Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Keith ) writes:
On 25 Jul 2003 16:37:40 GMT, Alun Palmer wrote: s97.301(e) reads: For a station having a control operator who has been granted an operator license of Novice Class or Technician Class and who has received credit for proficiency in telegraphy in accordance with the international requirements. (followed by frequency table) The 'international requirements' (ITU-R s25.5) now read: Administrations shall determine whether or not a person seeking a licence to operate an amateur station shall demonstrate the ability to send and receive texts in Morse code signals. There is no international requirement for proficiency in telegraphy, so arguably any Tech could operate on all the frequencies listed in the table. Be prepared to argue it in court, though! That is what I'm talking about. There is no longer a international requirement for morse code so tech's can pick up the microphone and talk on 10 meters. Here in America the FCC has to issue a warning notice, then a violation notice and the person cited can then simply demand a hearing before a administrative law judge. The ALJ is a pretty informal process and you just need to cite the rules and they are not very strict when it comes to matters like these. If you have a tech license and you operate outside your allowed bands like pop up in the twenty meter band and keep it up they might come after you. But if you meet the international requirements and stay in the HF TECH bands it is not a violation of the rules and no one can verify if you have passed a horse and buggy CW test any god damn way. This is silly. Each country has it's own laws, and you are obliged to follow them. What has changed is that the treaty agreement whereby all countries issuing amateur radio licenses are obliged to have a code test of some sort for operating below 30MHz (or, was it a higher frequency?) is now gone. That means that each country no longer has to conform to that treaty agreement. They can, if they so choose, to eliminate their law that requires code proficiency for amateurs operating in the HF bands. But they are not obligated to do so. Until a country changes it's law about this, everyone is obligated to follow those laws. Just because the treaty agreement is gone does not mean that there is any more legality for someone who hasn't taken a code test to operate at HF. Two months ago, someone could have done it, and if caught they would face a certain process. If they do it today, and are caught, they face the same certain process. Nothing has changed on that account. Michael VE2BVW |