![]() |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
N9OGL wrote: You have no proof of that, your just assuming and that don't mean ****, the fact is Part 15 has over the years beocme very relaxed instead of be restricted and if I am breaking the rules they aren't going to change the rules because of one person broke the rules...only a CB operator would think that...No what I think it is, is your one of those little pussy beacon operators on that frequency and your ****ed off because some one broadcasting on that frequency instead of running a little pussy beacon.....oh well... Hey, Toad, exactly what is a "pussy beacon?" When I was a teenager, a "pussy beacon" was a metalflake blue Corvette with side pipes. Worked really well, too. Dance, Toad, DANCE! |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
Brenda Ann wrote: What's irritating is that when the FCC takes you down they'll probably rewrite Part 15 to be even more restrictive than it is. In that case, NOBODY wins. You have no proof of that, your just assuming and that don't mean ****, the fact is Part 15 has over the years beocme very relaxed instead of be restricted That's for sure.. look at what they have done to Part 15 to allow for BPL... that's worse than any 50 pirates. No argument. But remember: the BPL crowd has the Electronic Industries Association and quite a few cubic yards of money behind it. Part 15 experimenters don't have nearly that kind of clout. With the FCC, money talks and BS walks. They could very easily rewrite Part 15 to prohibit any kind of experimentation not specifically authorized by the FCC, meaning, pay big bucks for a special authorization. It's the little guys like us who will take it in the shorts like always. |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: What's irritating is that when the FCC takes you down they'll probably rewrite Part 15 to be even more restrictive than it is. In that case, NOBODY wins. You have no proof of that, your just assuming and that don't mean ****, the fact is Part 15 has over the years beocme very relaxed instead of be restricted That's for sure.. look at what they have done to Part 15 to allow for BPL... that's worse than any 50 pirates. No argument. But remember: the BPL crowd has the Electronic Industries Association and quite a few cubic yards of money behind it. Part 15 experimenters don't have nearly that kind of clout. With the FCC, money talks and BS walks. They could very easily rewrite Part 15 to prohibit any kind of experimentation not specifically authorized by the FCC, meaning, pay big bucks for a special authorization. It's the little guys like us who will take it in the shorts like always. No that's what they have Part 5 for. Part 5 is a experimental license for experimenting. read the rules. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/w...7cfrv1_05.html BTW an Experimental License isn't that much, I believe it's around $55 dollars, hell anyone can afford that! Part 15 wasn't really in reality designed for experimenting or broadcasting it was designed to regulated unwanted fields. Here's some interesting read ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Mass_M...tion/74-87.pdf Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
N9OGL wrote: Part 15 wasn't really in reality designed for experimenting or broadcasting it was designed to regulated unwanted fields. Unwanted fields? Sounds like they had Omega One in mind when they wrote the regulations. |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
N9OGL wrote: Hey, Toad, exactly what is a "pussy beacon?" It's a low power beacon, operated by a moron who don't have the balls to run a real station. BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Yeah, you have to be a real man to flagrantly violate the rules and brag about it on the Internet. In the real world that's called "stupidity." |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
N9OGL wrote: No that's what they have Part 5 for. Part 5 is a experimental license for experimenting. read the rules. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/w...7cfrv1_05.html BTW an Experimental License isn't that much, I believe it's around $55 dollars, hell anyone can afford that! Part 15 wasn't really in reality designed for experimenting or broadcasting it was designed to regulated unwanted fields. You didn't get the point (but, then, you rarely do). What I meant was that they could easily rewrite Part 15 or any other rule to restrict experimenting even further. We don't want that. You bring up a good question, though. If it's so cheap and easy to get an experimental license, why didn't you get one for your operation on 13.556 MHz? Then this entire discussion would be moot. |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
wrote: N9OGL wrote: No that's what they have Part 5 for. Part 5 is a experimental license for experimenting. read the rules. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/w...7cfrv1_05.html BTW an Experimental License isn't that much, I believe it's around $55 dollars, hell anyone can afford that! Part 15 wasn't really in reality designed for experimenting or broadcasting it was designed to regulated unwanted fields. You didn't get the point (but, then, you rarely do). What I meant was that they could easily rewrite Part 15 or any other rule to restrict experimenting even further. We don't want that. no dumbass YOU don't get the point Part 15 wasn't designed for experimenting, it was designed for unwanted field emissions like what a computer radiates off, or off type accepted transmitter. Cordless phones and BPL are two other thing govern by Part 15 but if you read ALL of part 15 that is what part 15 is for. If you want to experiment get an experimental license. Don't come on here and claim "oh, he's breaking the law, now the FCC is going to tighten the rules governing part 15, in reality they are NOT going to change the rules because one person breaks the rules.You seem to lack understanding on that and I'm not going to debate it with someone who has no understanding of it. Because I'll tell you what a number of people has broken Part 15 over the years and has been busted by the FCC (see Dugan V FCC, Dugan was running a pirate radio station on the FM broadcast band and was busted by the FCC who claimed he was in violation of Part 15, the US Court of Appeal up held it) Did the FCC change the rule after Dugan or any other pirate on the FM band after the FCC busted them for violating Part 15?? Answer NO, the rule has remained the same before and after all those pirates has been busted. Your claim that the FCC will tighten the rules because I might be violating Part 15 doesn't hold water. I suggest before you get on here and claim something that you better do some deep research into the matter. You bring up a good question, though. If it's so cheap and easy to get an experimental license, why didn't you get one for your operation on 13.556 MHz? Then this entire discussion would be moot. Because you can't get an experimental license for Broadcasting, many people has tried. Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
On 15 Sep 2006 10:46:19 -0700, N9OGL wrote:
From: "N9OGL" Subject: Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass. Date: 15 Sep 2006 10:46:19 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 54 Message-ID: . com NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.124.136.231 That IP address belongs to illinois.net, an organization which lists its purpose as follows: "The Illinois Century Network (ICN) is a telecommunications backbone providing high speed access to data, video, and audio communication in schools and libraries, at colleges and universities, to public libraries and museums, and for local government and state agencies." Just like Wiseman, you have to go somewhere else (Charleston) to post. Did your friend kick you off his CTI connection at 12.156.121.130 or did CTI? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com