Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Jackson wrote:
From the pictures on the website, 'Coax-Seal' looks exactly like ordinary self-amalgamating tape (as I know it). They are quite different. Self-amalgamating tape is a strong, stretchable tape. 'Coax-Seal' is a form of mouldable putty which just happens to be supplied as a rolled-up strip, but it has no strength as a 'tape'. The cut-away picture shows that it does not actually bond to the plastic outer of the coax, which enables you to open up the connection in the future. Coax-Seal does bond to the plastic jacket, and also to metal - in both cases, well enough to form a good waterproof seal... but if you use it like the illustration in the ads, you'll have a real mess that is very difficult to remove from the metal parts. Self-amalgamating tape is much better in that respect, because it can be cut and peeled off to leave clean surfaces. For round shapes that are simple to wrap - like in-line plugs and jacks - it's best to use only self-amalgamating tape. But for shapes like bulkhead connectors you can't wrap tape tightly down onto the flange, so water can seep upward into the connector. The really useful feature is that Coax-Seal will bond to self-amalgamating tape! That feature lets you use the best possible combination of the two methods. For a cable plug and a bulkhead socket, mould some Coax-Seal around the base of the socket and a short way up the round part - but don't cover the whole connector. Then wrap self-amalgamating tape down over the cable and plug, and onto the Coax-Seal. That gives a very good seal indeed, and you can cut the tape away at any time to find the metal parts clean, bright and dry. I've used these methods for many years on large yagi arrays with many coax connections, and they do keep the connections totally waterproof. However, I would still prefer to give the parts a spray of WD40 before the connections are made, make the connection, spray again to ensure that the threads are wetted, wipe off the obvious surplus (but not trying too hard, so there are still traces left). You then apply the tape, stretching it somewhat as you go, ensuring that you keep a nice, even tension. You end up with a tight-fitting, waterproof rubber boot around the joint, with the WD40 trapped inside to resist any tendency to corrode. I think the only argument is whether to use WD40 or not. If the waterproofing works - and it certainly can - then there won't *be* any tendency to corrosion. -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Dead Serious T2FD: HV Insulation, EMP Arrestors, extra Coax Choke? | Antenna | |||
Best Ways to *Waterproof* Coax Connections | Antenna | |||
Best Ways to *Waterproof* Coax Connections | General | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |