneaked" Lloyd through the next grade
"that' wasnet" - LLoyd was out that year of school that they went over
English grammar
idiout! - "Lloyid" sic strikes out again!
"speling" - Mongolloyd Davies the "spelling" bee champ of the retards!
"reas isseus instaed" - Davies talking out of that cheap beer again
"atttacking" - LARDASS Lloyd stutters when he gets upset.....ttttt.....
"challegne" - When Mongolloyds drink and post
"metnal" - Mongolloyd just doesn't have the "mental" ability to
debate......
"debste" - What Lloyd's mommy did to him in the bathtub
"cahllenge" - Mongolloyd speak for "call" and "challenge"
"basturds" - LLoyd ,Amanda's illegitimate "*******" sure does have a
scat fetish
"morsd" - Whend Daviesd drinkd andd postd
"wont" - It is Mongolloyd's "wont" to be stupid, "won't " you let him?
"youd" - Oops, LARDASS did it again!
"poinion" - Must be an Athens Alabama "Deliverance" thing
"Woger Wiseman"- LARDASS Lloyd's got that cocksucker's lisp
"isnt" - "Isn't" LARDASS cute when he slobbers?
"worfh" - Davies' cocksucking lisp has returned
"waset of spaceda" - When Lloyd's only friend Colt 45 malt liquor kicks
in
"Oppulant" - The only thing "opulent" in LARDASS is that he is rich in
ignorance

N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
 

patrick jankowiak wrote:
Stagger Lee wrote:

[snip]
2. The power density is related to the electric field and the
impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi).

[snip]

Thanks for the reminder on the calculations. Funny but a couple of my
younger colleagues who think themselves quite the electronics men
still do not think 'space' has an impedance. There is nothing there,
after all.. That is what too much PCB layout/CAD work wioll do to one.
hehe

Too Bad Saggytits had to cut and paste the "calculations", he didn't
know them himself. The only space Saggytits knows about is the one
between his dumbo ears.

N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
 

"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in message
ups.com...

patrick jankowiak wrote:
Stagger Lee wrote:

[snip]
2. The power density is related to the electric field and the
impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi).

[snip]

Thanks for the reminder on the calculations. Funny but a couple of my
younger colleagues who think themselves quite the electronics men
still do not think 'space' has an impedance. There is nothing there,
after all.. That is what too much PCB layout/CAD work wioll do to one.
hehe

Too Bad Saggytits had to cut and paste the "calculations", he didn't
know them himself. The only space Saggytits knows about is the one
between his dumbo ears.



That is why we always register for Pwofessow Woger's classes on
negative VSWR and especially his classes on RMS voltage.
Pwofessow Woger has perfect attendance at ARES meetings in
his area.

Herb

N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
 

Herb wrote:
"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in message
ups.com...

patrick jankowiak wrote:
Stagger Lee wrote:

[snip]
2. The power density is related to the electric field and the
impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi).

[snip]

Thanks for the reminder on the calculations. Funny but a couple of my
younger colleagues who think themselves quite the electronics men
still do not think 'space' has an impedance. There is nothing there,
after all.. That is what too much PCB layout/CAD work wioll do to one.
hehe

Too Bad Saggytits had to cut and paste the "calculations", he didn't
know them himself. The only space Saggytits knows about is the one
between his dumbo ears.



That is why we always register for Pwofessow Woger's classes on
negative VSWR and especially his classes on RMS voltage.

Yet he didn't have to cut and paste from another website and add a few
comments so it looks like he wrote the whole thing like you did. Tell
us again how Eric Clapton wrote "Layla" for your ex streetwalker wife
instead of George Harrison's wife, stupid.

Pwofessow Woger has perfect attendance at ARES meetings in
his area.

So do you hiding behind your hideous ex streetwalker wife, lisping
Davey.

N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
 

On 16 Aug 2006 19:40:03 -0700, N9OGL wrote:
:
: I would really suggest you read the FCC Office of Engineering and
: technology bulletin on PART 15, it OET Bulletin 63
: http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineeri...3/oet63rev.pdf
: expecially page 29 which states:
:
:
: What is the relationship between "microvolts per meter" and Watts?
:
: Watts are the units used to describe the amount of power generated by a
: transmitter. Microvolts per meter (µV/m) are the units used to
: describe the strength of an electric field created by the operation of
: a transmitter. A particular transmitter that generates a constant level
: of power (Watts) can produce electric fields of different strengths
: (µV/m) depending on, among other things, the type of transmission line
: and antenna
[snip]

Todd, there isn't a law you can quote which governs physics. You
can't repeal the law of gravity, and you can't logically state that
transmitter power and electric field strength are independent of one
another. Think about it: That idea doesn't even make sense.

