Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
.5W or 5.5W?
I'm sending a IC-V8 (2m) up on a high altitude balloon, and was
debating on what power setting to use. Ideally, I'd go with the higher power setting (5.5W), but due to the cold temperatures that are encountered (even with insulation) and limited battery life (even with a higher capacity battery), going with .5W is more reliable from a battery life standpoint. Also, I'm using an audio sound module (not packet radio) to relay GPS information back. My question is: can I get clear reception using the .5W power setting, even when the balloon is, say, 75 miles away at an altitude of 20 miles? Thanks in advance! Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
David Harper wrote: I'm sending a IC-V8 (2m) up on a high altitude balloon, and was debating on what power setting to use. Ideally, I'd go with the higher power setting (5.5W), but due to the cold temperatures that are encountered (even with insulation) and limited battery life (even with a higher capacity battery), going with .5W is more reliable from a battery life standpoint. Also, I'm using an audio sound module (not packet radio) to relay GPS information back. My question is: can I get clear reception using the .5W power setting, even when the balloon is, say, 75 miles away at an altitude of 20 miles? Thanks in advance! Dave With no obstructions, .5 watts will work as good as 5.5 watts. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Dave
My congratulation on your project. Can you tell me is this balloon going to return or is it a one time event. I would go for low power, the lower the better. Larry ve3fxq "David Harper" wrote in message om... I'm sending a IC-V8 (2m) up on a high altitude balloon, and was debating on what power setting to use. Ideally, I'd go with the higher power setting (5.5W), but due to the cold temperatures that are encountered (even with insulation) and limited battery life (even with a higher capacity battery), going with .5W is more reliable from a battery life standpoint. Also, I'm using an audio sound module (not packet radio) to relay GPS information back. My question is: can I get clear reception using the .5W power setting, even when the balloon is, say, 75 miles away at an altitude of 20 miles? Thanks in advance! Dave |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
David Harper wrote:
I'm sending a IC-V8 (2m) up on a high altitude balloon, and was debating on what power setting to use. Ideally, I'd go with the higher power setting (5.5W), but due to the cold temperatures that are encountered (even with insulation) and limited battery life (even with a higher capacity battery), going with .5W is more reliable from a battery life standpoint. My question is: can I get clear reception using the .5W power setting, even when the balloon is, say, 75 miles away at an altitude of 20 miles? Assuming you have a line-of-sight path to the balloon, you can use the free space path loss equation to determine your path loss. At an altitude of 20 miles and 75 miles downrange, the distance to the balloon will be 77.62 miles. At 146 MHz, the path loss will be 117.6 dB. Assuming antennas with "zero" dBi gain at both ends of the circuit, the signal provided to your ground receiver will be as follows: A 5.5 watt transmitter will result in 21.64 uV at the receiver. A 0.5 watt transmitter will result in 6.52 uV at the receiver. Art Harris N2AH |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
greetngs
After I thought about your project for a while I remembered something an engineer amateur told a group of amateurs about 20 plus years ago. This group of engineers was building a tall, very tall, structure. This included a number of antennas for both tv and radio transmission, plus some two way radio antennas. To see how good, or bad, the antenna system was the engineer, who was giving this talk, told of an experiment he did to prove a point that you did not need power at high altitudes. He took his handheld and dialed up the direct channel. 146.52 he connected it to one of the tv channel antenna. The resultant swr was considerable. The cable from the radio to the antenna consisted of a long length, perhaps 500 feet, of cable, decoupling networks for the various antennas, etc. He switch over to low power, and called cq. He got a contact in a town about 75 miles away. full quieting. The point is that once you have gotten away from the earths curvature power on vhf and uhf has almost little meaning. I sent an email to the jet propulsion labs a few years ago asking what power the space crafts like the jupiter series that are going beyond the solar system are transmitting. Now granted they are using dishes at both ends and rather suffisticated data decoding etc. But the power level used is somewhat in the order of 1 (one) watt from the spacecraft. Personally I find that incredible and I find myself humbling, and somewhat embarassed, when I used high power on my handheld to transmit 1 mile away. Larry ve3fxq "Art Harris" wrote in message m... David Harper wrote: I'm sending a IC-V8 (2m) up on a high altitude balloon, and was debating on what power setting to use. Ideally, I'd go with the higher power setting (5.5W), but due to the cold temperatures that are encountered (even with insulation) and limited battery life (even with a higher capacity battery), going with .5W is more reliable from a battery life standpoint. My question is: can I get clear reception using the .5W power setting, even when the balloon is, say, 75 miles away at an altitude of 20 miles? Assuming you have a line-of-sight path to the balloon, you can use the free space path loss equation to determine your path loss. At an altitude of 20 miles and 75 miles downrange, the distance to the balloon will be 77.62 miles. At 146 MHz, the path loss will be 117.6 dB. Assuming antennas with "zero" dBi gain at both ends of the circuit, the signal provided to your ground receiver will be as follows: A 5.5 watt transmitter will result in 21.64 uV at the receiver. A 0.5 watt transmitter will result in 6.52 uV at the receiver. Art Harris N2AH |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"larry" wrote: The point is that once you have gotten away from the earths curvature, power on vhf and uhf has almost little meaning. That's not quite true. Yes, earth curvature is the big limiting factor for terrestrial communications. But in free space, signal strength decreases as an "inverse square" function with distance. Everytime you double the distance between the transmitter and receiver, the signal strength decreases by 6 dB (i.e., it becomes only 1/4 as strong). Think of shining a flashlight on a wall. As you move the flashlight further away, it illuminates a larger area, but the intensity decreases. Yes, low power can cover great distances in free space. But power is not is not meaningless. If it were, you wouldn't need those big dishes for C-Band satellite reception. Free space path loss equation: Path Loss (dB) = 36.6 + 20 Log F + 20 Log D Where F is frequency in MHz, and D is distance in miles. (Assumes isotropic antennas at each end, 0 dBi gain). Art Harris N2AH |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why not change the batteries to Lithium (they weigh less) and put out a lot
of power for a long time. Go into the radio and set the power output on "high" to 2 watts, which is a big improvement from 1/2 watt and not as demanding as 5.5 watts output.You might be able to wire the batteries for more amphour rating and a lower voltage due to the need for 2 watts, further extending it's ability to transmit for a longer time. Since the GPS data is streaming, you could even set the transmitter to "burst" or send it's data in 10-15 second bursts every few minutes, extending the batteries even further. Hope this helps....Eddie "David Harper" wrote in message om... I'm sending a IC-V8 (2m) up on a high altitude balloon, and was debating on what power setting to use. Ideally, I'd go with the higher power setting (5.5W), but due to the cold temperatures that are encountered (even with insulation) and limited battery life (even with a higher capacity battery), going with .5W is more reliable from a battery life standpoint. Also, I'm using an audio sound module (not packet radio) to relay GPS information back. My question is: can I get clear reception using the .5W power setting, even when the balloon is, say, 75 miles away at an altitude of 20 miles? Thanks in advance! Dave |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
David Harper wrote:
I'm sending a IC-V8 (2m) up on a high altitude balloon, and was How do you intend to recover your radio? Parachute? I don't want to be under it if/when the balloon pops. Don K6LTS email: take out the garbage. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|