Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message ups.com... A lack of enforcement is a lack of enforcement, and a Morse Code Exam CANNOT be used as a substitute. If you recall, I've never been the one to claim it is any type of filter etc. I simply think it is one of the basics and for that reason believe a basic requirement is suitable. and there of course you are plain wrong Neither Morse code nor cw has been truly basic to Ham radio at any time in our history in making this statement you spout bogus propaganda Morse Code has NOTHING whatever to do with radio it just so happens to exist and was apllied to first spark (which sure isn't CW) as it was applied to various wired aplication indeed the Morse Code test know even prove one can use Morse Code (as can be seen by skimming the threads bashing newbie code users on QRZ) indeed with you Dee we have a clear case of the dmage done the ARS by Code testing we have an extra class our most tested therefore in theory our most knowledgable class of hma making down right stupid statement about what Ham radio is now it isn't entirely her fault of course she is product of th e system foisted on one by the FCC allowing the ARRL to decide what we needed to be real hams it is rather like the case in B5 of Akara 7 where the leader fed propagnad about what made a real Akaran to leath weapons and turned them loose during an invasion the result was the they repelled the in vasion and killed off all of the inhabitants of Akara 7 as well Dee Flint is a poster child for what went wrong with incentive licensing |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
another place the fruit can't post | Policy | |||
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio? | Antenna | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
Doing Battle? Can't Resist Posting? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General |