: So logically if you use a ineffecient antenna and ****ty coax then you
: can create a low enough field....I'm tell you right now, I Have a field
: strength meter that reads microvolts, and I check the field ever
: morning, at it's not at no 30 meters either, it's around 17.5 meters

Do you know the difference between the far and near fields? Are you
aware that an ordinary field strength meter can give you wildly
incorrect results when it is placed in the near field of an antenna?
Most engineers would tell you that you have to be at least five
wavelengths away from the antenna (and preferably ten) before you are
out of the influence of the near field. At 33 MHz, the wavelength is
roughly nine meters; therefore, your meter is in the near field of the
antenna, and all bets are off.

: and the electrical field is 1,0000 uV ...So believe what the hell you
: want I check it every morning and it's 1,000 uV @17.5 meters and at 30
: meters it's 0. I would also point out I come from a long line of
: electricians (my father, my grandfather and my great grandfather) and
: THEY will back me up.

Sigh. That's what we need: Electricians who never even heard of free
space impedance.



====================
God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t,"
and then there was light.

Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV
 

Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV

10. Someone asks, "What died in here?" and you show them

9. Dust on TV screen gives everybody comical Andy Rooney eyebrows

8. When the FCC mobile lab pulls up in front of your house, Riley
Hollingsworth refuses to get out of the van

7. The so-called "Dust Bunnies" have sharp, snapping teeth

6. Your house gets hit by a twister and it actually looks better

5. Guests take one look at your bathroom and decide to use the backyard

4. When someone from the health department rings your doorbell, you
say, "Not again!"

3. Every time you turn on a faucet, you hear a muffled barking sound

2. Even Mark Morgan refuses to sleep on your floor

1. You've been receiving death threats from Mr. Clean

Cease desist and grow up
 

wrote:

Cease desist and grow up

N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
 

Stagger Lee wrote:
On 15 Aug 2006 19:40:07 -0700, N9OGL wrote:

The power in wattage and the electrical field are not related because a
power output in wattage can produce different fields depending on lengh
of coax, antenna, antenna height...and your friends in the Office of

You can't get around physics, Todd. The power density is directly
related to the electric field through an Ohm's law type of relationship,
expressed as the square of the r.m.s value of e, divided by the
impedance of free space. Once you know the power density, it is a
matter of summing that power density over the radiation pattern of the
antenna to figure out the total radiated power. Therefore, there *is* a
relationship between radiated power and field strength. In the case of
an isotropic radiator, the relationship between radiated power and field
strength is easy to calculate, and it provides one with a limiting case
which can act as a guideline.


I know it, you know it...tell it to the FCC beacuse THEIR the ones
saying there isn't . I would right now like to point out that I'm NOT
using a Isotropic radiator.

engineering and technology at the FCC will tell you that. The antenna
I'm using is a very imefficient antenna, in fact the signal is acually

I'm not interested in your rationalizations, Todd, because I'm not the
one who is at risk. In this real world, your power output is about
five orders of magnitude larger than the power theoretically needed to
produce the maximum allowed electric field. To me, that would be a
cause for great concern.

If you want to risk an FCC enforcement action against you, be my guest.


Again it's NOT my rational it's the FCC's but like I told Stebie the
HAM and Internet COP if you have a problem with it, go bitch to The FCC
and I'll throw their little bulletin both in theirs and the judges
face, along with a few other things.. including how much of sick joke
their licensing and waiver system is!!

Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13556.00 MHz LSB



====================
God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t,"
and then there was light.

