Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 20th 03, 11:19 PM
KC0???
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You just don't get it do ya, DUMBASS. Were you there? I was. It did go
down. It did not work. It failed, and so do you pudding cup. Bite my ass.






"Lloyd" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:26:57 -0400, KC0??? wrote:
No he didn't forget! He let it out on PURPOSE! Echolink is a joke.......


Because it didn't go down. You see, oh net-clueless one, Echolink has
multiple servers all across the country, and it's not possible to kill
all of those servers with a power outage.

Anybody using a battery-powered laptop with a phoneline or satellite
link would have stayed in business just fine. It's no different than
using an emergency-powered ham station, except that it's a lot more
reliable.

Echolink is the wave of the future AND YOU JUST CAN'T STAND IT!!!!



  #12   Report Post  
Old September 20th 03, 11:44 PM
charlesb
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Lloyd" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:26:57 -0400, KC0??? wrote:
No he didn't forget! He let it out on PURPOSE! Echolink is a joke.......


Because it didn't go down. You see, oh net-clueless one, Echolink has
multiple servers all across the country, and it's not possible to kill
all of those servers with a power outage.


Lloyd is right, you know.... The only part of EchoLink that shut down was
the part that was in the area affected by the emergency, when the power went
off.

In places unaffected by the emergency, it worked just fine! In this respect,
EchoLink is every bit as valid and effective as a phone number you can dial
to report a problem when the phone lines go dead. As long as there is no
emergency the system works just fine!

Once the power shut down in the affected area and EchoLink went belly-up,
the real Hams were still able to communicate with Ham Radio by use of
battery power, as in their vehicles, or with power from a generator... Only
the non-Ham stuff like EchoLink was dead, and in many parts of the
northeast, EchoLink is still dead as this is being written, a few days after
the storm hit.

No power, no phones - No EchoLink... That's one difference between EchoLink
and Ham Radio.

Amateur Radio is independent of non-ham communications carriers; EchoLink of
course is not. Not independent, and not Ham Radio.

Anybody using a battery-powered laptop with a phoneline or satellite
link would have stayed in business just fine.


Grasping at straws already, huh? Didn't take long, did it?

In packet radio, we call the "amateur telephone" devotees who cannot
differentiate between Ham Radio and the non-Ham stuff "LandLine Lids". I
suppose you must be another type of LandLine Lid.

You know.... The kind of guy whose idea of responding to an emergency *as a
ham* is to demonstrate their ability to use the telephone. Since he's a Ham,
his phone conversation is of course "ham radio"... Riiiiiight!
;-)

It's no different than
using an emergency-powered ham station, except that it's a lot more
reliable.


I'd ask the hams in the areas with no power before I put forward any radical
statements about how "reliable" EchoLink is with no Internet connection. You
don't want to end up looking stupid and dishonest by making unsupported and
unsupportable statements, do you?


Echolink is the wave of the future AND YOU JUST CAN'T STAND IT!!!!


EchoLink is an Internet chat, nothing more and nothing less. As far as that
goes, it is no better or worse than any other Internet chat. The only
unfortunate part about it is that some people are easily confused by
EchoLink, thinking that it is Ham Radio. It distracts them from the real
thing, leaving them totally helpless and unprepared in the case of an
emergency.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL


  #13   Report Post  
Old September 20th 03, 11:44 PM
charlesb
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Lloyd" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:26:57 -0400, KC0??? wrote:
No he didn't forget! He let it out on PURPOSE! Echolink is a joke.......


Because it didn't go down. You see, oh net-clueless one, Echolink has
multiple servers all across the country, and it's not possible to kill
all of those servers with a power outage.


Lloyd is right, you know.... The only part of EchoLink that shut down was
the part that was in the area affected by the emergency, when the power went
off.

In places unaffected by the emergency, it worked just fine! In this respect,
EchoLink is every bit as valid and effective as a phone number you can dial
to report a problem when the phone lines go dead. As long as there is no
emergency the system works just fine!

