POLL ABOUT CODE
 

If code is eliminated from US requirements, will you quit amateur radio? If
not, why not? If yes, why not leave now?

POLL ABOUT CODE
 

The code must remain, as we don't need the ham bands becoming like 11
meters. If you can't lean the code then you are too dumb to be an amateur.


"tools" wrote in message
...
If code is eliminated from US requirements, will you quit amateur radio?
If not, why not? If yes, why not leave now?

POLL ABOUT CODE
 

"tools" wrote in :

If code is eliminated from US requirements, will you quit amateur radio?
If not, why not? If yes, why not leave now?


No one is going to quit amateur radio because the code requirement was
eliminated, maybe a couple might. It's the retards that will flood the
bands afterwards that are going to drive good hams out of ham radio.

We already have one CB service, we don't need two.

SC

crapthon goes on
 

Slow Code wrote:
"tools" wrote in :

If code is eliminated from US requirements, will you quit amateur radio?
If not, why not? If yes, why not leave now?


No one is going to quit amateur radio because the code requirement was
eliminated, maybe a couple might. It's the retards that will flood the
bands afterwards that are going to drive good hams out of ham radio.

the retards are on the bands you have a license we just want to let
people without the mode welfare program you have depended on

We already have one CB service, we don't need two.

SC

POLL ABOUT CODE
 

Joe Bloe wrote in :

On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:02:12 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

"tools" wrote in
:

If code is eliminated from US requirements, will you quit amateur
radio? If not, why not? If yes, why not leave now?


No one is going to quit amateur radio because the code requirement was
eliminated, maybe a couple might. It's the retards that will flood the
bands afterwards that are going to drive good hams out of ham radio.

We already have one CB service, we don't need two.

SC
Hey Slow Code,

Did'ja totally forget about the 2 meter band? Oh yea. . How about
the 70CM band as well? Boy-O-boy Slow, I tell ya' right here and now,
I've heard just as bad "Ratchet-Jaw" or Drooling idiots who think
they HAVE to talk on those two bands, (Which of course require
Expensive Equipment and Testing with Licensing.), as I've ever heard
on the C.B.


Right. Eliminating the code requirement for the Tech license was a bad
idea and it let riff-raff on our VHF and UHF bands. They need to require
passing a CW test for the technician license again, or make the no-code
license one year non-renewable.

SC

POLL ABOUT CODE
 

"Only Fair" wrote in message
...
The code must remain, as we don't need the ham bands becoming like 11
meters. If you can't lean the code then you are too dumb to be an amateur.
And... how do you know that I do not know? Is it because I support ending
the requirement? You should check your facts before opening your yap.

"tools" wrote in message
...
If code is eliminated from US requirements, will you quit amateur radio?
If not, why not? If yes, why not leave now?

POLL ABOUT CODE
 

"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
"tools" wrote in :

If code is eliminated from US requirements, will you quit amateur radio?
If not, why not? If yes, why not leave now?


No one is going to quit amateur radio because the code requirement was
eliminated, maybe a couple might. It's the retards that will flood the
bands afterwards that are going to drive good hams out of ham radio.

We already have one CB service, we don't need two.

SC Radio and
the world will be far better when you leave.

kookathon
 

tools wrote:

you do post a lot for someone that I don't has yet typed a single word