LARDASS Lloyd Davies aka "Arf! Arf!"
blathered in message ...
"more lies

Here's the letter, dumb****, word for word, do see if you canb spot
the reason for the retest, beside the FCC perogative for doing so. And
note, too, that the retest was PASSED, and later the license was
upgraded. Something you haven't been able to do in over 10 years. You
couldn't pass the Technician license exam TODAY if you had to.

------------
July 11, 2000

CERTIFIED MAIL--RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Mr. Roger L. Wiseman

610 Glen Haven Avenue

Glendale, WV 26038-1302

SUBJECT: Amateur Radio license KC8JBO

Dear Mr. Wiseman:

Pursuant to Section 97.519(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.
Section 97.519(d)(2), the Commission has the authority to
re-administer any
examination element previously administered by Volunteer Examiners
(VE's).
The Commission may either administer the examination itself, or under
the
supervision of a Volunteer Examiner Coordinator (VEC) or VE designated
by
the Commission.

Accordingly, we are requiring you to re-take the General Class Amateur
Examination, (Elements 2, 3(A) and 3(B)) under the supervision of an
American Radio Relay League Volunteer Examiner Coordinator. This
examination
must be completed on or before September 11, 2000. The required code
speed
that you must demonstrate is 5 words per minute.

Please be prepared to verify your current address and to present a
photo
identification. Pursuant to Commission rules, your license will be
cancelled
if you do not appear for re-examination. You will be granted an
Amateur
Radio license consistent with the elements you pass upon
re-examination.


Sincerely,



W. Riley Hollingsworth

Special Counsel, Amateur Radio

Enforcement Bureau
------------------------------

blah blah blah

"Overwhelming evidence," dumbass?

This topic has been addressed many times before and each and every time it
is brought forth, Roger spins his usual. He will challenge the poster to
show where he was retested for having violated any FCC rules or regs. Yet
the evidence is clearly there for all to see. No, he was not chosen at
"random" as he likes to claim.

See the above letter. Where does it say WHY other than the FCC's
perogative was the reason for the retest, fatass?

Yes, the FCC CAN ask any Ham licensee who was
licensed under the VEC program to retest, but when was the last time you
heard of that happening?

Go to the ARRL web site, dumbass and to the FCC enforcement logs, they
go back to 1999, there are quite a number of retests and canellations
because some didn't show up to retest. Or can't you even read?


Hollingsworth simply has too much to concern
himself with and the idiotic claim that they "randomly" chose Wiseman for a
retest is laughable at best.


I'll bet he'll be interested once he reads your kiddie porn ad.

The excerpts concerning the Wiseman debacle are easily found via several
sources. The ARRL site is one such example. A Google search will yield each
and every letter of warning for Malicious Interference by Wiseman...it takes
only a few minutes to find.

That's because there is only ONE letter, **** for brains. And it
"alledges" interference, which doesn't prove a thing. Then there of
course, it the preemptive letter which your buddy Gopher face recieved
also.
Didn't LRod explain this to you before? Or are you just too ****ing
stupid for it to have soaked in your empty, Evinrude motor cover
shaped skull the first time?

but the bottom line is that he was forced to
retest not randomly, but because Riley Hollingsworth was willing to rescind
his Ham License if he failed to comply.

Why didn't he say so in the letter? Nowhere does it say any license
would be recinded. Hollingsworth would have no qualms to put that in
the letter if it were so. Looks like you are blathering out of your
ignorant fat ass again.

[flush more of mentally ill retard Davies' blatherings]

Poor mentally ill retard Lardass Lloyd Davies. He'll soon be back in
the funny farm. He's tried suicide before, you know.