Once the power shut down in the affected area and EchoLink went belly-up,
the real Hams were still able to communicate with Ham Radio by use of
battery power, as in their vehicles, or with power from a generator... Only
the non-Ham stuff like EchoLink was dead, and in many parts of the
northeast, EchoLink is still dead as this is being written, a few days after
the storm hit.

No power, no phones - No EchoLink... That's one difference between EchoLink
and Ham Radio.

Amateur Radio is independent of non-ham communications carriers; EchoLink of
course is not. Not independent, and not Ham Radio.

Anybody using a battery-powered laptop with a phoneline or satellite
link would have stayed in business just fine.


Grasping at straws already, huh? Didn't take long, did it?

In packet radio, we call the "amateur telephone" devotees who cannot
differentiate between Ham Radio and the non-Ham stuff "LandLine Lids". I
suppose you must be another type of LandLine Lid.

You know.... The kind of guy whose idea of responding to an emergency *as a
ham* is to demonstrate their ability to use the telephone. Since he's a Ham,
his phone conversation is of course "ham radio"... Riiiiiight!
;-)

It's no different than
using an emergency-powered ham station, except that it's a lot more
reliable.


I'd ask the hams in the areas with no power before I put forward any radical
statements about how "reliable" EchoLink is with no Internet connection. You
don't want to end up looking stupid and dishonest by making unsupported and
unsupportable statements, do you?


Echolink is the wave of the future AND YOU JUST CAN'T STAND IT!!!!


EchoLink is an Internet chat, nothing more and nothing less. As far as that
goes, it is no better or worse than any other Internet chat. The only
unfortunate part about it is that some people are easily confused by
EchoLink, thinking that it is Ham Radio. It distracts them from the real
thing, leaving them totally helpless and unprepared in the case of an
emergency.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL


  #14   Report Post  
Old September 20th 03, 11:54 PM
Robert Casey
 
Posts: n/a
Default




Anybody using a battery-powered laptop with a phoneline or satellite
link would have stayed in business just fine.

As long as that phone line doesn't go down. Satellite link would be
better if the
signal doesn't mind going thru rain saturated skies.

It's no different than
using an emergency-powered ham station, except that it's a lot more
reliable.

If Echolink works, then other internet comms would also work as well.
It's an extra tool, nice to have, but it doesn't replace radio.


Echolink is the wave of the future AND YOU JUST CAN'T STAND IT!!!!




  #15   Report Post  
Old September 20th 03, 11:54 PM
Robert Casey
 
Posts: n/a
Default




Anybody using a battery-powered laptop with a phoneline or satellite
link would have stayed in business just fine.

As long as that phone line doesn't go down. Satellite link would be
better if the
signal doesn't mind going thru rain saturated skies.

It's no different than
using an emergency-powered ham station, except that it's a lot more
reliable.

If Echolink works, then other internet comms would also work as well.
It's an extra tool, nice to have, but it doesn't replace radio.


Echolink is the wave of the future AND YOU JUST CAN'T STAND IT!!!!






  #16   Report Post  
Old September 21st 03, 02:16 AM
Beloved Leader #4
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Lloyd" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:26:57 -0400, KC0??? wrote:
No he didn't forget! He let it out on PURPOSE! Echolink is a

joke.......

Because it didn't go down. You see, oh net-clueless one, Echolink has
multiple servers all across the country, and it's not possible to kill
all of those servers with a power outage.

Anybody using a battery-powered laptop with a phoneline or satellite
link would have stayed in business just fine. It's no different than
using an emergency-powered ham station, except that it's a lot more
reliable.

Echolink is the wave of the future AND YOU JUST CAN'T STAND IT!!!!


Well said !!

Echolink's performance during the Hurricane
Emergency exposed the TECHNOLOGICAL
OBSOLENCE of traditional SSB Amateur Radio.

And there's N O B O D Y who can dispute that
from a rational technological perspective.

  #17   Report Post  
Old September 21st 03, 02:16 AM
Beloved Leader #4
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Lloyd" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:26:57 -0400, KC0??? wrote:
No he didn't forget! He let it out on PURPOSE! Echolink is a

joke.......

Because it didn't go down. You see, oh net-clueless one, Echolink has
multiple servers all across the country, and it's not possible to kill
all of those servers with a power outage.

