Bad followups
Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: If he had only been able to apologize for calling Mark a rapist... Nobody, including you and me, can prove that he is not a rapist. It's simply a fact of logic. The "he" that I used there did not refer to Mark. It was meant as an impersonal "he" which includes me. I cannot prove that I am not a rapist. It is generally impossible to prove a negative. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Bad followups
wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:08:16 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: wrote: If he had only been able to apologize for calling Mark a rapist... Nobody, including you and me, can prove that he is not a rapist. It's simply a fact of logic. The "he" that I used there did not refer to Mark. It was meant as an impersonal "he" which includes me. I cannot prove that I am not a rapist. It is generally impossible to prove a negative. indeed which is Why Robeson action in making that acussation are and remain despectable I have occionaly managed to prove a negitive but it is rough Sure you have, Mark. Just like you are a geophysicist, a Colonel in the Army, and a consultant. How does a person who cannot spell "negitive", prove one? |
Bad followups
Roger Leo wrote: wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:08:16 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote: I have occionaly managed to prove a negitive but it is rough Sure you have, Mark thank you . Just like you are a geophysicist,... nice of you to adknowledge ... a Colonel in the Army, ..... no I am Col and was in the army never said I was an army colnel ....and a consultant. as I am but none of these things involve proving a negitive How does a person who cannot spell "negitive", prove one? it take doing and is something I can only manage rarely |
Newsgroup Sociopaths
sociopaths never think the rules that aply t others apply to them Nice observation, Mark. You just described yourself to a "T". |
Newsgroup Sociopaths like ogwer and robeson
Roger Leo wrote: sociopaths never think the rules that aply t others apply to them Nice observation, Mark. thank you You just described yourself to a "T". nope the same rules apply to me as do the same rights I have the right to defend myself Robeson is nor you are vitctums of any action of mine |
Newsgroup Sociopaths
"an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Roger Leo wrote: sociopaths never think the rules that aply t others apply to them Nice observation, Mark. thank you You just described yourself to a "T". nope the same rules apply to me as do the same rights I have the right to defend myself Robeson is nor you are vitctums of any action of mine You are not a victim, nor are you defending yourself. You are a protagonist. Your fixation with Robesin has gone well past simply responding to his comments. You've turned into a stalker and your cruel comments about his deceased daughter put you on a nasty level far lower than anything Robesin has ever done. It is you who should seek professional counsel, not Wiseman. |
Bad followups
|
Bad followups
wrote: On 14 Jan 2007 12:04:58 -0800, wrote: Roger Leo wrote: wrote in message ps.com... Tex wrote: Considering the FACT that Mark posts hundreds of times to Steve's occasional post, the "problem" exists solely in Mark Morgan's jumbled noggin'. It wasn't always that way. At one time attribute forging, thread-jacking and avalanches of postings were the exclusive domain of Robesin. What you are witnessing now is Robesin's tactics turned against Robesin, i.e., "out-assholing" Robesin. Don't like it? You've had almost a decade to speak up, and didn't. Best of Luck. Well, Mark has certainly "out-assholed" just about everybody in these groups, save for yourself perhaps. Again, using Robesin as an excuse to post 300 to 400 times a week, and to crap on as many posts as he can is folly. Even YOU should be capable of realizing that. Thanks for not forging the attribute chain in your response. I appreciate it. Mark is rude. He is thoughtless. Robesin didn't cause that. I could touch on Mark's obvious mental illness, but there is little need for that, is there? Sure, Mark has dyslexia. Too bad. to corect you Dyslxia is a Disabilty not a Mental Illness Got it. Robesin was the catalyst for many of the problems in this group. If he had only been able to apologize for calling Mark a rapist..., and instead sues Mark (Mark is still waiting to be served). His mental stability has been the focus of numerous postings. inded that apolgilogy would have or just answer vaguely sane answer to the question of "why is my sexaulity relavant to Ham radio? if he could have answered that it would have also stopp more than a year ago Robesin can't do the stand-up thing. Instead he sues you, and then posts the infamous excrement eating post. today it could stopp but would take a bit more on his on the annymouses Some of the anymous posting are Robesin. |
Newsgroup Sociopaths
Roger Leo wrote: sociopaths never think the rules that aply t others apply to them Nice observation, Mark. You just described yourself to a "T". Steve, I see Mark describing Robesin. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com