| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
September 8th 06, 12:50 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
This could get interesting. Sc |
|
#2
September 8th 06, 01:11 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.usenet.kooks
|
|||
|
|||
|
trolling right along
|
|
#3
September 8th 06, 07:27 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00MHz LSB |
|
#4
September 8th 06, 09:15 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... |
|
#5
September 8th 06, 09:37 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so, The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. You see this isn't like K1MAN, there is a lot more too it then what you know.....and the FCC doesn't want to have to go the courts to explain themselves. Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB |
|
#6
September 9th 06, 06:20 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
N9OGL wrote: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think We already know that, Toad! |
|
#7
September 9th 06, 06:32 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
|
|
#8
September 9th 06, 11:19 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
"N9OGL" wrote in
ps.com: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so, The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. You see this isn't like K1MAN, there is a lot more too it then what you know.....and the FCC doesn't want to have to go the courts to explain themselves. Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB ROFLMAO They don't have to explain anything, you'll be the one to have to explain to them that you're sorry for the pirating with excessive power levels and that you promise never to do it again. SC |
|
#9
September 11th 06, 12:22 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
" wrote in
ups.com: Slow Code wrote: "N9OGL" wrote in ps.com: They don't have to explain anything, Wrong again Slow Code they have explain where Todd violated the rules I know you have no respect for the document but the consitition requires due process Hey Stupid, I got N9OGL's Omega One pirate station at S-4 and can hear every ****ty song Todd is playing with no effort at all, even with the attenuator in. Excessive power is a violation of the rule. N9OGL's due process is the full body cavity search they'll give him just before they throw him in the prison with AB8MQ if he don't pay the NAL when they slap his ass with it. SC |
|
#10
September 11th 06, 03:39 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
| ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | Policy | |||
| Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy | |||
Linear Mode
