Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brian Reay" wrote in message ... "Airy R. Bean" wrote in message ... Your 5 minutes web search has not revealed the theory behind the gravity escapement, a form of remontoire, a means to decouple the pendulum from the going train One of the fundamental problems in time pieces is the decoupling of the escapement from the oscillating element- not from the going train. The issue is ensuring that the oscillation period is not changed by the two functions of the escapement a) to provide the impulse b) to allow the going train to advance at a rate controlled by the oscillator (eg the pendulum). If you think about it, there is an analogy to Q here. In (a) I include the added complications of ensuring an impulse largely constant despite variations in the state of the spring (if used). I should have added that the later is the problem addressed by the "remontoire" (and more crudely by a fusee). Neither address the issue of the interference with the free oscillation of the pendulum or balance. If your clock is weight driven, why have a "remontoire"? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
not cutting excess wire beyond antenna | Antenna | |||
Filament Question | Boatanchors |