Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie Question - 75 Watts and 2 meters.
I'm assuming that the frequency chosen might have a slight effect on
the range, but with 75 watts screaming from my mobile, what is the potential range with a clear line of sight? Can anyone approximate at all? There's repeaters galore here, but I am quite interested in simplex operations away from the great Dell of loomis. Any info greatly appreciated. You're a great group. 73 DJM |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Daniel J. Morlan" wrote:
I'm assuming that the frequency chosen might have a slight effect on the range, but with 75 watts screaming from my mobile, what is the potential range with a clear line of sight? Can anyone approximate at all? There's repeaters galore here, but I am quite interested in simplex operations away from the great Dell of loomis. Your output power is just one of the many variables that determines range. That gain and height of the antennas at each end of the circuit, as well as terrain, will play a much bigger role. Going from 50 Watts to 75 Watts of transmit power will have almost no effect on range. For true "line-of-sight" paths, the "Free Space Path Loss Equation" is one way to approximate range: Path Loss (in dB) = 36.6 + 20 Log F + 20 Log D Where F is frequency in MHz and D is Distance in miles. This equation assumes isotropic antennas at each end. If you were trying to work the space shuttle at a distance of 250 miles away on 146 MHz, the path loss (from the above equation) would be 127.8 dB. If the shuttle's receiver needed -100 dBm of signal from you, then 1 Watt (or +30 dBm) of transmit power would be sufficient. (+30 dBm transmiited, minus 127.8 dB of path loss, equals -97.8 dBm received) The problem is that few terrestrial paths are really line of sight. Once you get 10 or 20 miles away from another land based station, earth curvature and other obstructions begin to have a big effect. Mobile-to-mobile communications will have the shortest range since antenna heights are so low. Mobile-to-base is better, but two base stations with high gain yagis on tall towers will have the best range of all. Switching from FM to ssb will also greatly increase range for a given power. If you are in flat, open terrain in your mobile running 75 watts, and your buddy has a base station with an omnidirectional antenna at 40 feet, I would estimate your simplex range on 2M FM would be about 25 miles under normal propagation conditions. Art Harris N2AH |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Daniel J. Morlan" wrote in message om... I'm assuming that the frequency chosen might have a slight effect on the range, but with 75 watts screaming from my mobile, what is the potential range with a clear line of sight? Can anyone approximate at all? There's repeaters galore here, but I am quite interested in simplex operations away from the great Dell of loomis. Any info greatly appreciated. You're a great group. 73 DJM It will depend primarily on the antenna height of the receiving station. Power is only a secondary element. While it tends to make a difference between scratchy copy and clear copy, the antennas are far more important. Afterall the Mars rover is only putting out 15watts. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
See URL:
http://ac6v.com/repeaters.htm#TR Has several links to determine transmitter range -- 73 From The Wilderness Keyboard ------------------------------------ "Daniel J. Morlan" wrote in message om... I'm assuming that the frequency chosen might have a slight effect on the range, but with 75 watts screaming from my mobile, what is the potential range with a clear line of sight? Can anyone approximate at all? There's repeaters galore here, but I am quite interested in simplex operations away from the great Dell of loomis. Any info greatly appreciated. You're a great group. 73 DJM |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I am guessing you have a IC-V8000. I have that radio hooked up to a 1/4
wave ground plane antenna 50 feet up and I have transmitted just a little over 100 miles. "73" KI4CXZ Daniel J. Morlan wrote: I'm assuming that the frequency chosen might have a slight effect on the range, but with 75 watts screaming from my mobile, what is the potential range with a clear line of sight? Can anyone approximate at all? There's repeaters galore here, but I am quite interested in simplex operations away from the great Dell of loomis. Any info greatly appreciated. You're a great group. 73 DJM |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Arthur Harris wrote:
"Daniel J. Morlan" wrote: I'm assuming that the frequency chosen might have a slight effect on the range, but with 75 watts screaming from my mobile, what is the potential range with a clear line of sight? Can anyone approximate at all? There's repeaters galore here, but I am quite interested in simplex operations away from the great Dell of loomis. Your output power is just one of the many variables that determines range. That gain and height of the antennas at each end of the circuit, as well as terrain, will play a much bigger role. Going from 50 Watts to 75 Watts of transmit power will have almost no effect on range. For true "line-of-sight" paths, the "Free Space Path Loss Equation" is one way to approximate range: Path Loss (in dB) = 36.6 + 20 Log F + 20 Log D Where F is frequency in MHz and D is Distance in miles. This equation assumes isotropic antennas at each end. Are you certain that the distance should be measured in miles and not kilometers? Using the metric system instead of English units works much better. Ever notice why most radios have an RX sensitivity of 0.16 microvolts? That's a field strength equivalent to 1 watt (isotropically radiated) at a distance of exactly 1 km. 4 watts at 2 km will produce the same field strength. FS = P / ( 2 * pi * D ^ 2 ) FS is in volts. P is in watts. D is in meters. If you were trying to work the space shuttle at a distance of 250 miles away on 146 MHz, the path loss (from the above equation) would be 127.8 dB. If the shuttle's receiver needed -100 dBm of signal from you, then 1 Watt (or +30 dBm) of transmit power would be sufficient. (+30 dBm transmiited, minus 127.8 dB of path loss, equals -97.8 dBm received) The problem is that few terrestrial paths are really line of sight. Once you get 10 or 20 miles away from another land based station, earth curvature and other obstructions begin to have a big effect. Mobile-to-mobile communications will have the shortest range since antenna heights are so low. Mobile-to-base is better, but two base stations with high gain yagis on tall towers will have the best range of all. Switching from FM to ssb will also greatly increase range for a given power. If you are in flat, open terrain in your mobile running 75 watts, and your buddy has a base station with an omnidirectional antenna at 40 feet, I would estimate your simplex range on 2M FM would be about 25 miles under normal propagation conditions. Art Harris N2AH |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"D. Stussy" wrote:
Arthur Harris wrote: Path Loss (in dB) = 36.6 + 20 Log F + 20 Log D Where F is frequency in MHz and D is Distance in miles. This equation assumes isotropic antennas at each end. Are you certain that the distance should be measured in miles and not kilometers? Yes, it's miles. If using kilometers, use 32.45 instead of 36.6 in the equation. There are several path loss calculators on the web, such as: http://www.decibelproducts.com/Calcu...qfreespace.htm Art Harris N2AH |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #629 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #629 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #629 | General |