"Art Harris" wrote in
oups.com:

See:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/....ap/index.html




That was a smart move for Rumsfeld. Why try to protect America and win
the wars when the democrats aren't going to let you win?

All along the democrats were more concerned about terrorist rights,
instead of terrorist deaths.

SC

"Slow Code" wrote in message
nk.net...
"Art Harris" wrote in
oups.com:

See:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/....ap/index.html




That was a smart move for Rumsfeld. Why try to protect America and win
the wars when the democrats aren't going to let you win?

All along the democrats were more concerned about terrorist rights,
instead of terrorist deaths.

SC

Hey, Dude, we don't agree on CW but otherwise you make a certain amount of
sense.

Harold
KD5SAK

Slow Code wrote:
"Art Harris" wrote in
oups.com:

See:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/....ap/index.html




That was a smart move for Rumsfeld. Why try to protect America and win
the wars when the democrats aren't going to let you win?

All along the democrats were more concerned about terrorist rights,
instead of terrorist deaths.

Good riddence, he should take Bush and Chaney with him.

Slow Code wrote:
See:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/....ap/index.html
..
That was a smart move for Rumsfeld. Why try to protect America and win
the wars when the democrats aren't going to let you win?

Oh? You think his strategy has been working well up until now with the
Republicans controlling the White House and both houses of Congress? If
you think the war is going well, I'd hate to see what bad is.

Art

Slow Code wrote:
"Art Harris" wrote in
oups.com:

See:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/....ap/index.html




That was a smart move for Rumsfeld. Why try to protect America and win
the wars when the democrats aren't going to let you win?

All along the democrats were more concerned about terrorist rights,
instead of terrorist deaths.

SC

U R an idiot...

JS

Where do these little peckers come from?


SC

"Art Harris" wrote in
oups.com:

Slow Code wrote:
See:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/....ap/index.html
.
That was a smart move for Rumsfeld. Why try to protect America and win
the wars when the democrats aren't going to let you win?

Oh? You think his strategy has been working well up until now with the
Republicans controlling the White House and both houses of Congress? If
you think the war is going well, I'd hate to see what bad is.

Art


Bad is when the enemy drives you out of the country.

SC

Slow Code wrote:
Where do these little peckers come from?


SC

Slow Idiot:

Let me then try but one more example, a bit different perhaps will cause
the revelation:

Remember from your history classes, there was a time when most if not
all the worlds peoples believed the world was flat and, that if one were
to set sail in a ship and venture too far, one would fall off the planet
(disk?) But yet, now we look back at these peoples and see the
blindness their foolishness and fears caused? We laugh at such childish
intellect.

Can you make a connection between the above and your own fear--that
maniac, illogical, simplistic, all consuming and quaint fear of life
without morse code which holds you in blind bondage? Face your fear and
be free man!

Regards,
JS

Slow Code wrote:
Where do these little peckers come from?


SC

Obviously you're just a troll. As soon as everyone quits feeding you,
you'll shrivel up and die.

IMO, it can't be too soon.

jak

I work with the military. Every US Army officer I have met despises
Rumsfeld. He has refused to listen to them from the very begining and fired
any general who tried to tell him he was wrong.

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

"Slow Code" wrote in message
nk.net...
"Art Harris" wrote in
oups.com:

See:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/....ap/index.html




That was a smart move for Rumsfeld. Why try to protect America and win
the wars when the democrats aren't going to let you win?

All along the democrats were more concerned about terrorist rights,
instead of terrorist deaths.

SC