LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 27th 07, 12:53 AM posted to
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default Dloyd cyber vandal and stalker

On Mar 26, 7:34 pm, "Chris" wrote:
On 26 Mar 2007 16:20:33 -0700, an_old_asshole wrote:

nope nothing says I may not unintetnional dispurt a NG

Everyone - including Hughes - says you may NOT intentionally disrupt
Usenet and keep on doing business with them.

agreed but what is your point? I do not intentionaly disruprt USENET
some disruption does occour as an incidental result result of my
exercising legitmate self defence

you are arguing that if a Ham unintentional does interfer with another
ham that is automaticaly jamming

such dispurtion as a ocours mby action is inecedental to the primary

Dloyd has admited he has delieberatly provoked the response the
intentional disruptor of the NG is therefore Dloyd who on his blog
threatens further action if I do not exceed to his demands

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dloyd Lavies cyber vandal and stalker an_old_friend General 0 March 27th 07 12:20 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.

About Us

"It's about Radio"


Copyright © 2017