Looks to me like he satisfied whatever complaints were filed against him and
that in the short term renewal period no other complaints were filed against
him thereby allowing his renewal. Apparently he behaved as asked and was
allowed to renew. All of that is writen in the FCC Enforcement releases,
nothing is hidden or corrupt.


"mick" wrote in message
...
http://www.hcso.tampa.fl.us/pub/defa...sp/bn=03035679

http://www.hcso.tampa.fl.us/pub/defa...sp/BN=03058540

Just why did Riley renew this moron's liscense after he failed to
retest? Looks like corruption to me.

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/1999/08/11/2/

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/1999/10/07/5/