Correction: I accidentally took the square root instead of squaring
the product of e*r. The correct value should be 0.003 microwatts for
an isotropic radiator to produce a 100 microvolt/meter field at three
meters! That's three thousandths of a microwatt, Todd.

Now tell me that 50 to 100 watts isn't way too much power ...

Stagger Lee wrote:
Correction: I accidentally took the square root instead of squaring
the product of e*r. The correct value should be 0.003 microwatts for
an isotropic radiator to produce a 100 microvolt/meter field at three
meters! That's three thousandths of a microwatt, Todd.

Now tell me that 50 to 100 watts isn't way too much power ...

I could really careless


Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO

Stagger Lee wrote:
Correction: I accidentally took the square root instead of squaring
the product of e*r. The correct value should be 0.003 microwatts for
an isotropic radiator to produce a 100 microvolt/meter field at three
meters! That's three thousandths of a microwatt, Todd.

Now tell me that 50 to 100 watts isn't way too much power ...

I could really care less


Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO

Saggytits Lee aka Stanley Lawson ****ed up again!:
Correction: I accidentally took the square root instead of squaring
the product of e*r. The correct value should be 0.003 microwatts for
an isotropic radiator to produce a 100 microvolt/meter field at three
meters!

Looks like you ****ed up as usual, it wasn't any "accident" on your
part, ****tard.

Like it was when you tried to claim an Alabama ARES website was one for
an ARES organization in West Virginia............

wrote:

fuuny thought it is what a meter says that counts

That's what happens when you attempt to think morkie.

wrote in message
...
On 26 Oct 2006 15:07:48 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey"
wrote:


wrote:

fuuny thought it is what a meter says that counts

That's what happens when you attempt to think morkie.
indeed it is and that is the fact

the FCC will not be impressed by any calualtiononly by the result

that you CAN't understand that FACT is why you show got cancelled


That is not as funny as seeing you get booted off QRZ, though...

wrote:

the FCC will not be impressed by any calualtiononly by the result

What the hell is "calualtiononly"?

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:16:32 +0000 (UTC), Stagger Lee
wrote:

On 26 Oct 2006 12:52:48 -0700, N9OGL wrote:
:
: wrote:
: N9OGL wrote:
: Omega One Radio is Now on 6.950.00 MHz Lower Side Band with a power
: output of 50 to 100 watts
:
: If this is for real, you are plain nuts.
:
: 6.950 is not an ISM/HiFER allocation in the US. Even a Canda ISM s
: 6.765-6.795.
:
:
: Canadian RSS-210 rules, Section 6.2.2 (e) permit operation in the same
: band but at slightly higher field strength, 15.5 mV/m at 30 m. Their
: frequency stability requirements are similar. Canada also has another
: license-free HF band not available in the USA; 6,765 - 6,795 kHz. Field
: strength and frequency limits are the same as those for 13,553 -13,567
: kHz.
:
: Terry
:
: Accually, there is band allocation in that band in the US is 100
: microvolts per meter @ 3 meters

A second back of the envelope calculation says you are way over the
legal field strength in this case too.
fuuny thought it is what a meter says that counts

My only advice to todd remains invest and use a good metter



Yeah, Todd. Get a better "metter"

Stagger Lee wrote in
:

On 26 Oct 2006 12:52:48 -0700, N9OGL wrote:
:
: wrote:
: N9OGL wrote:
: Omega One Radio is Now on 6.950.00 MHz Lower Side Band with a power
: output of 50 to 100 watts
:
: If this is for real, you are plain nuts.
:
: 6.950 is not an ISM/HiFER allocation in the US. Even a Canda ISM s
: 6.765-6.795.
:
:
: Canadian RSS-210 rules, Section 6.2.2 (e) permit operation in the
: same band but at slightly higher field strength, 15.5 mV/m at 30 m.
: Their frequency stability requirements are similar. Canada also has
: another license-free HF band not available in the USA; 6,765 - 6,795
: kHz. Field strength and frequency limits are the same as those for
: 13,553 -13,567 kHz.
:
: Terry
:
: Accually, there is band allocation in that band in the US is 100
: microvolts per meter @ 3 meters

A second back of the envelope calculation says you are way over the
legal field strength in this case too.


Todd doesn't care. We're all going laugh our asses off and have big party
after he gets Spanked. It's going to be hilarious. He always makes me
laugh when he shows up and attacks everyone.

SC

Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:16:32 +0000 (UTC), Stagger Lee
wrote:

On 26 Oct 2006 12:52:48 -0700, N9OGL wrote:
:
: wrote:
: N9OGL wrote:
: Omega One Radio is Now on 6.950.00 MHz Lower Side Band with a
: power output of 50 to 100 watts
:
: If this is for real, you are plain nuts.
:
: 6.950 is not an ISM/HiFER allocation in the US. Even a Canda ISM s
: 6.765-6.795.
:
:
: Canadian RSS-210 rules, Section 6.2.2 (e) permit operation in the
: same band but at slightly higher field strength, 15.5 mV/m at 30 m.
: Their frequency stability requirements are similar. Canada also has
: another license-free HF band not available in the USA; 6,765 - 6,795
: kHz. Field strength and frequency limits are the same as those for
: 13,553 -13,567 kHz.
:
: Terry
:
: Accually, there is band allocation in that band in the US is 100
: microvolts per meter @ 3 meters

A second back of the envelope calculation says you are way over the
legal field strength in this case too.
fuuny thought it is what a meter says that counts


Markie, shut the hell up.

You're not even smart enough to make a moon bounce contact.

SC