On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:30:38 +0100, "Thierry" Thierry, see
http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/ wrote:


Your mind wide open as I see, like as all "anonymous" post. Pfff.
You do really not reflect the ham spirit. Its a pity to read such post.

ON4SKY, LX3SKY

and as usual... u dont bother to look at my nntp-header.

and u obviously have not been on this newsgroup long either!

because if you were
1. u would have seen plenty of cb'ers howl and moan about morse code
2. u would have read me saying that i passed the 12wpm morse +test+
the second go ...but did not moan about having to pass.
3. u would have read a cb'er describe access to the bands as a
"bargain"
4. u would have read people moan about morse code being old but at the
same time read the same people say that after sitting a morse
joke-test that they now have an m3 callsign.


anonymous ?????? ha! read the lazy b-licensees postings and u +will+
see anonymous!

"class_a_zpk_12wpm"
.uk.net wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:30:38 +0100, "Thierry" Thierry, see
http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/ wrote:


Your mind wide open as I see, like as all "anonymous" post. Pfff.
You do really not reflect the ham spirit. Its a pity to read such post.

ON4SKY, LX3SKY
....


anonymous ?????? ha! read the lazy b-licensees postings and u +will+
see anonymous!


Not from all of us...

Martin (G8FXC)

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:14:40 -0000, "Martin"
wrote:

anonymous ?????? ha! read the lazy b-licensees postings and u +will+
see anonymous!


Not from all of us...

Martin (G8FXC)


there is no proof whatsoever that you are anyone even related to any
callsign you give.

The same goes for a certain LEAD INSTRUCTOR who could be in fact
a G3xxx since the days when he in the trenches reporting back at 40wpm
with one hand while digging a fox hole with the other !

"class_a_zpk_12wpm"
.uk.net wrote in message
...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:14:40 -0000, "Martin"
wrote:

anonymous ?????? ha! read the lazy b-licensees postings and u +will+
see anonymous!


Not from all of us...

Martin (G8FXC)


there is no proof whatsoever that you are anyone even related to any
callsign you give.


True, but then the same could be said of everyone here, so don't single out
the class Bs

Martin (G8FXC)

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:56:50 -0000, "Martin"
wrote:

"class_a_zpk_12wpm"
o.uk.net wrote in message
...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:14:40 -0000, "Martin"
wrote:

anonymous ?????? ha! read the lazy b-licensees postings and u +will+
see anonymous!


Not from all of us...

Martin (G8FXC)


there is no proof whatsoever that you are anyone even related to any
callsign you give.


True, but then the same could be said of everyone here, so don't single out
the class Bs

Martin (G8FXC)

since when did i single out class-b's ?

me thinks youre logic has a touch of the filtons.

"class_a_zpk_12wpm"
.uk.net wrote in message
...
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:56:50 -0000, "Martin"
wrote:

"class_a_zpk_12wpm"
o.uk.net wrote in
message
...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:14:40 -0000, "Martin"
wrote:

anonymous ?????? ha! read the lazy b-licensees postings and u
+will+
see anonymous!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^


Not from all of us...

Martin (G8FXC)


there is no proof whatsoever that you are anyone even related to any
callsign you give.


True, but then the same could be said of everyone here, so don't single
out
the class Bs

Martin (G8FXC)

since when did i single out class-b's ?

See above...


me thinks youre logic has a touch of the filtons.

Martin (G8FXC)

(class_a_zpk_12wpm) wrote in :

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:14:40 -0000, "Martin"
wrote:

anonymous ?????? ha! read the lazy b-licensees postings and u +will+
see anonymous!


Not from all of us...

Martin (G8FXC)


there is no proof whatsoever that you are anyone even related to any
callsign you give.

The same goes for a certain LEAD INSTRUCTOR who could be in fact
a G3xxx since the days when he in the trenches reporting back at 40wpm
with one hand while digging a fox hole with the other !



Now you've really gone off at a tangent. I suppose you assume that G8s
must be ashamed of their calls. Nothing could be further from the truth.

G8VUK

On 30 Oct 2003 16:05:57 GMT, Alun Palmer wrote:


there is no proof whatsoever that you are anyone even related to any
callsign you give.

The same goes for a certain LEAD INSTRUCTOR who could be in fact
a G3xxx since the days when he in the trenches reporting back at 40wpm
with one hand while digging a fox hole with the other !



Now you've really gone off at a tangent. I suppose you assume that G8s
must be ashamed of their calls. Nothing could be further from the truth.

G8VUK
oh boys oh boys....theyre all lining up now!!!




tangent - not me !

i never said that g8's were ever ashamed of their callsigns.
AND YOU KNOW IT!


It is my opinion if any G8 expects to be taken seriously by many who
HAVE got their finger out and EARNED THEIR PRIVILEGE OF HF ACCESS
where certain G8's havent even bothered to try then it is my opinion
that those g8's are sadly misguided.


the fact remains:
ANYONE WITH A G8xxx CALLSIGN HAS HAD PLENTY OF TIME TO GET THROUGH A
SIMPLE 12 or 5WPM MORSE TEST.

"Alun Palmer" wrote in message
...

(class_a_zpk_12wpm) wrote in :
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:14:40 -0000, "Martin"
wrote:
snip
Now you've really gone off at a tangent. I suppose you assume that G8s
must be ashamed of their calls. Nothing could be further from the truth.
G8VUK

I was, but we now seem to be living in the Blairright era of pseudo
egalitarian shamelessness, so your reply doesn't surprise me

Steve Terry