Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
: wrote in message ... On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "bradvk2qq" wrote in egroups.com: Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in. don't you knowsc? Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier to read. :-) Nah, you're just stupid and don't read well to begin with. Were you like Mark and rode the short bus to school? That might explain why you're not smart enough to get a real ham license. SC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. | Policy | |||
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio? | CB | |||
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio? | General | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | CB | |||
Trade Modded DX-398 For Scanner | Scanner |