If you hate CW or are too dumb or lazy to learn it, your retard ass needs
to stick with scanners, shortwave, cell phones, and CB. We don't need you
in ham radio.

SC

"DougSlug" wrote in
:

Troll, troll, troll your boat....


Stick with listening to police, fireman, baby monitors, and fast food
joints on a scanner, you're too lazy to be a good ham.


"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
If you hate CW or are too dumb or lazy to learn it, your retard ass
needs to stick with scanners, shortwave, cell phones, and CB. We don't
need you in ham radio.

SC

To All,

I found that the " blocked sender " feature in Outlook Express is of
tremendous help in all of the above groups.

b.j.


--
Reality is an hallucination brought
about by the lack of GOOD BEER !

The trouble with a code is that it is designed to keep people out. Once
you've learned the 'secret' code, it makes you feel that you have
something that you, and a select group of others can participate in.
Once you're up there, see how quickly you pull the ladder up.
Does a proficiency in CW make for a better operator? Yes, in a way. It
shows a studious interest in the hobby and is a worth achievement but
does it make a more courtious or interesting operator? Certainly not,
and this group is witness to that.
"People who don't use code are lazy", What? Is that the only discipline
available to allow someone to experiment with radio? Absolutely not!
How about learning electronics and building your own equipment? Is that
a lesser or a greater achievement?
How about taking the hobby forward by progressing and leading cutting
edge technologies? It was after all the amateur fraternity who brought
this new fangled SSB phone mode. Were are at the dawn of a new digital
age on all you people can do is look backwards and remain firmly rooted
in the seventeenth century.
Come on, wake up and smell the 21st century.

Juan Skinner wrote:
The trouble with a code is that it is designed to keep people out. Once
you've learned the 'secret' code, it makes you feel that you have
something that you, and a select group of others can participate in.
Once you're up there, see how quickly you pull the ladder up.
Does a proficiency in CW make for a better operator? Yes, in a way. It
shows a studious interest in the hobby and is a worth achievement but
does it make a more courtious or interesting operator? Certainly not,
and this group is witness to that.
"People who don't use code are lazy", What? Is that the only discipline
available to allow someone to experiment with radio? Absolutely not!
How about learning electronics and building your own equipment? Is that
a lesser or a greater achievement?
How about taking the hobby forward by progressing and leading cutting
edge technologies? It was after all the amateur fraternity who brought
this new fangled SSB phone mode. Were are at the dawn of a new digital
age on all you people can do is look backwards and remain firmly rooted
in the seventeenth century.

SSB is a period stain on the panties of radio communication. I hate
SSB. I prefer narrowband FM, or AM even, for quality and lack of
annying squawk. Baudot RTTY is fun too.

Make people build something to get the General license and make them
show competence to where a two way or broadcast facility would hire
them for the Extra.

"The True Ham Builds!"

"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
If you hate CW or are too dumb or lazy to learn it, your retard ass needs
to stick with scanners, shortwave, cell phones, and CB. We don't need you
in ham radio.

SC You need
to leave, it's not for you.

"tools" wrote in :


"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
If you hate CW or are too dumb or lazy to learn it, your retard ass
needs to stick with scanners, shortwave, cell phones, and CB. We don't
need you in ham radio.

SC

You need to leave, it's not for you.


I'll leave when there is no hope left. How are things in Lid-ville?

SC

Paul W. Schleck wrote in
:

In .com
writes:

Where is Paul Schleck these days? Here it is 1 December and
his "threatening" troika of "moderators" haven't yet appeared.
I wonder if he has been appointed to a new cabinet post? You
know, the "Department of Hamland Security"... :-)

Holiday regards,
LA

The member of our team that is finishing the final draft of the Request
for Discussion (RFD) agreed to a firm deadline of January 1, 2007. The
team has reviewed, and agreed to, prior working drafts of the RFD, as
well as submission guidelines for the proposed new newsgroup, so this is
just cleanup and tweaking at this point. The submission guidelines were
recently posted to misc.test.moderated. We will have an RFD to pass
along to the news.announce.newsgroups moderator to crosspost to this
newsgroup shortly after January 1st. Moving the discussion period to
after Christmas is also desirable in order to have a bigger audience for
the RFD, and give everyone ample opportunity to provide feedback free of
holiday distractions and time demands.

