| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
January 11th 07, 04:56 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated
wrote: On 10 Jan 2007 20:10:12 -0800, wrote: Katie wrote: You can't be serious. Why not include you? Because your objectionable and continually disruptive behaviour preceeds you, Mark. Your record with QRZ is one indicator, but the other, and worst, is that you were summarily banned from the very bottom-feeder of groups, the Nim Busters board. BTW I just noticed this lie I have not been banned from Nimbusters indeed according to the admin nobody is currectly banned Your vote and/or comments is just what a new, moderated group does NOT need. YOU are exactly what a moderated group is, by design, intending to prohibit. You are solely responsible for your bed of thorns, Mark. Now lay in, accept it, and stop whining. Robesin, why do you lie about not posting anonymously? indeed it may well be Robeson Sounds like him. Lots of CAPS, use of "summarily" and ordering you to lay in you "bed of thorns." Sheesh. I think all he learned from the USMC was the drama from the guys in the campaign hats. Or from watching too "Stripes" once too often. any coment of the propoasol for moderation BB? We've gone from Paul talking about this stuff a year ago to "POOF!" a whole list of moderators and consultants, many of whom I've never heard of and the others posting very infrequently, complete with a constitution, articles of incorporation, and rules of enagement. So when did all this happen? And wh6hz thinks he gets to vote! Hi, hi! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Were the moderated newsgroup proponents just blowing smoke? | Policy | |||
| VOTE, Moderated or Free Speech? | Policy | |||
| Conversion To Moderated Group | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
