Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Assuming your concept was valid, i.e. signal strength was a function of distance by
some formula (inverse square), the approach to follow is called least squares. Look around for additional info with that terminology. - jlw Scott in Aztlan wrote: Suppose you were participating in a search for a hidden radio transmitter, only instead of the usual radio receiver with a directional antenna you have a receiver with an omnidirectional antenna and a GPS receiver. As you wander around, you collect positions from the GPS and signal strength values at those positions from the radio; your goal is to crunch these data points into an estimate of the transmitter's location. Clearly you could use trilateration with any 3 of the data points and get an estimate, but how would you make use of the fact that you have an arbitrary number of data points? Isn't there some algorithm which, the more data points it is given, the better its estimate gets (similar to the way you can average a series of position readings taken from a stationary GPS receiver to compensate for the effects of SA)? Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks! -- Friends don't let friends shop at Best Buy. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jerry L. Wahl" wrote in
: Assuming your concept was valid, i.e. signal strength was a function of distance by some formula (inverse square), the approach to follow is called least squares. Look around for additional info with that terminology. - jlw I participate in a lot of transmitter hunts. I hadn't thought of it but you are on to something. I wouldn't recommend finding a transmitter using the method he wants to do it in, that would take too much time. He would also need an attenuator to prevent full scale readings. If he wants to hunt with an omni, all he needs really is a step attenuator and a receiver with an S-meter. Leave the GPS at home. A faster method is with a directional or null antenna, attenuator, map, protractor, and possibly compass so he can put the headings on the map more accurately. I was thinking of using GPS too, but here is how I would do it. I have a 4 antenna doppler array that gives real time headings. The array is mounted on my vehicle. The doppler unit sends four bit BCD to a 16 LED heading indicator. I would pull the BCD readings and send them to a notebook computer with a mapping program installed and the GPS connected. The program code would take the heading from the doppler unit, the receiving position from the GPS, and superimpose it on the map. The code would also have an "averaging algorithem" to throw out bad heading do to reflections and such. I would only do something like this to show how nifty you could find a transmitter. Will I do this? Probably not, I already do it in my head. KB7ADL |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I also wanted to give this link: www.homingin.com
KB7ADL "Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL" wrote in ink.net: "Jerry L. Wahl" wrote in : Assuming your concept was valid, i.e. signal strength was a function of distance by some formula (inverse square), the approach to follow is called least squares. Look around for additional info with that terminology. - jlw I participate in a lot of transmitter hunts. I hadn't thought of it but you are on to something. I wouldn't recommend finding a transmitter using the method he wants to do it in, that would take too much time. He would also need an attenuator to prevent full scale readings. If he wants to hunt with an omni, all he needs really is a step attenuator and a receiver with an S-meter. Leave the GPS at home. A faster method is with a directional or null antenna, attenuator, map, protractor, and possibly compass so he can put the headings on the map more accurately. I was thinking of using GPS too, but here is how I would do it. I have a 4 antenna doppler array that gives real time headings. The array is mounted on my vehicle. The doppler unit sends four bit BCD to a 16 LED heading indicator. I would pull the BCD readings and send them to a notebook computer with a mapping program installed and the GPS connected. The program code would take the heading from the doppler unit, the receiving position from the GPS, and superimpose it on the map. The code would also have an "averaging algorithem" to throw out bad heading do to reflections and such. I would only do something like this to show how nifty you could find a transmitter. Will I do this? Probably not, I already do it in my head. KB7ADL |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I also wanted to give this link: www.homingin.com
KB7ADL "Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL" wrote in ink.net: "Jerry L. Wahl" wrote in : Assuming your concept was valid, i.e. signal strength was a function of distance by some formula (inverse square), the approach to follow is called least squares. Look around for additional info with that terminology. - jlw I participate in a lot of transmitter hunts. I hadn't thought of it but you are on to something. I wouldn't recommend finding a transmitter using the method he wants to do it in, that would take too much time. He would also need an attenuator to prevent full scale readings. If he wants to hunt with an omni, all he needs really is a step attenuator and a receiver with an S-meter. Leave the GPS at home. A faster method is with a directional or null antenna, attenuator, map, protractor, and possibly compass so he can put the headings on the map more accurately. I was thinking of using GPS too, but here is how I would do it. I have a 4 antenna doppler array that gives real time headings. The array is mounted on my vehicle. The doppler unit sends four bit BCD to a 16 LED heading indicator. I would pull the BCD readings and send them to a notebook computer with a mapping program installed and the GPS connected. The program code would take the heading from the doppler unit, the receiving position from the GPS, and superimpose it on the map. The code would also have an "averaging algorithem" to throw out bad heading do to reflections and such. I would only do something like this to show how nifty you could find a transmitter. Will I do this? Probably not, I already do it in my head. KB7ADL |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL wrote: I participate in a lot of transmitter hunts. If he wants to hunt with an omni, all he needs really is a step attenuator and a receiver with an S-meter. Leave the GPS at home. I was thinking of using GPS too, but here is how I would do it. I have a 4 antenna doppler array that gives real time headings. The array is mounted on my vehicle. The doppler unit sends four bit BCD to a 16 LED heading indicator. I believe there is a kit you can build: http://www.ramseyelectronics.com/cgi...ction&key=DDF1 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL wrote: I participate in a lot of transmitter hunts. If he wants to hunt with an omni, all he needs really is a step attenuator and a receiver with an S-meter. Leave the GPS at home. I was thinking of using GPS too, but here is how I would do it. I have a 4 antenna doppler array that gives real time headings. The array is mounted on my vehicle. The doppler unit sends four bit BCD to a 16 LED heading indicator. I believe there is a kit you can build: http://www.ramseyelectronics.com/cgi...ction&key=DDF1 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jerry L. Wahl" wrote in
: Assuming your concept was valid, i.e. signal strength was a function of distance by some formula (inverse square), the approach to follow is called least squares. Look around for additional info with that terminology. - jlw I participate in a lot of transmitter hunts. I hadn't thought of it but you are on to something. I wouldn't recommend finding a transmitter using the method he wants to do it in, that would take too much time. He would also need an attenuator to prevent full scale readings. If he wants to hunt with an omni, all he needs really is a step attenuator and a receiver with an S-meter. Leave the GPS at home. A faster method is with a directional or null antenna, attenuator, map, protractor, and possibly compass so he can put the headings on the map more accurately. I was thinking of using GPS too, but here is how I would do it. I have a 4 antenna doppler array that gives real time headings. The array is mounted on my vehicle. The doppler unit sends four bit BCD to a 16 LED heading indicator. I would pull the BCD readings and send them to a notebook computer with a mapping program installed and the GPS connected. The program code would take the heading from the doppler unit, the receiving position from the GPS, and superimpose it on the map. The code would also have an "averaging algorithem" to throw out bad heading do to reflections and such. I would only do something like this to show how nifty you could find a transmitter. Will I do this? Probably not, I already do it in my head. KB7ADL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|