N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
 

N9OGL wrote:
Stagger Lee wrote:
On 15 Aug 2006 19:40:07 -0700, N9OGL wrote:

The power in wattage and the electrical field are not related because a
power output in wattage can produce different fields depending on lengh
of coax, antenna, antenna height...and your friends in the Office of

You can't get around physics, Todd. The power density is directly
related to the electric field through an Ohm's law type of relationship,
expressed as the square of the r.m.s value of e, divided by the
impedance of free space. Once you know the power density, it is a
matter of summing that power density over the radiation pattern of the
antenna to figure out the total radiated power. Therefore, there *is* a
relationship between radiated power and field strength. In the case of
an isotropic radiator, the relationship between radiated power and field
strength is easy to calculate, and it provides one with a limiting case
which can act as a guideline.


I know it, you know it...tell it to the FCC beacuse THEIR the ones
saying there isn't . I would right now like to point out that I'm NOT
using a Isotropic radiator.

engineering and technology at the FCC will tell you that. The antenna
I'm using is a very imefficient antenna, in fact the signal is acually

I'm not interested in your rationalizations, Todd, because I'm not the
one who is at risk. In this real world, your power output is about
five orders of magnitude larger than the power theoretically needed to
produce the maximum allowed electric field. To me, that would be a
cause for great concern.

If you want to risk an FCC enforcement action against you, be my guest.


Again it's NOT my rational it's the FCC's but like I told Stebie the
HAM and Internet COP if you have a problem with it, go bitch to The FCC
and I'll throw their little bulletin both in theirs and the judges
face, along with a few other things.. including how much of sick joke
their licensing and waiver system is!!
sorry Tood there you are worng you will not throw the bullitin in
anyone face

why? because NObody will show up to get hit with it

The FCC for it faults knows Know that a lot of are full of it

Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13556.00 MHz LSB



====================
God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t,"
and then there was light.

N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
 

an old friend wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
Stagger Lee wrote:
On 15 Aug 2006 19:40:07 -0700, N9OGL wrote:

The power in wattage and the electrical field are not related because a
power output in wattage can produce different fields depending on lengh
of coax, antenna, antenna height...and your friends in the Office of

You can't get around physics, Todd. The power density is directly
related to the electric field through an Ohm's law type of relationship,
expressed as the square of the r.m.s value of e, divided by the
impedance of free space. Once you know the power density, it is a
matter of summing that power density over the radiation pattern of the
antenna to figure out the total radiated power. Therefore, there *is* a
relationship between radiated power and field strength. In the case of
an isotropic radiator, the relationship between radiated power and field
strength is easy to calculate, and it provides one with a limiting case
which can act as a guideline.


I know it, you know it...tell it to the FCC beacuse THEIR the ones
saying there isn't . I would right now like to point out that I'm NOT
using a Isotropic radiator.

engineering and technology at the FCC will tell you that. The antenna
I'm using is a very imefficient antenna, in fact the signal is acually

I'm not interested in your rationalizations, Todd, because I'm not the
one who is at risk. In this real world, your power output is about
five orders of magnitude larger than the power theoretically needed to
produce the maximum allowed electric field. To me, that would be a
cause for great concern.

If you want to risk an FCC enforcement action against you, be my guest.


Again it's NOT my rational it's the FCC's but like I told Stebie the
HAM and Internet COP if you have a problem with it, go bitch to The FCC
and I'll throw their little bulletin both in theirs and the judges
face, along with a few other things.. including how much of sick joke
their licensing and waiver system is!!
sorry Tood there you are worng you will not throw the bullitin in
anyone face

why? because NObody will show up to get hit with it

The FCC for it faults knows Know that a lot of are full of it

Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13556.00 MHz LSB



That's how they have lied all these years about the waivering process,
they go to the courts saying one thing, then turn around and do
another. Same thing here, they publish bulletins saying one thing and
then go after people who's following the same rules, claiming something
different.

If they want to complain about the station they can file the complaint
here

http://www.fcc.gov/eb/sed/ulo.html
Complaints

Written complaints alleging violations of Section 301 of the
Communications Act should be sent to the Federal Communications
Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Spectrum Enforcement Division, 445 12th
Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. Complaints should include the name of
the operator, if known, how the station identifies itself, the location
of the station, the operating frequency, the type of station being
operated, and whether the station's operation is causing interference.

For complaints involving unlicensed amateur radio operations, please
click here.

For complaints involving unlicensed broadcast station operations,
please click here.


But I will fight it ever step of the way, I would like them (the FCC)
to explain to the judge why they didn't consider my Seven (7) broadcast
applications and Waivers?? So all I ahve to tell stebie and his butt
buddies go for it!!!