Home Menu

Menu


RadioBanter » rec.radio.amateur » General > ARS License Numbers
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 4th 06, 03:27 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default ARS License Numbers
wrote in
oups.com:

These are the numbers of current, unexpired
amateur radio licenses held by individuals
on the stated dates, and the percentage of
the total number of active licenses that
class contains:

As of May 14, 2000:

Novice - 49,329 (7.3%)
Technician - 205,394 (30.4%)
Technician Plus - 128,860 (19.1%)
General - 112,677 (16.7%)
Advanced - 99,782 (14.8%)
Extra - 78,750 (11.7%)

Total Tech/TechPlus - 334,254 (49.5%)

Total General/Advanced/Extra - 291,209 (43.2%)

Total all classes - 674,792


As of September 1, 2006:

Novice - 24,494 (3.7%) [decrease of 24,835]
Technician - 284,694 (43.3%) [increase of 79,300]
Technician Plus - 36,183 (5.5%) [decrease of 92,677]
General - 132,213 (20.1%) [increase of 19,536]
Advanced - 71,045 (10.8%) [decrease of 28,737]
Extra - 108,307 (16.5%) [increase of 29,557]

(percentages may not add up to exactly 100.0% due to rounding)

Total Tech/TechPlus - 320,877 (48.8%) [decrease of 13,377]

Total General/Advanced/Extra - 311,565 (47.4%) [increase of 20,356]

Total all classes - 656,936 (decrease of 17,856)

Note that these totals do not include licenses
that have expired but are in the grace period.

They also do not include club, military, RACES
or other station-only licenses.

Note also that effective April 15, 2000, new
Novice, Technician Plus and Advanced licenses
are no longer issued.

Since April 15, 2000, FCC has renewed all existing
Technician Plus licenses as Technician. It is therefore
informative to consider the totals of the two classes,
since the Technician class includes a significant
number of Technician Plus licenses renewed as
Technician.

73 de Jim, N2EY


Thanks Jim.

Maybe now everyone will see that dumbing things down was bad for ham
radio.

73

SC
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 4th 06, 03:49 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,590
Default ARS License Numbers

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
Thanks Jim.

Maybe now everyone will see that dumbing things down was bad for ham
radio.
wht dumbing down has occured since Ham radio was dumbed down with
higher code test speeds?

73

SC

Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #3   Report Post  
Old September 4th 06, 05:33 PM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,590
Default ARS License Numbers

wrote:

trolling right along

Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #4   Report Post  
Old September 5th 06, 12:15 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default ARS License Numbers
"an old friend" wrote in
oups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
Thanks Jim.

Maybe now everyone will see that dumbing things down was bad for ham
radio.
wht dumbing down has occured since Ham radio was dumbed down with
higher code test speeds?


You're living proof CW was a good filter for lazy lids. It didn't keep all
the lids out, but it did keep stupid ones out until they come up with the
no code tech license.

Sc
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #5   Report Post  
Old September 5th 06, 12:45 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,590
Default slow code:kook on parade
Slow Code wrote:
"an old friend" wrote in
oups.com:

wht dumbing down has occured since Ham radio was dumbed down with
higher code test speeds?


You're living proof CW was a good filter for lazy lids.
nope
It didn't keep all
the lids out, but it did keep stupid ones out until they come up with the
no code tech license.
nope witness wisemn and yourself

slow code:kook on parade

Sc

Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #6   Report Post  
Old September 6th 06, 05:15 PM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 591
Default Woger:kook on parade

wrote:

Woger:kook on parade

Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #7   Report Post  
Old September 6th 06, 05:19 PM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 591
Default woger: lying kook on parade http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/mipsor/default.htm

wrote:
 wrote:
On 5 Sep 2006 06:11:03 -0700, wrote:



Woger you are an FCC certified bad operator

He is? Where?
FCC NAl certify your bad operating
You are a State of Michigan (and other states) registered
child molester.

http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/mipsor/default.htm
funny how the state disagress

Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #8   Report Post  
Old September 7th 06, 03:56 PM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 124
Default woger: lying kook on parade http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm

wrote:
You are a State of Michigan (and other states) registered
child molester.

http

Funny how you make a fake website.

woger: lying kook on parade
http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm
running from the truth as alaways

Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #9   Report Post  
Old September 7th 06, 03:56 PM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.scanner
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 124
Default woger: lying kook on parade http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm

wrote:
You are a State of Michigan (and other states) registered
child molester.

http

Funny how you make a fake website.

woger: lying kook on parade
http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm
running from the truth as alaways

Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #10   Report Post  
Old September 8th 06, 06:48 PM posted to alt.radio.scanner.flame_fest,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.usenet.kooks
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 152
Default woger try http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm

wrote:

woger try http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm
where the state of Michigan makes clear I am not

Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARS License Numbers Slow Code Antenna 1 August 4th 06 02:33 AM
ARS License Numbers Slow Code Scanner 1 August 4th 06 02:33 AM
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? Bill Sohl Policy 254 December 31st 05 03:50 AM
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access Lloyd Mitchell Antenna 43 October 26th 04 01:37 AM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules JJ General 159 August 12th 03 12:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Contact Us RadioBanter forum home Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017