| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
You could always eliminate the middleman and give your paycheck directly
to people who don't feel like working. Then again, the politicians would be out of a job of skimming the cream off the top, and they would join the ranks of people who you would be giving your paycheck to. Oh wait, they win either way!!! Who makes these rules? Oh, wait!!! I'm starting to understand. But to keep this post in line with the rules,... Here in New Hampshire, I've noticed that there are places between mountains that we lose cell reception but VHF/UHF is fine, and vice versa. And 6 meters is almost always better for hilly coverage. The state police still use low band (46 MHz or so). Anyone else notice in hilly states (Tenn, Calif, etc.) have more 6m repeaters than usual? Dave KZ1O -- This file is PureMail protected. To reply to the sender, you MUST include this in the subject line: M321I58DNU 09/06/2003 (without that string in the subject, your message will be deleted, unread) Shadow of James wrote: Is there any way to vote OTHER than Republican? "RFburns" wrote in message ... On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:06:05 -0500, Dan/W4NTI wrote: You obviously don't have a common ground. The only 'ground' you have is from the antenna mount, via the coax shield, to your radio. When you hook your ground post to the chassis you have extended the 'ground' and caused a higher swr. Why, Dan, you actually know what you are talking about this time! Inhaling those nerve gas remnants has apparently caused your synapses to reconnect in ways that lead to valid insights into RF problems. Next, you'll be registering as a Republican. |
You could always eliminate the middleman and give your paycheck directly
to people who don't feel like working. Then again, the politicians would be out of a job of skimming the cream off the top, and they would join the ranks of people who you would be giving your paycheck to. Oh wait, they win either way!!! Who makes these rules? Oh, wait!!! I'm starting to understand. But to keep this post in line with the rules,... Here in New Hampshire, I've noticed that there are places between mountains that we lose cell reception but VHF/UHF is fine, and vice versa. And 6 meters is almost always better for hilly coverage. The state police still use low band (46 MHz or so). Anyone else notice in hilly states (Tenn, Calif, etc.) have more 6m repeaters than usual? Dave KZ1O -- This file is PureMail protected. To reply to the sender, you MUST include this in the subject line: M321I58DNU 09/06/2003 (without that string in the subject, your message will be deleted, unread) Shadow of James wrote: Is there any way to vote OTHER than Republican? "RFburns" wrote in message ... On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:06:05 -0500, Dan/W4NTI wrote: You obviously don't have a common ground. The only 'ground' you have is from the antenna mount, via the coax shield, to your radio. When you hook your ground post to the chassis you have extended the 'ground' and caused a higher swr. Why, Dan, you actually know what you are talking about this time! Inhaling those nerve gas remnants has apparently caused your synapses to reconnect in ways that lead to valid insights into RF problems. Next, you'll be registering as a Republican. |
Not these days. After the Demoncrats fielded Clinton Gore I guess Im more
of a anti-democrat. Dan/W4NTI "Shadow of James" wrote in message link.net... Is there any way to vote OTHER than Republican? "RFburns" wrote in message ... On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:06:05 -0500, Dan/W4NTI wrote: You obviously don't have a common ground. The only 'ground' you have is from the antenna mount, via the coax shield, to your radio. When you hook your ground post to the chassis you have extended the 'ground' and caused a higher swr. Why, Dan, you actually know what you are talking about this time! Inhaling those nerve gas remnants has apparently caused your synapses to reconnect in ways that lead to valid insights into RF problems. Next, you'll be registering as a Republican. |
Not these days. After the Demoncrats fielded Clinton Gore I guess Im more
of a anti-democrat. Dan/W4NTI "Shadow of James" wrote in message link.net... Is there any way to vote OTHER than Republican? "RFburns" wrote in message ... On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:06:05 -0500, Dan/W4NTI wrote: You obviously don't have a common ground. The only 'ground' you have is from the antenna mount, via the coax shield, to your radio. When you hook your ground post to the chassis you have extended the 'ground' and caused a higher swr. Why, Dan, you actually know what you are talking about this time! Inhaling those nerve gas remnants has apparently caused your synapses to reconnect in ways that lead to valid insights into RF problems. Next, you'll be registering as a Republican. |
Quite a common thing Dave. In fact ten meter FM is even better in hilly
terrain. The higher the frequency, the smaller the wavelength. Thus it is more subject to scatter, reflection, absorption, etc. However in some cases you will find 70 cm is better for the urban city invironment. Dan/W4NTI "Dave Bushong" wrote in message ... You could always eliminate the middleman and give your paycheck directly to people who don't feel like working. Then again, the politicians would be out of a job of skimming the cream off the top, and they would join the ranks of people who you would be giving your paycheck to. Oh wait, they win either way!!! Who makes these rules? Oh, wait!!! I'm starting to understand. But to keep this post in line with the rules,... Here in New Hampshire, I've noticed that there are places between mountains that we lose cell reception but VHF/UHF is fine, and vice versa. And 6 meters is almost always better for hilly coverage. The state police still use low band (46 MHz or so). Anyone else notice in hilly states (Tenn, Calif, etc.) have more 6m repeaters than usual? Dave KZ1O -- This file is PureMail protected. To reply to the sender, you MUST include this in the subject line: M321I58DNU 09/06/2003 (without that string in the subject, your message will be deleted, unread) Shadow of James wrote: Is there any way to vote OTHER than Republican? "RFburns" wrote in message ... On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:06:05 -0500, Dan/W4NTI wrote: You obviously don't have a common ground. The only 'ground' you have is from the antenna mount, via the coax shield, to your radio. When you hook your ground post to the chassis you have extended the 'ground' and caused a higher swr. Why, Dan, you actually know what you are talking about this time! Inhaling those nerve gas remnants has apparently caused your synapses to reconnect in ways that lead to valid insights into RF problems. Next, you'll be registering as a Republican. |
Quite a common thing Dave. In fact ten meter FM is even better in hilly
terrain. The higher the frequency, the smaller the wavelength. Thus it is more subject to scatter, reflection, absorption, etc. However in some cases you will find 70 cm is better for the urban city invironment. Dan/W4NTI "Dave Bushong" wrote in message ... You could always eliminate the middleman and give your paycheck directly to people who don't feel like working. Then again, the politicians would be out of a job of skimming the cream off the top, and they would join the ranks of people who you would be giving your paycheck to. Oh wait, they win either way!!! Who makes these rules? Oh, wait!!! I'm starting to understand. But to keep this post in line with the rules,... Here in New Hampshire, I've noticed that there are places between mountains that we lose cell reception but VHF/UHF is fine, and vice versa. And 6 meters is almost always better for hilly coverage. The state police still use low band (46 MHz or so). Anyone else notice in hilly states (Tenn, Calif, etc.) have more 6m repeaters than usual? Dave KZ1O -- This file is PureMail protected. To reply to the sender, you MUST include this in the subject line: M321I58DNU 09/06/2003 (without that string in the subject, your message will be deleted, unread) Shadow of James wrote: Is there any way to vote OTHER than Republican? "RFburns" wrote in message ... On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:06:05 -0500, Dan/W4NTI wrote: You obviously don't have a common ground. The only 'ground' you have is from the antenna mount, via the coax shield, to your radio. When you hook your ground post to the chassis you have extended the 'ground' and caused a higher swr. Why, Dan, you actually know what you are talking about this time! Inhaling those nerve gas remnants has apparently caused your synapses to reconnect in ways that lead to valid insights into RF problems. Next, you'll be registering as a Republican. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:12 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com