In the meantime, we've been testing the robomoderation software, Secure
Team-Based Usenet Moderation Program (STUMP). Several
rec.radio.amateur.policy participants have graciously agreed to send us
test submissions, many of which we have approved and posted to
misc.test.moderated. At this point, anyone reading this newsgroup is
welcome to send us test postings. Send such submissions to:



We'll process them as if they were actual submissions to the proposed
moderated newsgroup. Anything we approve will be posted to
misc.test.moderated, so please don't send anything to that address that
you don't want posted to Usenet, or at least add the text "not for
publication" or "do not approve." We would be particularly interested
in test postings that are PGP signed.

Watch this space for further information after the first of the year.

--
73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU


Good luck with it Paul. I look forward to seeing Markie, Lloydie, Woger,
Todd, Steve, Brian, Lenny, U-Know-Who, John, Robert, Jimmie, Scott and all
CW test haters and lazy asses put in the dumpster. It will make usenet a
much better place. And a real hams can save ham radio from the dumb it
downers.

Thanks, 73 de Slow Code

Slow Code wrote:
Paul W. Schleck wrote in
:

In .com
writes:

73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU


Good luck with it Paul. I look forward to seeing Markie, Lloydie, Woger,
Todd, Steve, Brian, Lenny, U-Know-Who, John, Robert, Jimmie, Scott and all
CW test haters and lazy asses put in the dumpster.

likely by then the test will be history but why would imagine it it
willstop and the rest from posting IF pauls ssytem shuts down one side
then the NG will die

It will make usenet a
much better place.

why?

And a real hams can save ham radio from the dumb it
downers.

real Hams have trying to save radio from the dumbed down code welfare
type like yourself

Thanks, 73 de Slow Code

Slow Code wrote:
Paul W. Schleck wrote in
:

In .com
writes:

Where is Paul Schleck these days? Here it is 1 December and
his "threatening" troika of "moderators" haven't yet appeared.
I wonder if he has been appointed to a new cabinet post? You
know, the "Department of Hamland Security"... :-)

Holiday regards,
LA

The member of our team that is finishing the final draft of the Request
for Discussion (RFD) agreed to a firm deadline of January 1, 2007. The
team has reviewed, and agreed to, prior working drafts of the RFD, as
well as submission guidelines for the proposed new newsgroup, so this is
just cleanup and tweaking at this point. The submission guidelines were
recently posted to misc.test.moderated. We will have an RFD to pass
along to the news.announce.newsgroups moderator to crosspost to this
newsgroup shortly after January 1st. Moving the discussion period to
after Christmas is also desirable in order to have a bigger audience for
the RFD, and give everyone ample opportunity to provide feedback free of
holiday distractions and time demands.

In the meantime, we've been testing the robomoderation software, Secure
Team-Based Usenet Moderation Program (STUMP). Several
rec.radio.amateur.policy participants have graciously agreed to send us
test submissions, many of which we have approved and posted to
misc.test.moderated. At this point, anyone reading this newsgroup is
welcome to send us test postings. Send such submissions to:



We'll process them as if they were actual submissions to the proposed
moderated newsgroup. Anything we approve will be posted to
misc.test.moderated, so please don't send anything to that address that
you don't want posted to Usenet, or at least add the text "not for
publication" or "do not approve." We would be particularly interested
in test postings that are PGP signed.

Watch this space for further information after the first of the year.

--
73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU


Good luck with it Paul. I look forward to seeing Markie, Lloydie, Woger,
....and all
CW test haters and lazy asses put in the dumpster.

Hey, dumb****, Roger passed 13 wpm CW for his General. Why don't you
know what the **** youare talking about before you run your uninformed
fat yap?