Anybody using a battery-powered laptop with a phoneline or satellite
link would have stayed in business just fine. It's no different than
using an emergency-powered ham station, except that it's a lot more
reliable.

Echolink is the wave of the future AND YOU JUST CAN'T STAND IT!!!!


Well said !!

Echolink's performance during the Hurricane
Emergency exposed the TECHNOLOGICAL
OBSOLENCE of traditional SSB Amateur Radio.

And there's N O B O D Y who can dispute that
from a rational technological perspective.

  #18   Report Post  
Old September 21st 03, 02:32 AM
charlesb
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Another no-callsign Troll, running down amateur radio on a ham radio
newsgroup.

(yawn)

Charles Brabham, N5PVL


"Beloved Leader #4" wrote in message
...

"Lloyd" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:26:57 -0400, KC0??? wrote:
No he didn't forget! He let it out on PURPOSE! Echolink is a

joke.......

Because it didn't go down. You see, oh net-clueless one, Echolink has
multiple servers all across the country, and it's not possible to kill
all of those servers with a power outage.

Anybody using a battery-powered laptop with a phoneline or satellite
link would have stayed in business just fine. It's no different than
using an emergency-powered ham station, except that it's a lot more
reliable.

Echolink is the wave of the future AND YOU JUST CAN'T STAND IT!!!!


Well said !!

Echolink's performance during the Hurricane
Emergency exposed the TECHNOLOGICAL
OBSOLENCE of traditional SSB Amateur Radio.

And there's N O B O D Y who can dispute that
from a rational technological perspective.



  #19   Report Post  
Old September 21st 03, 02:32 AM
charlesb
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Another no-callsign Troll, running down amateur radio on a ham radio
newsgroup.

(yawn)

Charles Brabham, N5PVL


"Beloved Leader #4" wrote in message
...

"Lloyd" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:26:57 -0400, KC0??? wrote:
No he didn't forget! He let it out on PURPOSE! Echolink is a

joke.......

Because it didn't go down. You see, oh net-clueless one, Echolink has
multiple servers all across the country, and it's not possible to kill
all of those servers with a power outage.

Anybody using a battery-powered laptop with a phoneline or satellite
link would have stayed in business just fine. It's no different than
using an emergency-powered ham station, except that it's a lot more
reliable.

Echolink is the wave of the future AND YOU JUST CAN'T STAND IT!!!!


Well said !!

Echolink's performance during the Hurricane
Emergency exposed the TECHNOLOGICAL
OBSOLENCE of traditional SSB Amateur Radio.

And there's N O B O D Y who can dispute that
from a rational technological perspective.



  #20   Report Post  
Old September 21st 03, 06:42 AM
Dean
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 20 Sep 2003 23:04:25 GMT, Lloyd wrote:

On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 18:19:06 -0400, KC0??? wrote:
You just don't get it do ya, DUMBASS. Were you there? I was. It did go
down. It did not work. It failed, and so do you pudding cup. Bite my ass.


It didn't go down. I was on the hurricane net via nasouth at the time
and listened to multiple stations from the affected area check in
throughout all of Thursday afternoon. The exercise will be written up
in both QST and CQ in a couple of months, from what I understand.

Just because YOUR connection went down, Chicken Little, doesn't mean
that the whole world's went down. It just means that you don't have
the technical smarts to deal with new technologies like Echolink and
IRLP (which is connected to Echolink, BTW).

So bite MY ass, Goldilocks, and go back to your appliance operations.
You clearly shouldn't be hanging out with the big boys of ham radio.


Get your General lardass or shut the hell up. You'll wait until the
code is done away with then get your HF privileges. Too bad you can't
sting up a dipole in your 1 bedroom apartment, lardass.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EchoLink and Hurricane Isabel Caveat Lector Dx 10 September 24th 03 08:18 PM
EchoLink and Hurricane Isabel Caveat Lector Dx 0 September 20th 03 05:54 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews General 0 September 20th 03 04:12 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews General 0 September 20th 03 04:12 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 20th 03 04:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017